I shed a tear today...
#124
i don't think there is a reason to report anything, relax, how bout you all just settle down and save it for another day.
he isnt going to beat someone's *** for going through a car wash, he was just being sarcastic.
BTW - i know some people that wash their car by hand and end up with swirls upon swirls...they SHOULD use a touchless car wash
he isnt going to beat someone's *** for going through a car wash, he was just being sarcastic.
BTW - i know some people that wash their car by hand and end up with swirls upon swirls...they SHOULD use a touchless car wash
#125
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 32,395
Likes: 1,818
From: Schiller Park, IL Member: #317
Originally Posted by INMY01TA
Report it to a mod then. If he's banned then case closed.
If someone starts that ****, then this thread is over. Hell, it's on the verge of being done anyway.
#127
Originally Posted by RPM WS6
I don't think there was any serious threat made here.
If someone starts that ****, then this thread is over. Hell, it's on the verge of being done anyway.
If someone starts that ****, then this thread is over. Hell, it's on the verge of being done anyway.
#130
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 32,395
Likes: 1,818
From: Schiller Park, IL Member: #317
Originally Posted by taintedmeat
All joking aside guys, seriously, what's wrong with one of your standard drivethru touchless car washess? Aside from some spraying in from the t-tops they always seem to do a decent job.
I regularly wash my daily drivers in a touchless spray wash, just to get some of the dirt off between hand washes.
I would never take my Camaro to one personally, because I prefer to clean it myself by hand, but for a car that's a daily driver I really don't have a problem with it.
#131
Originally Posted by RPM WS6
I don't really see an issue with it other than what you mentioned. Potential T-top leaks under high pressure, but that's about it.
I regularly wash my daily drivers in a touchless spray wash, just to get some of the dirt off between hand washes.
I would never take my Camaro to one personally, because I prefer to clean it myself by hand, but for a car that's a daily driver I really don't have a problem with it.
I regularly wash my daily drivers in a touchless spray wash, just to get some of the dirt off between hand washes.
I would never take my Camaro to one personally, because I prefer to clean it myself by hand, but for a car that's a daily driver I really don't have a problem with it.
#132
Originally Posted by The Black Mamba
Lol. Who really cares. It's a $17,000 car on a good day. When you leave la-la land, maybe you will actually open your eyes and realize that camaros/trans ams/corvettes aren't going to be worth much. Please hurry though, I may not be around in 20 years when you finally figure it out.
By the way, I respect F-Bodies. It's just losers like you that think they're god, and put lines like "LS1, the engine touched by God" in your sigs. Get over yourself.
I know tons of people around here with legit cars, one is a 10sec camaro. They're great rides, but they aren't rare. Stop acting like they are.
By the way, I respect F-Bodies. It's just losers like you that think they're god, and put lines like "LS1, the engine touched by God" in your sigs. Get over yourself.
I know tons of people around here with legit cars, one is a 10sec camaro. They're great rides, but they aren't rare. Stop acting like they are.
if i had 200,000. i would still get a Fbody. i wouldnt even want a ****** *** ferrari.
#134
Originally Posted by bww3588
Here:
https://ls1tech.com/forums/showpost....3&postcount=81
Here:
https://ls1tech.com/forums/showpost....0&postcount=84
Here is RPM WS6 proving you wrong:
https://ls1tech.com/forums/showpost....0&postcount=97
need i go on? this is only the last 3 pages......
and for the record, my car went 13.11 @ 110.70 with a 2.2 60' on bald street tires and an LS1 intake with mods in sig.
https://ls1tech.com/forums/showpost....3&postcount=81
Here:
https://ls1tech.com/forums/showpost....0&postcount=84
Here is RPM WS6 proving you wrong:
https://ls1tech.com/forums/showpost....0&postcount=97
need i go on? this is only the last 3 pages......
and for the record, my car went 13.11 @ 110.70 with a 2.2 60' on bald street tires and an LS1 intake with mods in sig.
Anyway, Choco Taco said that all Mustangs depreciate at an extremely fast rate. I proved him wrong by bringing up the '03-'04 Cobra and '05+ Mustang GT. Do I even need to bring up old Mustangs?
The fact of the matter is, Choco Taco based his whole arguement around his perception that ALL Mustangs have a rapid depreciation rate. That is simply not true. The ex-rental V6 '05+ Mustangs are bringing $500 less than brand new window sticker at my local dealer.
Besides, when you own an F-body, (a car that depreciates every bit as fast as a Mustang), denouncing Mustangs based on how they depreciate is an incredibly stupid thing to do. It makes very little sense. It seems some of you guys are too dense to figure that out...
#136
Originally Posted by 560SL
Those "prove me wrong?" Get a ******* clue man. Who cares what your car did on street tires?
Anyway, Choco Taco said that all Mustangs depreciate at an extremely fast rate. I proved him wrong by bringing up the '03-'04 Cobra and '05+ Mustang GT. Do I even need to bring up old Mustangs?
The fact of the matter is, Choco Taco based his whole arguement around his perception that ALL Mustangs have a rapid depreciation rate. That is simply not true. The ex-rental V6 '05+ Mustangs are bringing $500 less than brand new window sticker at my local dealer.
Besides, when you own an F-body, (a car that depreciates every bit as fast as a Mustang), denouncing Mustangs based on how they depreciate is an incredibly stupid thing to do. It makes very little sense. It seems some of you guys are too dense to figure that out...
Anyway, Choco Taco said that all Mustangs depreciate at an extremely fast rate. I proved him wrong by bringing up the '03-'04 Cobra and '05+ Mustang GT. Do I even need to bring up old Mustangs?
The fact of the matter is, Choco Taco based his whole arguement around his perception that ALL Mustangs have a rapid depreciation rate. That is simply not true. The ex-rental V6 '05+ Mustangs are bringing $500 less than brand new window sticker at my local dealer.
Besides, when you own an F-body, (a car that depreciates every bit as fast as a Mustang), denouncing Mustangs based on how they depreciate is an incredibly stupid thing to do. It makes very little sense. It seems some of you guys are too dense to figure that out...
some people just never learn
#137
Originally Posted by 560SL
Those "prove me wrong?" Get a ******* clue man. Who cares what your car did on street tires?
Originally Posted by 560SL
Anyway, Choco Taco said that all Mustangs depreciate at an extremely fast rate. I proved him wrong by bringing up the '03-'04 Cobra and '05+ Mustang GT. Do I even need to bring up old Mustangs?
Originally Posted by 560SL
The fact of the matter is, Choco Taco based his whole arguement around his perception that ALL Mustangs have a rapid depreciation rate. That is simply not true. The ex-rental V6 '05+ Mustangs are bringing $500 less than brand new window sticker at my local dealer.
Originally Posted by 560SL
Besides, when you own an F-body, (a car that depreciates every bit as fast as a Mustang), denouncing Mustangs based on how they depreciate is an incredibly stupid thing to do. It makes very little sense. It seems some of you guys are too dense to figure that out...
http://autos.yahoo.com/kbb/report.ht...ubmit=Continue
numbers dont lie. this is the same year car with the same mileage, in the same condition. all i did was select a condition and a transmission and hit continue. i didnt add or remove any options than what KBB gives it by default. dispite what you say, this is the only accurate way to gauge the actual value of a car. not what some idiot is willing to pay for it. if i had the money i would find me a mint LS1 SS and i would gladly pay whatever i could afford for it if it ment i was getting the car of my dreams.
a honda civic is a good example here, obviously we both respect American Muscle, so you can relate. some douche bag buys a honda civic and pays very little for it, yet dumps thousands and thousands and thousands in it to make it half as fast as a stock f-body or mustang, but he still thinks his car is worth 20k when he wants to sell it, and someone out there is willing to pay that. but does that mean thats what it is worth? no.
#139
Originally Posted by 560SL
Those "prove me wrong?" Get a ******* clue man. Who cares what your car did on street tires?
Anyway, Choco Taco said that all Mustangs depreciate at an extremely fast rate. I proved him wrong by bringing up the '03-'04 Cobra and '05+ Mustang GT. Do I even need to bring up old Mustangs?
Anyway, Choco Taco said that all Mustangs depreciate at an extremely fast rate. I proved him wrong by bringing up the '03-'04 Cobra and '05+ Mustang GT. Do I even need to bring up old Mustangs?
Originally Posted by 560SL
The fact of the matter is, Choco Taco based his whole arguement around his perception that ALL Mustangs have a rapid depreciation rate. That is simply not true. The ex-rental V6 '05+ Mustangs are bringing $500 less than brand new window sticker at my local dealer.
Originally Posted by 560SL
Besides, when you own an F-body, (a car that depreciates every bit as fast as a Mustang), denouncing Mustangs based on how they depreciate is an incredibly stupid thing to do. It makes very little sense. It seems some of you guys are too dense to figure that out...
your whole post is basically a lie. start quoting my words instead of putting words in my mouth. there's a reason why you won't quote me - it's because i never said the things you are accusing me of saying. again, get a clue.
#140
Originally Posted by INMY01TA
Interesting. I put low milaege (30,000) 03 Cobra in that site and got this. Far cry from the $37,000 they sold for.
btw, that $37,000 price tag - don't forget to tack on dealer markup. we're talking more like $40,000 plus taxes and tags. before you know it, your $37,000 car is $43,000. congrats, your car is now worth half of what it was 4 years ago