Gears & Axles Driveshafts | Rearends | Differentials | Gears | 12 Bolt | 9 Inch | Dana

finally a bolt-in set-up for a 8.8 for us??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-27-2008, 12:09 PM
  #1  
TECH Veteran
Thread Starter
iTrader: (32)
 
Taubr Unit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 4,146
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 6 Posts

Default finally a bolt-in set-up for a 8.8 for us??

Looking through my buddy ford magazine and seen this. A TA that bolts to the housing and you weld in the crossmember like you would a BMR it seems like. Just kinda interesting, wonder how that would work in our cars. And he said that a fox body rear is 1'' narrower on each side compared to our 10 bolts, another cool bolt in factor. Someone buy this stuff and try it, lol..............

http://www.musclemustangfastfords.co...ion/index.html
Old 11-27-2008, 01:06 PM
  #2  
Banned
 
All Black SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I think they have a pretty big market if they redesign the front to work with a common f-body tunnel mounted torque arm.

But there is still one huge obstacle, and that is getting the LCA mounts welded onto the housing in the right place. That eliminates 'a bolt in setup'

Sure it can be done, but it's far from bolt in at that point.

And the company is the leader in mustang suspensions (or so their website says) I wonder if they'd jump to an f-body design any time soon.
Old 11-27-2008, 02:31 PM
  #3  
TECH Regular
 
impaled's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: tampa
Posts: 443
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

personally i dont think the 8.8 is as good as the 9".

as AllBlack said. the fabrication required would far exceed the benefits (if any).

but being 1 inch narrower would increase wheel selection out there for drag wheels.
Old 11-27-2008, 03:05 PM
  #4  
TECH Veteran
Thread Starter
iTrader: (32)
 
Taubr Unit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 4,146
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

yea, totally forgot about the LCA's. Ok then, goes to show our TA style works better then the fox bodys since there going this far to make one, lol. f bodys win again!!
Old 11-27-2008, 04:02 PM
  #5  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (4)
 
LM97Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: S.W. Missouri
Posts: 1,291
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Stick with the 9" for the F-body, they bolt right in & are still stronger then the 8.8", if you get the moser houseing/axle package, you can have it narrowed at no extra cost apon ordering.
Old 11-27-2008, 06:42 PM
  #6  
TECH Veteran
Thread Starter
iTrader: (32)
 
Taubr Unit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 4,146
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

obviously the 9'' is stronger but a 8.8 can be picked up for practically nothing and are still strong as **** still.

But still back to the LCA issue. Just sposted this for some food for thought
Old 11-28-2008, 03:56 PM
  #7  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (13)
 
drain89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Right across the river from Huntington, WV
Posts: 698
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

If someone made a bolt in 8.8" for our cars I'd buy one in an instant. Strong enough for 99% of us. Parts are cheaper than others. Less parasitic loss. Or better yet. An 8.8 center section for a 9" housing that'll work with the torque arm bracket.
Old 11-29-2008, 12:25 AM
  #8  
Banned
 
All Black SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by drain89
Or better yet. An 8.8 center section for a 9" housing that'll work with the torque arm bracket.
HUH? The 8.8 doesn't look anything like a 9"
Old 11-29-2008, 12:31 AM
  #9  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (13)
 
drain89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Right across the river from Huntington, WV
Posts: 698
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by All Black SS
HUH? The 8.8 doesn't look anything like a 9"
Huh?? Never said it did.
Old 11-29-2008, 12:34 AM
  #10  
Banned
 
All Black SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by drain89
Huh?? Never said it did.
I'm not sure how an 8.8 center section would come close to working with a 9" housing or why.
Just wondering.
Old 11-29-2008, 12:48 AM
  #11  
TECH Veteran
Thread Starter
iTrader: (32)
 
Taubr Unit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 4,146
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

i think he just means a 8.8 style vs. the 9'' style. In turn it runs more efficient then the standard 9'' style that robs a lot of HP
Old 11-29-2008, 01:06 AM
  #12  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (13)
 
drain89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Right across the river from Huntington, WV
Posts: 698
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by taubr unit
i think he just means a 8.8 style vs. The 9'' style. In turn it runs more efficient then the standard 9'' style that robs a lot of hp
bingo!
Old 11-29-2008, 01:37 AM
  #13  
Banned
 
All Black SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Taubr Unit
i think he just means a 8.8 style vs. the 9'' style. In turn it runs more efficient then the standard 9'' style that robs a lot of HP
I understand that, it's putting the two together thats near impossible.

The R&D work on figuring that out would offset the price.
Old 12-03-2008, 05:08 PM
  #14  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (10)
 
kgkern01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 992
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

I would LOVE to have an 8.8" setup for the reasons above, less power loss, light weight, and strong enough for anything most of us would need.

Has anyone thought about possibly adapting a GM 8.5" 10 bolt GNX style?
Old 12-04-2008, 10:52 AM
  #15  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (33)
 
LS1-450's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,783
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

Please excuse my off topic interuption:


Tauber Unit,

That's a sweet lookin' 94 you got there.
Old 12-04-2008, 01:58 PM
  #16  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (7)
 
colby72olds's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Arab, Al
Posts: 1,735
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by LS1-450
Please excuse my off topic interuption:


Tauber Unit,

That's a sweet lookin' 94 you got there
.
yes it is!
Old 12-04-2008, 01:59 PM
  #17  
Banned
 
All Black SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by kgkern01
I would LOVE to have an 8.8" setup for the reasons above, less power loss, light weight, and strong enough for anything most of us would need.

Has anyone thought about possibly adapting a GM 8.5" 10 bolt GNX style?
https://secure.mysuperpageshosting.c...ages/gnx-7.gif
Holy cow thats nice!
There was a guy on here making a similiar set up out of steel, I think thats why there is (or was) a 'no talk about the 8.8' sticky up a while back. He was also cutting f body axle tubes and welding them on the ends of the 8.8. So he had a whole rear, not a bolt on set up adaption set up..

But again, the LCA's eliminate the full bolt in potential.

I can see someone making a kit that comes with f-body LCA's and some sort of locating bracket that will bolt the f body LCA brackets to the stock bracket on the original rear so the two can be bolted together to position them for welding. Then the original bracket can be cut off.

That or maybe a template of some kind. Whatever it is needs to beat the cost of a bolt in, new 12 bolt by a lot.
Old 12-04-2008, 04:35 PM
  #18  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (5)
 
nocooler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Mid Michigan
Posts: 605
Received 62 Likes on 40 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by kgkern01
I would LOVE to have an 8.8" setup for the reasons above, less power loss, light weight, and strong enough for anything most of us would need.

Has anyone thought about possibly adapting a GM 8.5" 10 bolt GNX style?
Considering there were only 547 GNX's made and the reproduction parts cost almost as much as a 9" Ford - I'd say its not cost effective.
Old 12-04-2008, 05:20 PM
  #19  
Banned
 
All Black SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by nocooler
Considering there were only 547 GNX's made and the reproduction parts cost almost as much as a 9" Ford - I'd say its not cost effective.
So thats a factory part?
Old 12-04-2008, 05:46 PM
  #20  
TECH Veteran
Thread Starter
iTrader: (32)
 
Taubr Unit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 4,146
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by LS1-450
Please excuse my off topic interuption:


Tauber Unit,

That's a sweet lookin' 94 you got there.
Originally Posted by colby72olds
yes it is!
thanks guys, been a long work in progress!!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:57 PM.