Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

SN95 5.3 TH400 3.27 build thread - 10.88/134.86 - NOW LQ9

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-12-2014, 12:07 PM
  #101  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (11)
 
69-chvl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: THORNTON, PA (NEAR PHILLY)
Posts: 1,620
Received 31 Likes on 23 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ajrothm
Your dyno guy is an idiot.... AFR, timing and air filters can make a HUGE difference...

LOL!

Hey, he's not MY guy, just a guy with a dyno lol.

Still lol'ing over here.

They are new ls9 springs (which are really ls6 springs but I feel a bit taken by Lingenfelter on that deal) and I think they should be swapped out. Also, its a th400 with a 10" Trans Specialties converter - nothing special but could be slipped like hell who knows.
Old 07-12-2014, 12:09 PM
  #102  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (11)
 
69-chvl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: THORNTON, PA (NEAR PHILLY)
Posts: 1,620
Received 31 Likes on 23 Posts

Default

He did say this dyno reads a lot lower than the other, and would of made 500 rwhp if the car wasn't heat soaked, but that's how its driven.
Old 07-12-2014, 02:52 PM
  #103  
TECH Enthusiast
 
ajrothm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: League City, Tx
Posts: 577
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Well it would have been 530rwhp on a Dj248 dyno so.... I wouldn't put too much stock in the numbers...T400 and a converter will eat up some power for sure.. I bet that car will trap in the mid to high 130s..
Old 07-12-2014, 05:30 PM
  #104  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (2)
 
Hank Peabody's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Abilene TX
Posts: 667
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 13 Posts

Default

Crazy torque, good work Vince! The stock LQ4 cam/springs and that same turbo peaked about the same rpm on the original setup in that Sunbird I had, so I'd think an LS6 in a 5.3 would peak 6k or a higher. Might be the valve springs or converter, but like said it will probably fly at the track! Interesting findings with the water/methanol too, Ive always had the same weirdness with it if spraying a little too much.
Old 07-13-2014, 11:09 AM
  #105  
Moderator
iTrader: (2)
 
denmah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 5,339
Likes: 0
Received 31 Likes on 25 Posts

Default

that thing should fly! let us know how it does at the track!
Old 07-15-2014, 04:47 AM
  #106  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (11)
 
69-chvl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: THORNTON, PA (NEAR PHILLY)
Posts: 1,620
Received 31 Likes on 23 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Hank Peabody
Crazy torque, good work Vince! The stock LQ4 cam/springs and that same turbo peaked about the same rpm on the original setup in that Sunbird I had, so I'd think an LS6 in a 5.3 would peak 6k or a higher. Might be the valve springs or converter, but like said it will probably fly at the track! Interesting findings with the water/methanol too, Ive always had the same weirdness with it if spraying a little too much.
Frank,

All the dyno tests I've found online show the LS6 cam peaking at 5300 n/a...but you've experienced different?
Old 07-15-2014, 07:50 AM
  #107  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (2)
 
Hank Peabody's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Abilene TX
Posts: 667
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 13 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 69-chvl
Frank,

All the dyno tests I've found online show the LS6 cam peaking at 5300 n/a...but you've experienced different?
My setup was a stock LQ4 (stock springs/cam) so 196/204 cam, smaller than LS6, and same turbo, and it peaked at 5300 or 5400. So smaller cam on a bigger engine I'd think it would peak a little earlier than a smaller engine and bigger cam. Usually a decent sized turbo like you have will push peak power up a few 100 rpm over naturally aspirated too. My setup was carbed so maybe thats why my peak was pushed up a little? Either way great results Vince!
Old 07-15-2014, 11:27 AM
  #108  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (11)
 
69-chvl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: THORNTON, PA (NEAR PHILLY)
Posts: 1,620
Received 31 Likes on 23 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Hank Peabody
My setup was a stock LQ4 (stock springs/cam) so 196/204 cam, smaller than LS6, and same turbo, and it peaked at 5300 or 5400. So smaller cam on a bigger engine I'd think it would peak a little earlier than a smaller engine and bigger cam. Usually a decent sized turbo like you have will push peak power up a few 100 rpm over naturally aspirated too. My setup was carbed so maybe thats why my peak was pushed up a little? Either way great results Vince!
I did think it would peak higher I have to admit. I also thought there would of been more RWHP to be honest at 16psi. Going to try a track visit this week if I can find the time.

I wonder if my springs are just too weak, although my datatlogger was showing pretty smooth power (no erractic afr etc). 16psi is probably getting on the edge (or past the edge) of what they can control. That will be the next upgrade.

And I'm still baffled as to how an engine can pick-up 42hp but tq jumps +154lbs - can somebody explain that??
Old 07-15-2014, 03:16 PM
  #109  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
 
RonSSNova's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 4,600
Received 700 Likes on 441 Posts

Default

I thought your graphs looked weird. They were also hard to read. Fuzzy.
My guess is that you are much higher hp than that dyno session showed.

The track will tell all. Esp if you know what the car weighs.

All just my two cents.
Also why I won't go to a dyno unless I know the operator.
Old 07-18-2014, 11:14 PM
  #110  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (11)
 
69-chvl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: THORNTON, PA (NEAR PHILLY)
Posts: 1,620
Received 31 Likes on 23 Posts

Default

7 runs, 20 min cool downs, made it to there and back under its own power!

1.88-7.21/106 & 10.88/134.32 AT 16PSI. I did put 5 gals of 100 octane in there for some protection

Car is a slug off the line and I couldn't leave with any boost, just pushes through the brakes. And, I get an 1100 rpm drop from 1-2, but only 400 from 2-3. I gotta feeling the converter slipping up top cause I think the mph is a little light for 16 psi. My guess is that the car weighs about 3600 with me in there at 210lbs??

No meth injection and the highest IAT was 125* at the end of the runs.

Not epic times, but definitely a good time
Old 07-19-2014, 01:24 AM
  #111  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
 
RonSSNova's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 4,600
Received 700 Likes on 441 Posts

Default

Good job. Got to be happy with the mph though.
FWIW, that's more than 497 RWHP.......

Your IC must be working well! I see 155 degrees and I'm at less boost. Either that or my Treadstone just isn't very effective.

I only made three runs tonight, and in the process I blew all of the coolant out. Oops. So much for LS1 MLS gaskets and China studs......

Another FWIW, adding timing on the foot brake, I tried 33, gave me no boost. I could hold 3200 rpm and that was 90kpa.

Glad you finally made it out!

Ron
Old 07-19-2014, 03:10 AM
  #112  
On The Tree
 
nasty64's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 184
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Congrats on your first track day, saweet build! How do you like Hollys EFI ecu/harness setup? User friendly?
Old 07-19-2014, 07:29 AM
  #113  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (11)
 
69-chvl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: THORNTON, PA (NEAR PHILLY)
Posts: 1,620
Received 31 Likes on 23 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by RonSSNova
Good job. Got to be happy with the mph though.
FWIW, that's more than 497 RWHP.......

Your IC must be working well! I see 155 degrees and I'm at less boost. Either that or my Treadstone just isn't very effective.

I only made three runs tonight, and in the process I blew all of the coolant out. Oops. So much for LS1 MLS gaskets and China studs......

Another FWIW, adding timing on the foot brake, I tried 33, gave me no boost. I could hold 3200 rpm and that was 90kpa.

Glad you finally made it out!

Ron
I tried a bunch of things on the 2 step and then some timing maneuvers and nothing. Have to decide if I want to run the car on a regular basis and get a t-brake and a cage. Maybe some really good brakes??

How do some folks get boost off the line...


Originally Posted by nasty64
Congrats on your first track day, saweet build! How do you like Hollys EFI ecu/harness setup? User friendly?
Its awesome and I wouldn't of done this whole thing w/o it...extremely user friendly - which is what I think your concerned about
Old 07-19-2014, 07:44 AM
  #114  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (11)
 
69-chvl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: THORNTON, PA (NEAR PHILLY)
Posts: 1,620
Received 31 Likes on 23 Posts

Default

Shift drops look decent?

Attachment 460854

Last edited by 69-chvl; 08-20-2014 at 09:40 AM.
Old 07-19-2014, 09:26 AM
  #115  
Teching In
 
Doug F's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Hey Vince,
Glad you got it to the track. If it's 3600 lbs, I agree with Ron, it's making more than 500 RWHP. The fuel flow will tell the story. Sure don't need WM to cool things.

You can't really say you have "1100" and "400" drop as the shift RPM was quite a bit higher on the 1-2. If you shift higher RPM, the drops will be "more", but not at the RPM points you want possibly. It's all about getting the shift RPM and recovery RPM where you want it. On my car I shift at 7000-7200 and with my tighter converter, it drops to about 6000 RPM. If I shifted at 6k, I'd have no drop. So its about putting the RPM range where you want it as you go down the track (as you know).

So if you want to shift at 5800, the converter is probably too loose. If you up the shifts to say 6300-6400, might be better, assuming you make power there, which I think you make power down low.

Right converter and T brake and you have mid 9's.
Old 07-19-2014, 09:28 AM
  #116  
8 Second Club
 
LILHEMI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: in my neighborhood
Posts: 1,009
Received 30 Likes on 15 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 69-chvl
7 runs, 20 min cool downs, made it to there and back under its own power!

1.88-7.21/106 & 10.88/134.32 AT 16PSI. I did put 5 gals of 100 octane in there for some protection

Car is a slug off the line and I couldn't leave with any boost, just pushes through the brakes. And, I get an 1100 rpm drop from 1-2, but only 400 from 2-3. I gotta feeling the converter slipping up top cause I think the mph is a little light for 16 psi. My guess is that the car weighs about 3600 with me in there at 210lbs??

No meth injection and the highest IAT was 125* at the end of the runs.

Not epic times, but definitely a good time
that mph with the weight you gave is 676whp. not too shabby. i ran 9.96@134 so if you can get the car sorted it will run 9s very easily.
Old 07-19-2014, 09:28 AM
  #117  
Teching In
 
Doug F's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RonSSNova
Good job. Got to be happy with the mph though.
FWIW, that's more than 497 RWHP.......

Your IC must be working well! I see 155 degrees and I'm at less boost. Either that or my Treadstone just isn't very effective.

I only made three runs tonight, and in the process I blew all of the coolant out. Oops. So much for LS1 MLS gaskets and China studs......

Another FWIW, adding timing on the foot brake, I tried 33, gave me no boost. I could hold 3200 rpm and that was 90kpa.

Glad you finally made it out!

Ron
Not to hijack, how much boost, timing and I assume E85 still? Had you turned it up from last outings?
Old 07-19-2014, 09:32 AM
  #118  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (2)
 
Hank Peabody's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Abilene TX
Posts: 667
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 13 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 69-chvl
How do some folks get boost off the line...
100% converter! I recommend the $450 turbo converter from PTC. There are lots of others.

Great results Vince!
Old 07-19-2014, 09:56 AM
  #119  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (11)
 
69-chvl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: THORNTON, PA (NEAR PHILLY)
Posts: 1,620
Received 31 Likes on 23 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Doug F
Hey Vince,
Glad you got it to the track. If it's 3600 lbs, I agree with Ron, it's making more than 500 RWHP. The fuel flow will tell the story. Sure don't need WM to cool things.

You can't really say you have "1100" and "400" drop as the shift RPM was quite a bit higher on the 1-2. If you shift higher RPM, the drops will be "more", but not at the RPM points you want possibly. It's all about getting the shift RPM and recovery RPM where you want it. On my car I shift at 7000-7200 and with my tighter converter, it drops to about 6000 RPM. If I shifted at 6k, I'd have no drop. So its about putting the RPM range where you want it as you go down the track (as you know).

So if you want to shift at 5800, the converter is probably too loose. If you up the shifts to say 6300-6400, might be better, assuming you make power there, which I think you make power down low.

Right converter and T brake and you have mid 9's.
Gotcha on the shift rpms/points...it just doesn't feel like a whole lot is going on in 3rd gear...like a snowmobile as Hankpeabody once stated lol!!

Fuel flow was around 422lbs. I disconnected the meth on some of the 1/8 mile runs and mph picked up by 1mph, but that within the margin of error AFAIC. Also, I started with the AFR at 11.6. Went to 11.3 and then to 12.0 - no change. I really wanted to make a run w/o the air filter but was running out of time and was worried the boost would shoot-up past 16psi and didn't want to risk a breakdown 40 miles from home.

Its definitely a riot though...couple times mid-track the car started to break loose and I had to get out of it.
Old 07-19-2014, 09:59 AM
  #120  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (11)
 
69-chvl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: THORNTON, PA (NEAR PHILLY)
Posts: 1,620
Received 31 Likes on 23 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by LILHEMI
that mph with the weight you gave is 676whp. not too shabby. i ran 9.96@134 so if you can get the car sorted it will run 9s very easily.
Thanks dude!

Originally Posted by Hank Peabody
100% converter! I recommend the $450 turbo converter from PTC. There are lots of others.

Great results Vince!
Yeah I think I need to do something. 1st thing (just thought of this now) is I should of disconnected the vac mod to make sure boost wasn't f-ing with the trans. I think its OK but need to make sure. I have one of those trans-go valves which may or may not be venting enough.


Quick Reply: SN95 5.3 TH400 3.27 build thread - 10.88/134.86 - NOW LQ9



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:35 AM.