Dynamometer Results & Comparisons Dyno Records | Dyno Discussion | Dyno Wars

ETP 4.8/5.3 vs. Trick Flow 205's 30 rwhp difference!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-12-2007 | 07:01 PM
  #1  
Chuck@'s Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic

iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,207
Likes: 0
From: Houston, TX
Default ETP 4.8/5.3 vs. Trick Flow 205's 30 rwhp difference!!

Vehicle is an M6
Stock LS2 bottom end
HPE S cam
American Racing 1 7/8 Headers
American Racing Midpipes with High flow cats
Fast 90mm
Ported LS2 TB
160* Thermostat

We gained a solid 30 rwhp over the ETP 5.3 230cc heads. Props to Trick Flow for making some very nice heads!



Chuck @ HPE
281-448-1300
www.horsepowerengineering.com
Old 02-12-2007 | 07:38 PM
  #2  
raymond mckinney's Avatar
10 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,275
Likes: 63
From: Tampa, FL
Default

Trickflow 215's or 225's?
Old 02-12-2007 | 09:20 PM
  #3  
gnx7's Avatar
TECH Junkie
20 Year Member
iTrader: (28)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 3,526
Likes: 194
From: San Francisco, CA
Default

Was the compression ratio the same? That could be a major contributing factor.
Old 02-13-2007 | 05:38 AM
  #4  
bad95killer's Avatar
TECH Addict
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 2,906
Likes: 0
From: Somewhere I Belong
Default

Originally Posted by raymond mckinney
Trickflow 215's or 225's?
I'd like to know either ?!

peace
Old 02-13-2007 | 07:00 AM
  #5  
John02SS's Avatar
10 Second Club
iTrader: (47)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,453
Likes: 0
From: Pace, FL
Default

On a LS2 it is prolly the 4.0 bore 225 version. Good numbers guys, and thanks for posting the results.
Old 02-13-2007 | 08:28 AM
  #6  
Chuck@'s Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic

iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,207
Likes: 0
From: Houston, TX
Default

They were the 215's with stock compression! Sorry I made a typo in the original post!

Chuck
Old 02-13-2007 | 08:41 AM
  #7  
VINCE's Avatar
Shorty Director
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 8,260
Likes: 4
From: Valrico, Florida
Default

There is a sticky about Vendor vs Vendor threads.. Please go read. I am going to let this post ride, but I am going to watch it. If this gets out of hand I am going to look for individual nutswingers to punish. I dont like Vendor fights and I will ask PSJ to talk to any Vendor who instigates these type of threads...
Old 02-13-2007 | 08:48 AM
  #8  
Brian Tooley Racing's Avatar
FormerVendor
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,943
Likes: 7
From: Bardstown, KY
Default

Originally Posted by VINCE
There is a sticky about Vendor vs Vendor threads.. Please go read. I am going to let this post ride, but I am going to watch it. If this gets out of hand I am going to look for individual nutswingers to punish. I dont like Vendor fights and I will ask PSJ to talk to any Vendor who instigates these type of threads...
I think HPE buys from both...so just relax.

I wish Chuck would have tested the TFS 225 head that is made for an LS2, maybe you could do that next?

It's amazing that the TFS heads raised the entire torque curve, Congrats on the new found power

Last edited by Brian Tooley Racing; 02-13-2007 at 09:10 AM.
Old 02-13-2007 | 09:13 AM
  #9  
VINCE's Avatar
Shorty Director
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 8,260
Likes: 4
From: Valrico, Florida
Default

Originally Posted by Brian Tooley
I think HPE buys from both...so just relax.

I wish Chuck would have tested the TFS 225 head that is made for an LS2, maybe you could do that next?

Congrats on the new found power
I know Chuck buys from both. You know just as well as I how these threads quickly get out of hand... I have witnessed you lose your temper many times about vendor vs vendor threads. I would personally like to keep you guys around. No one needs to have a stroke due to high blood pressure.

As for my car.. I have seen the TFS 225's #'s and there is no dispute on the same flow bench your heads against others flow very well. I admit it is time for other vendors to upgrade, but I cant justify the cost of changing my heads w/out seeing atleast a 50rwhp increase at the same boost levels and I doubt I would see that...
Old 02-13-2007 | 10:43 AM
  #10  
BADSZ28's Avatar
11 Second Club
iTrader: (39)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,321
Likes: 0
From: NW Chicago Subs
Default

Incredible.
Old 02-13-2007 | 11:49 AM
  #11  
transAm-98's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 625
Likes: 0
From: CA, Bay Area
Default

I need a few more threads like this to decide what route I go for heads when the 408 is ready. Trick Flows are looking very promising.
Old 02-13-2007 | 11:53 AM
  #12  
Chuck@'s Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic

iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,207
Likes: 0
From: Houston, TX
Default

Originally Posted by transAm-98
I need a few more threads like this to decide what route I go for heads when the 408 is ready. Trick Flows are looking very promising.
If the 215's can do this... the 225's would do even better So keep that in mind.

Chuck
Old 02-13-2007 | 12:39 PM
  #13  
Beast96Z's Avatar
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 4,049
Likes: 3
From: Shreveport, LA
Default

Aftermarket casting/new technology > Stock casting/old technology Just more of a reason why you shouldn't skimp on stock heads if you don't have to.
Old 02-13-2007 | 12:41 PM
  #14  
383LQ4SS's Avatar
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 4,266
Likes: 0
From: Port Richey
Default

I will be getting some Trickflows in my future. I just need to locate a damn car first.

Impressive stuff guys!
Old 02-13-2007 | 01:41 PM
  #15  
pdd's Avatar
pdd
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,156
Likes: 0
From: dudley mass
Default

very impressive- whats with the dip on both runs in tq at 4k? can that be tuned out?
Old 02-13-2007 | 02:01 PM
  #16  
Chuck@'s Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic

iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,207
Likes: 0
From: Houston, TX
Default

Originally Posted by pdd
very impressive- whats with the dip on both runs in tq at 4k? can that be tuned out?
No, I've tried tuning it out before on other cars, but typically changing the a/f ratio and timing under peak torque does not effect the numbers too much. Dips are usually related to the car, or advance ground into the cam vs. what it actually has in the motor. A cam ground with +4 from Comp won't always have +4 in it due to inaccuracies in grinding... then take into thought inaccuracies in timing chain manufacturing and crank key placement... All these factors effect the outcome of what timing actually is. Thus, sometimes you will have a car that might just have some retard. Only way to know for sure is by hooking up a degree wheel and finding out!

Chuck
Old 02-13-2007 | 02:11 PM
  #17  
V6 Bird's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 5,109
Likes: 0
From: Grand Prairie, TX
Default

Originally Posted by Chuck@HPE
No, I've tried tuning it out before on other cars, but typically changing the a/f ratio and timing under peak torque does not effect the numbers too much. Dips are usually related to the car, or advance ground into the cam vs. what it actually has in the motor. A cam ground with +4 from Comp won't always have +4 in it due to inaccuracies in grinding... then take into thought inaccuracies in timing chain manufacturing and crank key placement... All these factors effect the outcome of what timing actually is. Thus, sometimes you will have a car that might just have some retard. Only way to know for sure is by hooking up a degree wheel and finding out!

Chuck
Isnt that something that should be done when installing the cam anyway?
Old 02-13-2007 | 04:24 PM
  #18  
LostCauseZ06's Avatar
11 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,294
Likes: 0
From: Ogden, Utah
Default

very nice results chuck! havent seen ya on here in a while, good to see your back!
Old 02-13-2007 | 04:54 PM
  #19  
BADSZ28's Avatar
11 Second Club
iTrader: (39)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,321
Likes: 0
From: NW Chicago Subs
Default

Originally Posted by V6 Bird
Isnt that something that should be done when installing the cam anyway?
An **** person would or engine builder I would expect to. But IMO, if it is already ground into it, then DtoD should be good enough. If I had a wheel and patience I would have on my car. Probably would have pulled past 6300RPM too since it falls way short for a TRex. But I like the low and mid range I am getting out of it right now.
Old 02-13-2007 | 06:10 PM
  #20  
Cary@Perf-Induction's Avatar
Collections Hold
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 476
Likes: 0
From: howell mi
Default ...

Interesting results Chuck. those tfs heads are pretty good stuff. We ran our ETP 215 a-b test against our ported ls6 and 5.3 heads, same motor, same dyno same day. We saw almost 44 hp between our 5.3 heads and 215 heads. I will post the dyno sheets as soon as I can figure out how to. This was on a 346 though.

Last edited by Cary@Perf-Induction; 02-14-2007 at 05:04 AM. Reason: typo


Quick Reply: ETP 4.8/5.3 vs. Trick Flow 205's 30 rwhp difference!!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:53 PM.