Dyno Guesses & Bench Racing Forum Horsepower Estimates | Racing Scenarios
View Poll Results: What do you think
The LS1 is not underrated
3
3.70%
Stock horsepower is around 340-350
69
85.19%
The stock LS1 makes around 380
9
11.11%
Voters: 81. You may not vote on this poll

What SHOULD the LS1 be rated

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-20-2009, 10:16 PM
  #1  
TECH Addict
Thread Starter
 
MikeWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,354
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default What SHOULD the LS1 be rated

98-02 WS6 and SS models were all rated right around 320-325 horse power. My question is what should they have been rated at the flywheel. Some people argue the rating is close because the trans if very good at getting power to the wheels, and a 12% loss should be used. Others say the ls1 is very underrated and a 15% loss should be considered.

Lets say the average LS1 puts down 300 horse power

300rwh 12% loss=340 fly
300rwh 15% loss= 352 fly

I even saw muscle mustang claim 321 at the rear wheels! Which is almost 380 at the motor.
Old 05-20-2009, 10:20 PM
  #2  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (27)
 
black_phoenix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Dayton, NV
Posts: 1,203
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

in my case when completely stock, the ls1 made 380bhp... but commonly its 340 bhp...
Old 05-20-2009, 10:22 PM
  #3  
TECH Addict
Thread Starter
 
MikeWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,354
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by black_phoenix
in my case when completely stock, the ls1 made 380bhp... but commonly its 340 bhp...
Wow. I understand each dyno is different but thats pretty good. What did u put down? 325ish?
Old 05-20-2009, 11:05 PM
  #4  
TECH Addict
Thread Starter
 
MikeWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,354
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Beginning in 2001, the LS1 received the higher-flowing intake from the LS6 and a milder camshaft to keep power at the same level;

^^ From wiki.

Looks like the 01-02 cars did not make more power but were just rated higher.
Old 05-20-2009, 11:22 PM
  #5  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
allngn_c5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Western Burbs of Detroit
Posts: 6,524
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

My 2000 FRC had an ls1 turd in it. 300 rwhp 300 rwtq bone stock. Just my 2 cents.
Old 05-20-2009, 11:23 PM
  #6  
TECH Addict
Thread Starter
 
MikeWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,354
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by allngn_c5
My 2000 FRC had an ls1 turd in it. 300 rwhp 300 rwtq bone stock. Just my 2 cents.
Thats around 340
Old 05-20-2009, 11:34 PM
  #7  
Teching In
iTrader: (1)
 
scritch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

yea thats a pretty good estimate
Old 05-20-2009, 11:45 PM
  #8  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
allngn_c5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Western Burbs of Detroit
Posts: 6,524
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by MikeWS6
Thats around 340
Well then I want some $$$ back for being over rated by 5 bhp. LOL !!
Old 05-20-2009, 11:52 PM
  #9  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (5)
 
krazy4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Yorba Linda, CA
Posts: 1,457
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

My 02 Z28 M6 made 354whp with an slp lid, slp maf, and a cutout.

STOCK MANIFOLDS and CATS.
Old 05-20-2009, 11:56 PM
  #10  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
phoenix1987's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 421
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by allngn_c5
My 2000 FRC had an ls1 turd in it. 300 rwhp 300 rwtq bone stock. Just my 2 cents.
A buddy of mine put 308rwhp in his 99 vette bone stock.
Old 05-21-2009, 12:16 AM
  #11  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (3)
 
Oso SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Scottsdale AZ
Posts: 657
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

i put down exactly 309/309 stock through an auto 02 ss
Old 05-21-2009, 12:18 AM
  #12  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (7)
 
primer84z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 426
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The f-body LS1's should be rated at what their vette counterparts were rated at, 345 or 350. Look at the 04 GTO's, they were rated at 350 with the same engine.
Old 05-21-2009, 12:21 AM
  #13  
TECH Addict
Thread Starter
 
MikeWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,354
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by primer84z
The f-body LS1's should be rated at what their vette counterparts were rated at, 345 or 350. Look at the 04 GTO's, they were rated at 350 with the same engine.
^^this
Old 05-21-2009, 12:25 AM
  #14  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (27)
 
black_phoenix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Dayton, NV
Posts: 1,203
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by MikeWS6
Wow. I understand each dyno is different but thats pretty good. What did u put down? 325ish?
320 rwhp... i guess 370 bhp
Old 05-21-2009, 01:56 AM
  #15  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (22)
 
zigroid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: 18013
Posts: 713
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I think you guys putting down 320 rwhp had happy dynos.

I was just at a dyno day, dyno is not happy or low, reads pretty accurate. my car is a 99 formula, bone stock with 132k miles. my friends car is an 02 vette, bone stock with 30k miles.



im the red run, hes the green run.

I have no idea why I have so much more low end torque than he does but the hp and tq numbers are still pretty close. I would say LS1s were all around 345-355 hp.
Old 05-21-2009, 10:00 PM
  #16  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (51)
 
30th t/a's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Butler, PA
Posts: 3,099
Received 16 Likes on 14 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by zigroid
I think you guys putting down 320 rwhp had happy dynos.



I have no idea why I have so much more low end torque than he does but the hp and tq numbers are still pretty close. I would say LS1s were all around 345-355 hp.
I agree about the "Happy Dyno's"

The corvette rear takes more power to turn plus I think they have bigger rear wheels & tires and that will also eat up RWHP.
Old 05-22-2009, 07:29 PM
  #17  
TECH Enthusiast
 
00FlowCamaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Watertown, WI
Posts: 681
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I voted "not underrated" becuase I just wanted to see the results haha. Interesting to see the dyno numbers and such and to find out its that far underrated.
Old 05-30-2009, 01:19 PM
  #18  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (127)
 
NemeSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Houston,TX
Posts: 6,888
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

i dynoed 316rwhp with about 3k miles on my 02 ss
it was at a local import place my cousin use to work at. they had a dyno day. dynoed for free. with stock filter
import fanboys expression 0_o
Old 05-31-2009, 11:53 AM
  #19  
TECH Resident
 
Blackhawk777's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Omahaish. Nebraska.
Posts: 855
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Mine stock dyno'd right about 310/325 with about 85k on it at the time.... I'm going with 350+
Old 06-02-2009, 01:17 PM
  #20  
TECH Apprentice
 
ponygt65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: CA
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Assuming 300rwhp I'd say rate all LS1 (vette, GTO, Fbod, etc.) at 360bhp.

300/.85 = 355

However, there are tranny's to think about and most that Iv'e seen are just north of 300rwhp, so I think 360 would have been 'fair'. 350 FOR Sure


Quick Reply: What SHOULD the LS1 be rated



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:35 AM.