Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

Scraping my cx racing intercooler. What's next?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-23-2017, 05:49 PM
  #41  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
DBRODS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 368
Likes: 0
Received 43 Likes on 24 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by stevieturbo
I presume that's their 5.5" thick core ? ie the biggest they offer ?
Its actually two of the 10x12x4.5 cores welded together. So its 10" tall and 24" wide and 4.5" thick.
part number 703521-6003
Old 08-23-2017, 05:52 PM
  #42  
9 Second Club
 
stevieturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Norn Iron
Posts: 13,616
Received 180 Likes on 155 Posts

Default

That must be vertical flow ?
Old 08-23-2017, 05:54 PM
  #43  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
DBRODS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 368
Likes: 0
Received 43 Likes on 24 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by stevieturbo
That must be vertical flow ?
Yes it is.
Old 08-23-2017, 06:10 PM
  #44  
9 Second Club
 
stevieturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Norn Iron
Posts: 13,616
Received 180 Likes on 155 Posts

Default

ok cool.
Old 08-23-2017, 06:20 PM
  #45  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (13)
 
SLOW SEDAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: No VA
Posts: 4,025
Received 945 Likes on 701 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Nitroused383
I wouldn't waste my money on treadstone, too many guys who push their setups hard report really high iats. My custom garrett core was $800 shipped all the way across the US. Chiseled Performance is the ****, you draw up any mounts, bosses or whatever and he will do it. Nothing compares to Garrett fin density
No doubt the Garrett is nicer but I didn't think sub 140 degree IAT was too bad from a $300 cooler on 27+ PSI on my old setup.

Just for ***** I went from no intercooler to the Treadstone and it dropped IAT's from 220+ down to mid 120's. So while I know the Garrett works well it's also more then twice as expensive as the Treadstone. However, I'm not sure the Garrett works twice as well for the dollar spent and on E85 I'm also not sure the super cool IAT's are really needed. For an unlimited budget build I'd have a Garrett core in a hot second, but I would also have a lot nicer engine! For a clapped out 5.3 build and cheap turbos I think the Treadstone fits right in.
Old 08-24-2017, 08:25 AM
  #46  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (13)
 
SLOW SEDAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: No VA
Posts: 4,025
Received 945 Likes on 701 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by DBRODS
I did back to back testing a few years ago with treadstone vs a garret core. The treadstone was junk compared to the garrett.

Heres the data.

https://ls1tech.com/forums/forced-in...l#post17843058
For those looking at these results factor in the cooling area on the Garrett core increased 28% over the Treadstone. That 28% larger core resulted in being 32 degrees cooler at 17-18PSI.

Would be nice to see a comparison with a similar sized Treadstone to see if it splits the difference and if 16 degrees is worth over double the price?
Old 08-24-2017, 09:40 AM
  #47  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
DBRODS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 368
Likes: 0
Received 43 Likes on 24 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by SLOW SEDAN
For those looking at these results factor in the cooling area on the Garrett core increased 28% over the Treadstone. That 28% larger core resulted in being 32 degrees cooler at 17-18PSI.

Would be nice to see a comparison with a similar sized Treadstone to see if it splits the difference and if 16 degrees is worth over double the price?
Yes its a little bigger but that's the closest I could find at the time. The Treadstone core is 350.00 and the 2 of the Garretts is 554.00. I would gladly pay 204.00 more for a better performing intercooler that nets more HP. I feel like the treadstone was becoming worthless over 24psi on my setup. Especially during the summer when starting IATs are 100* and its gaining 80* above that. My timing table starts pulling at 150* so less timing on top of less dense air adds up to a lot of power left on the table.
Old 08-24-2017, 10:13 AM
  #48  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (3)
 
slowride's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: New Hartford, IA
Posts: 844
Received 79 Likes on 68 Posts

Default

Did you happen to have a pre intercooler pressure tap at all? Just curious of the delta on both. Thanks for the data.
Old 08-24-2017, 10:35 AM
  #49  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
DBRODS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 368
Likes: 0
Received 43 Likes on 24 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by slowride
Did you happen to have a pre intercooler pressure tap at all? Just curious of the delta on both. Thanks for the data.
I didn't when I had the treadstone. I assume the pressure was pretty high since the turbonetics wouldn't make anymore power above 31psi. Since switching to Holley dominator and PTE turbos I added a pre sensor and pressure is even at 37psi.
Old 08-24-2017, 10:51 AM
  #50  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (13)
 
SLOW SEDAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: No VA
Posts: 4,025
Received 945 Likes on 701 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by DBRODS
Yes its a little bigger but that's the closest I could find at the time. The Treadstone core is 350.00 and the 2 of the Garretts is 554.00. I would gladly pay 204.00 more for a better performing intercooler that nets more HP. I feel like the treadstone was becoming worthless over 24psi on my setup. Especially during the summer when starting IATs are 100* and its gaining 80* above that. My timing table starts pulling at 150* so less timing on top of less dense air adds up to a lot of power left on the table.
Understand, however it seems most in this market are looking for cheap complete intercoolers that work well enough. A lot of people use the TR1245 that comes with end tanks without needing fabrication. If we factor in fabrication the price rises a good bit in comparison. The Garrett intercooler I looked at they wanted north of $1000 assembled, another place was $1400 customized to fit better. While it would probably work better and gain a few hp its hard to justify when the $400 unit works pretty well and I haven't tapped out the current setup yet.

Personally I wouldn't pull timing that low unless you ran really shitty fuel which I doubt you do on that boost level. On E85 we don't pull timing until a good bit above that, haven't seen any negative impacts yet. I saw 240* IAT without an intercooler and I didn't start pulling timing until 200.



Quick Reply: Scraping my cx racing intercooler. What's next?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:08 AM.