Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

Supercharger vs Turbo.... OFFICIAL ARGUMENT THREAD.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-20-2016, 09:57 PM
  #241  
UNDER PRESSURE MOD
Thread Starter
iTrader: (19)
 
The Alchemist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Doylestown PA
Posts: 10,813
Received 13 Likes on 10 Posts

Default

So Game ova, how much power does your car make?

...and I'm sorry, it's hard to take you serious when you bought a completed project and didn't build it yourself, but that's just me.
Old 07-20-2016, 10:10 PM
  #242  
TECH Junkie
 
Game ova's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 3,011
Received 47 Likes on 43 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by The Alchemist
So Game ova, how much power does your car make?

...and I'm sorry, it's hard to take you serious when you bought a completed project and didn't build it yourself, but that's just me.
Would you take me serious if I passed on a 2000 ss with 55k on the odometer, that was in really good shape...that made 810/875 with a forged bottom end for 15,. Only to do it myself and and spend double? Not sure if this counts, but I pulled the motor last month and rebuilt it. Now, with the same tune and on a Mustang dyno as opposed to last time (dynojet) it makes 820/908. But now I'm at a crossroad.....either make the car run a number....or just keep it to being a fun street car. Only ran 11.83 @135 last outing. Wasn't all in....but still not really fast. And btw this is on a VERY soft tuneup....14 degree on E85.
Attached Thumbnails Supercharger vs Turbo.... OFFICIAL ARGUMENT THREAD.-20160708_164714.jpg   Supercharger vs Turbo.... OFFICIAL ARGUMENT THREAD.-20160708_161830.jpg   Supercharger vs Turbo.... OFFICIAL ARGUMENT THREAD.-20160607_135157.jpg   Supercharger vs Turbo.... OFFICIAL ARGUMENT THREAD.-20160604_200025.jpg   Supercharger vs Turbo.... OFFICIAL ARGUMENT THREAD.-20160601_082411.jpg  

Supercharger vs Turbo.... OFFICIAL ARGUMENT THREAD.-20160602_175821.jpg   Supercharger vs Turbo.... OFFICIAL ARGUMENT THREAD.-20160530_161759.jpg  

Last edited by Game ova; 07-20-2016 at 10:43 PM.
Old 07-20-2016, 10:18 PM
  #243  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (18)
 
98_WS6_M6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: NW Indiana
Posts: 1,296
Received 98 Likes on 76 Posts

Default

To each their own. I love the sound of my procharger. One of my fav parts about starting the car. And with an LS1 with a D1 and stock heads intake, small exhaust through an auto and 9" rear made 630/605 and ran 10.49@129 (131 best mph) consistently just launching off idle. It's not all about power made. Anyways I'm sticking with Prochargers. My next move will he F1A once I meet my ET goals. It really seems more like a personal preference to me.
Old 07-21-2016, 01:17 AM
  #244  
8 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (32)
 
Blown06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 5,181
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by The Alchemist
So Game ova, how much power does your car make?

...and I'm sorry, it's hard to take you serious when you bought a completed project and didn't build it yourself, but that's just me.
Game ova make some points that could be valid, however most of what he types is just his opinion.

Game ova,

You can't knock a particular set up because "you" don't like the way it sounds. You can't knock a set up or claim to have done something the right way if you didn't do it. You bought it that way. Which is totally fine. That is the cheapest way, but don't comment with your opinions if all you have ever done is drive a car.
Old 07-21-2016, 01:46 AM
  #245  
TECH Junkie
 
Game ova's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 3,011
Received 47 Likes on 43 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Blown06
Game ova make some points that could be valid, however most of what he types is just his opinion.

Game ova,

You can't knock a particular set up because "you" don't like the way it sounds. You can't knock a set up or claim to have done something the right way if you didn't do it. You bought it that way. Which is totally fine. That is the cheapest way, but don't comment with your opinions if all you have ever done is drive a car.
Well, lets look at this. Who's setup have I "knocked"? And the assumption that "all I've ever done is drive a car" is the furthest thing from the truth. I've spent MANY late nights turning wrenches over the years. The ONLY car I've ever had built was my last lt1 car. ..and that was only because at the time I had nowhere to do the work. I just happened upon this car, and for the money...I would have been a fool to pass on it. And for the record I NEVER knock another man's car....be it fast or slow. It's just not something I do. Being that this is a turbo vs supercharger thread. ....I guess there's a lot of "knocking " going on. And one more thing, when did I make ANY claim of doing it "the right way"? What WAS said was this. ...keeping ac and powersteering is easily done". As well as running the exhaust out the back.

Last edited by Game ova; 07-21-2016 at 02:03 AM.
Old 07-21-2016, 05:59 AM
  #246  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (10)
 
alocker's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: NW Chicago Burbs
Posts: 1,167
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 98_WS6_M6
To each their own. I love the sound of my procharger. One of my fav parts about starting the car. And with an LS1 with a D1 and stock heads intake, small exhaust through an auto and 9" rear made 630/605 and ran 10.49@129 (131 best mph) consistently just launching off idle. It's not all about power made. Anyways I'm sticking with Prochargers. My next move will he F1A once I meet my ET goals. It really seems more like a personal preference to me.
I have a turbo and I ain't changing but building boost and launching with it is a downside. I don't have much track time on my car but a finicky 2 step and not wanting to install a brake makes staging "annoying". I would love to be able to roll up and mash the gas while hammering nice 60's.
Old 07-21-2016, 06:36 AM
  #247  
UNDER PRESSURE MOD
Thread Starter
iTrader: (19)
 
The Alchemist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Doylestown PA
Posts: 10,813
Received 13 Likes on 10 Posts

Default

I guess if we are posting dyno graphs... here's what mine looked like. You can see the torque flatten as my tires spun on the dyno, but that's my fault for trying to run a 19" tire.
This was only 13.5 degrees of timing as well....



I have no doubt that if I could have put a better tire on the car, I would have been close to 800 ft/lbs of torque, maybe more. I also discovered that I installed my idler pulley for the blower in the wrong position, causing the tensioner to bottom out, so I was losing boost.... not a big deal. I moved the idler, and now it makes 18.5psi compared to when I dyno'd only making 16psi. 2.5psi should be good for a few more ponies. To that point, I'm not even at max rpm for the blower, and it's a solid 900rwhp setup.

Last edited by The Alchemist; 07-21-2016 at 06:49 AM.
Old 07-21-2016, 07:49 AM
  #248  
LS1Tech Sponsor
iTrader: (16)
 
Bob@BruteSpeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Roanoke, IN
Posts: 21,006
Received 31 Likes on 26 Posts

Thumbs up

Originally Posted by The Alchemist
I guess if we are posting dyno graphs... here's what mine looked like. You can see the torque flatten as my tires spun on the dyno, but that's my fault for trying to run a 19" tire.
This was only 13.5 degrees of timing as well....



I have no doubt that if I could have put a better tire on the car, I would have been close to 800 ft/lbs of torque, maybe more. I also discovered that I installed my idler pulley for the blower in the wrong position, causing the tensioner to bottom out, so I was losing boost.... not a big deal. I moved the idler, and now it makes 18.5psi compared to when I dyno'd only making 16psi. 2.5psi should be good for a few more ponies. To that point, I'm not even at max rpm for the blower, and it's a solid 900rwhp setup.
Dang, that should now make a lot more power!!! Bob
__________________
ATI ProCharger and Moser Sales 260 672-2076

PM's disabled, please e-mail me
E-mail: brutespeed@gmail.comob@brutespeed.com

https://brutespeed.com/ Link to website


Old 07-21-2016, 08:50 AM
  #249  
TECH Junkie
 
Game ova's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 3,011
Received 47 Likes on 43 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by The Alchemist
I guess if we are posting dyno graphs... here's what mine looked like. You can see the torque flatten as my tires spun on the dyno, but that's my fault for trying to run a 19" tire.
This was only 13.5 degrees of timing as well....



I have no doubt that if I could have put a better tire on the car, I would have been close to 800 ft/lbs of torque, maybe more. I also discovered that I installed my idler pulley for the blower in the wrong position, causing the tensioner to bottom out, so I was losing boost.... not a big deal. I moved the idler, and now it makes 18.5psi compared to when I dyno'd only making 16psi. 2.5psi should be good for a few more ponies. To that point, I'm not even at max rpm for the blower, and it's a solid 900rwhp setup.
Old 07-21-2016, 09:04 AM
  #250  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (18)
 
98_WS6_M6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: NW Indiana
Posts: 1,296
Received 98 Likes on 76 Posts

Default

You have an awesome setup Alchemist. Congrats on those redults. Def sounds like more left in it too. I'll probably need another block before I get those type of numbers lol
Old 07-21-2016, 09:41 AM
  #251  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (13)
 
SLOW SEDAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: No VA
Posts: 4,025
Received 945 Likes on 701 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by The Alchemist
I guess if we are posting dyno graphs... here's what mine looked like. You can see the torque flatten as my tires spun on the dyno, but that's my fault for trying to run a 19" tire.
This was only 13.5 degrees of timing as well....



I have no doubt that if I could have put a better tire on the car, I would have been close to 800 ft/lbs of torque, maybe more. I also discovered that I installed my idler pulley for the blower in the wrong position, causing the tensioner to bottom out, so I was losing boost.... not a big deal. I moved the idler, and now it makes 18.5psi compared to when I dyno'd only making 16psi. 2.5psi should be good for a few more ponies. To that point, I'm not even at max rpm for the blower, and it's a solid 900rwhp setup.
Why does it fall off so hard? Looks like its diving down ~6300RPM, perhaps due to the belt problems you spoke of?
Old 07-21-2016, 09:54 AM
  #252  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (13)
 
SLOW SEDAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: No VA
Posts: 4,025
Received 945 Likes on 701 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by alocker
I have a turbo and I ain't changing but building boost and launching with it is a downside. I don't have much track time on my car but a finicky 2 step and not wanting to install a brake makes staging "annoying". I would love to be able to roll up and mash the gas while hammering nice 60's.
Your turbo should come online quickly on the footbrake, if it doesn't your tune probably needs a going over. A T4 S75 on a 6L should zing! I had a T6 S480 on a little 5.3 and it spun it up quick. I could easily hit 10lbs on the footbrake, no 2 step, no trans brake, just give it some gas and go. Really was no issue running 1.4-1.5 60' in a heavy car.
Old 07-21-2016, 10:34 AM
  #253  
UNDER PRESSURE MOD
Thread Starter
iTrader: (19)
 
The Alchemist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Doylestown PA
Posts: 10,813
Received 13 Likes on 10 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by SLOW SEDAN
Why does it fall off so hard? Looks like its diving down ~6300RPM, perhaps due to the belt problems you spoke of?
I have no doubt it was the belt slipping. My boost actually dropped from 6400-6800rpm from 16psi to 15psi. Also, only having 13.5 degrees of timing hurt it a little as well.
Old 07-21-2016, 11:36 AM
  #254  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (5)
 
necrocannibal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Memphis,TN
Posts: 1,500
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 8 Posts


Default

My cousin has a supercharged Trans Am. I took my car over to let him ride in it and eventually he drove it the same day. I left to go home and I get a text saying he just purchased a turbo kit for it.

He said he liked how the turbo didn't feel linear to him like the supercharger does.
Old 07-21-2016, 11:59 AM
  #255  
UNDER PRESSURE MOD
Thread Starter
iTrader: (19)
 
The Alchemist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Doylestown PA
Posts: 10,813
Received 13 Likes on 10 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by necrocannibal
My cousin has a supercharged Trans Am. I took my car over to let him ride in it and eventually he drove it the same day. I left to go home and I get a text saying he just purchased a turbo kit for it.

He said he liked how the turbo didn't feel linear to him like the supercharger does.
To that point, I like how the supercharger feels linear, and it doesn't shock the suspension or tires like a turbo or nitrous would.

It's all about preference and desired outcome.

Old 07-21-2016, 12:03 PM
  #256  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (5)
 
necrocannibal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Memphis,TN
Posts: 1,500
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 8 Posts


Default

It wasn't a derogatory comment at all I was just giving his opinion from someone who owns one vs driving a different set up. It really is a personal preference thing in my opinion.
Old 07-21-2016, 12:31 PM
  #257  
TECH Junkie
 
Game ova's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 3,011
Received 47 Likes on 43 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 98_WS6_M6
You have an awesome setup Alchemist. Congrats on those redults. Def sounds like more left in it too. I'll probably need another block before I get those type of numbers lol
What is it about your block that is preventing you from making 900rwhp?
Old 07-21-2016, 01:39 PM
  #258  
TECH Junkie
 
Game ova's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 3,011
Received 47 Likes on 43 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by The Alchemist
I have no doubt it was the belt slipping. My boost actually dropped from 6400-6800rpm from 16psi to 15psi. Also, only having 13.5 degrees of timing hurt it a little as well.
And this is just one of many reasons turbos reign over superchargers. My belt has never slipped on any turbo car I've ever owned.....OR my work truck.
Old 07-21-2016, 01:40 PM
  #259  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (18)
 
98_WS6_M6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: NW Indiana
Posts: 1,296
Received 98 Likes on 76 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by The Alchemist
To that point, I like how the supercharger feels linear, and it doesn't shock the suspension or tires like a turbo or nitrous would.

It's all about preference and desired outcome.

Originally Posted by necrocannibal
It wasn't a derogatory comment at all I was just giving his opinion from someone who owns one vs driving a different set up. It really is a personal preference thing in my opinion.
I like the linear feel as well and I've road in some nice turbo cars for sure. Like we said. It's really a personal opinion
Old 07-21-2016, 01:43 PM
  #260  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (18)
 
98_WS6_M6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: NW Indiana
Posts: 1,296
Received 98 Likes on 76 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Game ova
What is it about your block that is preventing you from making 900rwhp?
It's just an LS1 block. Lots of opinions out there but it seems about 850 is the max you should push it and I'm sure a few guys in here would say don't even push it that far

Originally Posted by Game ova
And this is just one of many reasons turbos reign over superchargers. My belt has never slipped on any turbo car I've ever owned.....OR my work truck.
Yeah but he said it was because he installed his tensioner pulley wrong. If you install something incorrectly on an NA car it won't run properly either.

As far as installs it seems to me that superchargers are way easier to install and tune than turbos so that's a plus for superchargers IMO


Quick Reply: Supercharger vs Turbo.... OFFICIAL ARGUMENT THREAD.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:59 PM.