Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

2002 twin turbo t4 5.3

Old 05-13-2014, 10:44 PM
  #1  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
hy35f2t's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default 2002 twin turbo t4 5.3

I have a 5.3 im going to twin turbo with truck manifolds in my 99 ranger im running twin s475 turbos hotside is a t4 divided .90 ar im going to be running 93 octane and a th400 with 2:73's . Was curious if anyone has run similar engine turbo setup and what type of power you were making and how was spool time?
Old 05-13-2014, 10:46 PM
  #2  
Teching In
 
NastyTBSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Cleburne tx.
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

It'll be laggy, but sounds like a blast!!
Old 05-14-2014, 06:49 AM
  #3  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (12)
 
LS1NOVA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Minneapolis,MN
Posts: 2,269
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts

Default

Nitrous!
Old 05-14-2014, 07:18 AM
  #4  
Restricted User
 
JoeNova's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Ohio
Posts: 7,194
Received 104 Likes on 87 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by hy35f2t
I have a 5.3 im going to twin turbo with truck manifolds in my 99 ranger im running twin s475 turbos hotside is a t4 divided .90 ar im going to be running 93 octane and a th400 with 2:73's . Was curious if anyone has run similar engine turbo setup and what type of power you were making and how was spool time?
If its stock internals, one 475 would make enough power to pop that stock engine. I really don't see the need for 2, especially since they are rated to around 1000 HP each.

Lag? Don't expect to see boost until 4 grand. Full boost won't hit until somewhere well north of there.
Old 05-14-2014, 07:28 AM
  #5  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
Forcefed86's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 7,849
Received 676 Likes on 499 Posts

Default

I'd agree 2 S475's are a poor choice on a 5.3... Heavy and take up a tone of space as well. Get yourself some 60-62 range small T4s. You'll be much happier.

Unless you plan to fill the block and run 40+lbs on a built motor.

Last edited by Forcefed86; 05-14-2014 at 09:42 AM.
Old 05-14-2014, 10:33 AM
  #6  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
hy35f2t's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Well im thinking of going 6.0 afterwords. I picked up this 5.3 for $125 bucks.
Old 05-14-2014, 10:52 AM
  #7  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (10)
 
krwyellowZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Peoria IL
Posts: 340
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Power will be great. Should hit full boost by some time next week.

You might want to do some more research on what works in real life, first.
Old 05-14-2014, 10:53 AM
  #8  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
Forcefed86's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 7,849
Received 676 Likes on 499 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by hy35f2t
Well im thinking of going 6.0 afterwords. I picked up this 5.3 for $125 bucks.
Not much difference, still way to much turbo. One T6 S475 is all you'd need, even with a 6.0 on pump gas. Small T4 60-63mm twins would be plenty for a twin setup as well.
Old 05-14-2014, 11:00 AM
  #9  
TECH Apprentice
 
66Chevellelq4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Torrance Ca
Posts: 362
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Wink

Heres a thought, instead of waiting 10 years for your car to get into boost, just run a single s475 and sell me the other one
Old 05-14-2014, 11:18 AM
  #10  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (19)
 
oscs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Cypress, TX
Posts: 3,903
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Forcefed86
Not much difference, still way to much turbo. One T6 S475 is all you'd need, even with a 6.0 on pump gas. Small T4 60-63mm twins would be plenty for a twin setup as well.
Old 05-14-2014, 03:44 PM
  #11  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
hy35f2t's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Has anyone actually run twins of that size or is everybody just giving an opinion?
Old 05-14-2014, 04:16 PM
  #12  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (19)
 
oscs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Cypress, TX
Posts: 3,903
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by hy35f2t
Has anyone actually run twins of that size or is everybody just giving an opinion?
What are you going to be doing with the car?
Old 05-14-2014, 04:25 PM
  #13  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
Forcefed86's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 7,849
Received 676 Likes on 499 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by hy35f2t
Has anyone actually run twins of that size or is everybody just giving an opinion?
I haven’t ever tried to put an S475 on my lawn mower, but I know it won’t work well. Research turbo sizing a little and you would know twin S475’s on a low boost pump gas 5.3 is about as ridiculous.
Old 05-14-2014, 04:33 PM
  #14  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (10)
 
krwyellowZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Peoria IL
Posts: 340
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Believe it or not, there is a lot of math, formulas, and design behind making a good turbo system work. Sure, you can bolt any turbo onto any engine and get some sort of result, but that's a poor way to do things.

It sounds like you need to do more research and understand what a turbo is/does, beyond "exhast spins this side, and the other side pushes air into the engine".
Old 05-14-2014, 06:02 PM
  #15  
Teching In
iTrader: (1)
 
Bimmerdude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Most people here run a single S475 and report fantastic results with decent spool.

Those who run twin S366's on a 5.3 often report significant lag and ultimately make less power under the curve than the single setups. Those who run the even smaller (still not small) turbos being recommended usually succeed.

I'm putting twin T3/T4 (T04b covers) turbos on, the little 58 mm turbos, and will grab some S256's down the road, but for 700 whp max I can reach my goals with about any of those (obviously a trade-off, my car is a daily so I want instant spool).



I am curious (and not to threadjack, I think its relevant) - is there a reason everyone assumes twin T4 housings are needed, or that a single T6 is? T3 housings can make over 800 whp EACH before they start to choke, I'd imagine a twin scroll T4 is a bit north of that and an open scroll significantly north.
Old 05-14-2014, 06:02 PM
  #16  
Restricted User
 
JoeNova's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Ohio
Posts: 7,194
Received 104 Likes on 87 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by hy35f2t
Has anyone actually run twins of that size or is everybody just giving an opinion?
It doesn't change the fact that you're putting 2000 HP worth of turbos on a 5.3/6.0. Not only that, but the Borg Warners are much much bigger in physical size than other similar wheel turbos. You might as well load that engine with a 4 stage 1700 shot of nitrous.
Old 05-14-2014, 08:39 PM
  #17  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
Forcefed86's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 7,849
Received 676 Likes on 499 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Bimmerdude
Most people here run a single S475 and report fantastic results with decent spool.

Those who run twin S366's on a 5.3 often report significant lag and ultimately make less power under the curve than the single setups. Those who run the even smaller (still not small) turbos being recommended usually succeed.

I'm putting twin T3/T4 (T04b covers) turbos on, the little 58 mm turbos, and will grab some S256's down the road, but for 700 whp max I can reach my goals with about any of those (obviously a trade-off, my car is a daily so I want instant spool).



I am curious (and not to threadjack, I think its relevant) - is there a reason everyone assumes twin T4 housings are needed, or that a single T6 is? T3 housings can make over 800 whp EACH before they start to choke, I'd imagine a twin scroll T4 is a bit north of that and an open scroll significantly north.
The turbine exit measurement on a T3 is very tiny. A .63AR T3 and a .63AR T4 Will have different measurements in the scroll or volute. Generally accepted that less back pressure will produce more power. The amount of power the T3 can produce depends on the engine you put it on and the pressure ratio it is run at. I'm not aware of any single T3 capable of 800hp on a 5.3 liter engine. I believe all T3's would "choke" well before that point. There is a 5.3 build on here that made 700ftlb I believe on a twin 58mm T3's (china cheapies) at 19-20psi on E85 though.
Old 05-15-2014, 08:40 AM
  #18  
Teching In
 
copo-rat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Forcefed86
There is a 5.3 build on here that made 700ftlb I believe on a twin 58mm T3's (china cheapies) at 19-20psi on E85 though.
Would LOVE to find that thread.....that sounds right up my alley (minus the Chinese turbos)!
Old 05-15-2014, 09:06 AM
  #19  
On The Tree
iTrader: (2)
 
norotor7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Peoria,IL
Posts: 177
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Bimmerdude
Those who run twin S366's on a 5.3 often report significant lag and ultimately make less power under the curve than the single setups. Those who run the even smaller (still not small) turbos being recommended usually succeed.
Got any links to these laggy S366 setups? I'm not doubting you, just looking for more info.
Old 05-15-2014, 09:31 AM
  #20  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
Forcefed86's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 7,849
Received 676 Likes on 499 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by copo-rat
Would LOVE to find that thread.....that sounds right up my alley (minus the Chinese turbos)!
https://ls1tech.com/forums/forced-in...st-outing.html

23psi (falling to20 and holding) 10deg of timing, e85
air to air intercooled


stock cam
stock 5.3l just springs and studs,
kmj studs, and pac1218 springs.
re-used the stock head gaskets.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SunIR...ature=youtu.be

650rwhp 700ftlbs
th400 tranny

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: 2002 twin turbo t4 5.3



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:08 AM.