Ddnspider's- Project Wrong-Way- Rear Mount Turbo Thread
Lingenfelter uses the early Colorado style maf so it isnt a card its more of a straw so it samples to itself not just a wafer in the wind so to speak.
Or at least they did. Its a pretty nice setup and has had better results from what Ive personally seen and done. I think the Colorado maf doesnt need iat table adjusted but i could be wrong.
But the spectre tube is nice and cheap as well. And now ebay and amazon are flooded with them.
Or at least they did. Its a pretty nice setup and has had better results from what Ive personally seen and done. I think the Colorado maf doesnt need iat table adjusted but i could be wrong.
But the spectre tube is nice and cheap as well. And now ebay and amazon are flooded with them.
The quality hitachi etc are $45+ from say rockauto and they would normally only use a delco likely which are higher obviously.
I put a few in from 2012 to 2015 most like the ls7 but the way the straw design works it directs the sample to it. Much better design and less area used. Quite a good design and doesn't look like it would need a straightener since it brings the air to it.
Delco 2131585
Compact and great design.
It would likey use a ford style maf sensor housing/adapter which spectre has as well. So still relatively inexpensive.
I put a few in from 2012 to 2015 most like the ls7 but the way the straw design works it directs the sample to it. Much better design and less area used. Quite a good design and doesn't look like it would need a straightener since it brings the air to it.
Delco 2131585
Compact and great design.
It would likey use a ford style maf sensor housing/adapter which spectre has as well. So still relatively inexpensive.
Greg, @turbolx , can you shed some light on what you've got for videos on the Gen 4 PCM?
I've been fighting a fuel pressure drop issue. It was originally with a single 255, no surprise. Swapped to a Walbro 450 and continued to have issues. Did a hotwire hit and added another 255 in parallel. Now base pressure is much higher but it still drops during WOT, but at least I'm able to keep a reasonable AFR. Running out of ideas on what could be dropping the fuel pressure. I even replaced the stock in-tank regulator. I'm logging fuel pressure at the shraeder valve on the stock rails. Only other thing I can think of is clogged fuel filter so swapping that too.
With all that said, its hazing the 315 tires in 3rd gear.....and spool is GREAT now. Loving this setup! Just need to resolve this fuel drop issue.
With all that said, its hazing the 315 tires in 3rd gear.....and spool is GREAT now. Loving this setup! Just need to resolve this fuel drop issue.
are you logging fuel pressure and injector duty cycle? any correlate-able data there? what does dropping the base pressure do?
you might just be at the point where a real boost ref'd reg is needed,. sure helped my old set up...even just deadheaded to the rails it was like night and day
you might just be at the point where a real boost ref'd reg is needed,. sure helped my old set up...even just deadheaded to the rails it was like night and day
are you logging fuel pressure and injector duty cycle? any correlate-able data there? what does dropping the base pressure do?
you might just be at the point where a real boost ref'd reg is needed,. sure helped my old set up...even just deadheaded to the rails it was like night and day
you might just be at the point where a real boost ref'd reg is needed,. sure helped my old set up...even just deadheaded to the rails it was like night and day
are you logging fuel pressure and injector duty cycle? any correlate-able data there? what does dropping the base pressure do?
you might just be at the point where a real boost ref'd reg is needed,. sure helped my old set up...even just deadheaded to the rails it was like night and day
you might just be at the point where a real boost ref'd reg is needed,. sure helped my old set up...even just deadheaded to the rails it was like night and day
. Essentially the higher g/sec in the MAF transfer function is fudging to account for the drop in fuel pressure which in tern skews fuel injector flow rate. It's "working" I would just prefer it to not drop so I can enter correct airflow values. I've been fighting a fuel pressure drop issue. It was originally with a single 255, no surprise. Swapped to a Walbro 450 and continued to have issues. Did a hotwire hit and added another 255 in parallel. Now base pressure is much higher but it still drops during WOT, but at least I'm able to keep a reasonable AFR. Running out of ideas on what could be dropping the fuel pressure. I even replaced the stock in-tank regulator. I'm logging fuel pressure at the shraeder valve on the stock rails. Only other thing I can think of is clogged fuel filter so swapping that too.
With all that said, its hazing the 315 tires in 3rd gear.....and spool is GREAT now. Loving this setup! Just need to resolve this fuel drop issue.
With all that said, its hazing the 315 tires in 3rd gear.....and spool is GREAT now. Loving this setup! Just need to resolve this fuel drop issue.
Although a sensor placed local to the pumps may reveal more, in case somehow there is a huge drop from rear to front
Wouldnt that mean that the regulator would let MORE fuel to the rail, not less? Interesting idea of getting a sensor at the pumps.
Hard to know what it might do if it cannot cope. But the inflated pressure at the low end, to reduced pressure at the top end...something is amiss.
I assume it is not adjustable ?
Clearly on any line there will be a pressure drop. The longer the line the more drop, the thinner the more drop, and also the more that is consumed at the end the more drop.
Dead end systems can work for good power, but the line size would probably need to be larger than for say a full flow system where the reg is close to the injectors. And the reg near the pumps would probably need to be more capable too, as it's working in a less than ideal location.
I assume it is not adjustable ?
Clearly on any line there will be a pressure drop. The longer the line the more drop, the thinner the more drop, and also the more that is consumed at the end the more drop.
Dead end systems can work for good power, but the line size would probably need to be larger than for say a full flow system where the reg is close to the injectors. And the reg near the pumps would probably need to be more capable too, as it's working in a less than ideal location.
I'm pretty sure people have done 800whp on a stock fuel line and rails, I'm guessing I'm around 600whp so more than enough room, but obviously something is amiss. I replaced the intank regulator thinking maybe it was leaking and bleeding pressure it didn't do the trick. It is not adjustable or boost referenced. Just very odd.
I'm pretty sure people have done 800whp on a stock fuel line and rails, I'm guessing I'm around 600whp so more than enough room, but obviously something is amiss. I replaced the intank regulator thinking maybe it was leaking and bleeding pressure it didn't do the trick. It is not adjustable or boost referenced. Just very odd.
But was their pressure stable ? Not boost referenced ? other ?
Seems common cause after pump changes etc was leakages on the pipe from pump to hanger ?
Whilst you dont want to see pressure drop....as long as it isnt silly low ( factoring in FP from MAP ), and it is always repeatable....is it really a problem ? Not ideal of course, but not necessarily a problem.
It's only when it changes behaviour to unexpected it becomes a problem.
I'm sure you could do more on stock lines and rails.
But was their pressure stable ? Not boost referenced ? other ?
Seems common cause after pump changes etc was leakages on the pipe from pump to hanger ?
Whilst you dont want to see pressure drop....as long as it isnt silly low ( factoring in FP from MAP ), and it is always repeatable....is it really a problem ? Not ideal of course, but not necessarily a problem.
It's only when it changes behaviour to unexpected it becomes a problem.
But was their pressure stable ? Not boost referenced ? other ?
Seems common cause after pump changes etc was leakages on the pipe from pump to hanger ?
Whilst you dont want to see pressure drop....as long as it isnt silly low ( factoring in FP from MAP ), and it is always repeatable....is it really a problem ? Not ideal of course, but not necessarily a problem.
It's only when it changes behaviour to unexpected it becomes a problem.
if the reg cannot cope with the flow of the larger pumps at low loads, not surprising pressure is high there.
IMO that higher pressure is more indicative of that problem.
If base pressure for that reg should be 58psi....then you're only losing 8psi at higher loads.....less of an error than the 12psi above at low load.
So it's not so much it's dropping 20psi....first it's inflated by 12psi, then returns to normal at some point, then falls by 8psi ? It should never be at 70psi in the first place.
50psi at the rails less what ? 10psi boost ( not sure you've mentioned how much boost ) ? other....only leaving 40psi to inject. Still not bad, but I wouldnt want much or any lower
IMO that higher pressure is more indicative of that problem.
If base pressure for that reg should be 58psi....then you're only losing 8psi at higher loads.....less of an error than the 12psi above at low load.
So it's not so much it's dropping 20psi....first it's inflated by 12psi, then returns to normal at some point, then falls by 8psi ? It should never be at 70psi in the first place.
50psi at the rails less what ? 10psi boost ( not sure you've mentioned how much boost ) ? other....only leaving 40psi to inject. Still not bad, but I wouldnt want much or any lower
That is a good way to look at it. I hadn't considered it's not really a 20 psi drop it's more like 8. I've seen other setups with Vette regulators hold higher pressure during a pull on an otherwise stock system but good thought. Yeah boost is about 10 psi.
well they tend to give you the kind of problems youre experiencing. sometimes. but not all the time. just when i use them? or only on days that end in Y?
it's a system with a lot of design constraints. change one variable and boom you got 70psi at idle, or in my case 90psi at idle
it's a system with a lot of design constraints. change one variable and boom you got 70psi at idle, or in my case 90psi at idle
well they tend to give you the kind of problems youre experiencing. sometimes. but not all the time. just when i use them? or only on days that end in Y?
it's a system with a lot of design constraints. change one variable and boom you got 70psi at idle, or in my case 90psi at idle
it's a system with a lot of design constraints. change one variable and boom you got 70psi at idle, or in my case 90psi at idle








What's do bad about Vette regs?