408 Ls3/l92 467/460
#61
#62
#63
I got her all tore appart. lifter on #3 cylinder was collapsed, got a new set of morrels with a link bar. Im gonna swap the lifters in and keep running the same cam untill a later date, plus it will give somewhat of a benchmark
#65
Cartek Cam 402/L92 setup
I made 485/445 and the car drives nice. Thanks Ed!!! I'm sure cam designs have progressed in the past year for the L92 heads.
Bob K.
#66
Jeff you think I should shim them more? its already 420lbs closed, They are at 1.8" installed height. i dont want to get coil bind. morrels are soaking in oil. I might mess with it tomorrow, undecided. damn thoes intake valves are big. i forgot what they looked like.
#69
Still looking... that should tell you something
Why do you think the valves are sucha pain to control and hardly anyone has the results you should see out of 350 cfm heads? That engine should be capable of making 560+
Why do you think the valves are sucha pain to control and hardly anyone has the results you should see out of 350 cfm heads? That engine should be capable of making 560+
#73
Glad to hear the car is running great. I've got a couple more things in the works.
Kevin
HIJACK OFF...
#74
From what I have found my 236/248 makes more power than the 236/236 I had by around 20rwhp.
I would look into this cam if I were you.
my L92 headed 408 made 47Xrwhp and over 500 torque thru a TH400, 4k stall, and 9 inch rear end.
#75
I dont know Rick, Ive seen 18 as a low and as much as 70-80 hp diff from this one and dynojet (and other mustang dynoes)
I dont care really, I know what xxx hp at xx weight equals on this dyno, never had anything else come close to repeatability.
I dont care really, I know what xxx hp at xx weight equals on this dyno, never had anything else come close to repeatability.