Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

Splitting 5" down pipe into 3" duals??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-11-2011, 01:44 AM
  #1  
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (35)
 
02_ramair_ta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Hanford, Ca
Posts: 352
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default Splitting 5" down pipe into 3" duals??

I am putting my 91.5 turbo into my 72 Nova, running the truck manifolds, and building the whole setup little by little, myself..


My question is, If I take the 5" down pipe, run it out about 6 inches and then split it into 3" duals, how much if any effect would of could that have? I understand that you want as little backpressure coming back against the turbo, so would I run into any issues.. or would it maybe help, like a venturi effect, if done right?


Thanks for the help!
Old 03-11-2011, 06:52 AM
  #2  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (21)
 
Fireball's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Cecil County Raceway!!!
Posts: 8,484
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

dual 3s is smaller than a single 5. need to be 3.5-4"
Old 03-11-2011, 07:29 AM
  #3  
10 Second Club
 
2001WS6Vert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 1,755
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

I did the exhaust on Mark Koehler's car which is 5" split into dual 3 1/2 right out of the turbo. Fireball is right, you need to be at least 3 1/2 to equal the flow of a single 5". Some people questioned the way that the exhaust is done on Mark's car but it seems to not hurt it too much, it has run 7.50 and this year should knock that number down some considering the changes being done.
Old 03-11-2011, 08:29 AM
  #4  
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (35)
 
02_ramair_ta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Hanford, Ca
Posts: 352
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Awesome, thanks for the info, I'll do dual 3.5s. Glad someone with real world experience could step in on the this! I knew someone had to do it. You don't by chance have any pics of that car with the downpipe setup? That would help give me an idea of what works! Thanks again!
Old 03-11-2011, 02:01 PM
  #5  
7 Second Club
iTrader: (11)
 
Phil99vette's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Port Tobacco, MD
Posts: 8,758
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

I purchased a 5" 90 degree elbow and some cones from Woolf Aircraft, I cut the 90 degree elbow into a pair of 45s and welded the 5" to 4" reducer cones on from woolf.

Old 03-11-2011, 02:40 PM
  #6  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (119)
 
PRAY HRD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: CISSNA PARK, IL
Posts: 2,972
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Great question! So with a t4 turbo with a 4" outlet, i'm guessing the dual 3" would actually do pretty well?
Old 03-11-2011, 05:51 PM
  #7  
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (35)
 
02_ramair_ta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Hanford, Ca
Posts: 352
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Phil, that's about what I was thinking, I was worried that putting the split close to the turbo would cause back pressure, I like the reducer cone idea, that would squeeze the airflow, just enough to work kinda making a Venturi effect, now if I could use the Bernoulli principle, then taking it back to a larger section further down would increase the speed, creating a vacuum, and helping pull the exhaust out the pipes???

I know I am WAY over thinking this, and it's just splitting the exhaust, but I'd like to try and help the system with any tricks I could, the more efficient it is, the more power it makes!!!
Old 03-11-2011, 08:30 PM
  #8  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (26)
 
koolrayz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: mansfield ohio
Posts: 2,644
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by PRAY HRD
Great question! So with a t4 turbo with a 4" outlet, i'm guessing the dual 3" would actually do pretty well?
The quick and easy way to calculate how two different size pipes will flow in relationship to each other is to square the line size.
Example as an answer to the about question about dual three's from a 4"
3X3=9 times the two lines = 18
4X4 = 16
So the dual 3" has more flow cabacity.
This does not tak into account line lengths or other restrictions like 90's and a like but is perfect for line size comparisons

dual 3.5 or single 5"
3.5X3.5 = 12.25 X2 = 24.5
5 X 5 =25
very close to being equal.
Old 03-11-2011, 09:51 PM
  #9  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (119)
 
PRAY HRD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: CISSNA PARK, IL
Posts: 2,972
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

That's great info Koolrayz! Thanks!
Old 03-11-2011, 09:51 PM
  #10  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
lifeisgood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: ky
Posts: 1,029
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by koolrayz
The quick and easy way to calculate how two different size pipes will flow in relationship to each other is to square the line size.
Example as an answer to the about question about dual three's from a 4"
3X3=9 times the two lines = 18
4X4 = 16
So the dual 3" has more flow cabacity.
This does not tak into account line lengths or other restrictions like 90's and a like but is perfect for line size comparisons

dual 3.5 or single 5"
3.5X3.5 = 12.25 X2 = 24.5
5 X 5 =25
very close to being equal.
nice explanation, i even understood that. haha
Old 03-12-2011, 06:28 AM
  #11  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (21)
 
Fireball's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Cecil County Raceway!!!
Posts: 8,484
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I merged two 4" bends into a 5" transition.

Old 03-12-2011, 06:30 AM
  #12  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (21)
 
Fireball's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Cecil County Raceway!!!
Posts: 8,484
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by koolrayz
The quick and easy way to calculate how two different size pipes will flow in relationship to each other is to square the line size.
Example as an answer to the about question about dual three's from a 4"
3X3=9 times the two lines = 18
4X4 = 16
So the dual 3" has more flow cabacity.
This does not tak into account line lengths or other restrictions like 90's and a like but is perfect for line size comparisons

dual 3.5 or single 5"
3.5X3.5 = 12.25 X2 = 24.5
5 X 5 =25
very close to being equal.
close approximation, but its really pi*d^2/4. so you multiply the diameter by itself and multply by .79
Old 03-12-2011, 08:41 AM
  #13  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (26)
 
koolrayz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: mansfield ohio
Posts: 2,644
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Fireball
close approximation, but its really pi*d^2/4. so you multiply the diameter by itself and multply by .79
It is what I call street math. I can do it in my head anywhere in a matter of seconds. Given the other variables in fabricating automotive piping systems it works fine. I would not use it when I am designing a system at work, but for a guy that has to ask on the Internet it will work better than a lot of the answers they would otherwise get. Not to infer there was bad information in this thread but, I know we have all seen plenty on the interwebz.



Quick Reply: Splitting 5" down pipe into 3" duals??



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:22 PM.