Stupid guy Q...LT/LS ratings vs. real
#1
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: CA
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I know the LS's were the same 98-02 (aside from the LS6 intake), but they all dyno'd the same regardless of option of 4th gen. (Z, WS6, SS, etc.)
Was it the same for the LT1? If I recall correctly the LT1 SS/Firehawk, etc. was rated higher than a Z LT1. Did they have the exact same motors/exhaust/tune, etc? and put down similar numbers regardless of option like the LS1's?
I did a quick search, but couldnt' find anything. I'm just curious cause I've noticed a few SS LT1's in my area after a dry spell of not seeing any for several years, so it just popped the curiosity.
Was it the same for the LT1? If I recall correctly the LT1 SS/Firehawk, etc. was rated higher than a Z LT1. Did they have the exact same motors/exhaust/tune, etc? and put down similar numbers regardless of option like the LS1's?
I did a quick search, but couldnt' find anything. I'm just curious cause I've noticed a few SS LT1's in my area after a dry spell of not seeing any for several years, so it just popped the curiosity.
#2
TECH Apprentice
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Tempe, Az
Posts: 331
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
LT1 didn't even come close to dynoing near the LS1's. The typical LT1 M6 put down 250 at the wheels. Auto 240. LT1 SS would typically dyno 10rwhp higher because of the free flowing exhaust and intake mods.
#4
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Reading comprehension guys... the OP is asking if all of the LT1s put out similar numbers within each other, not compared to the LS1. For example... the saying here goes "an ls1 is an ls1 is an ls1...", does that same apply to LT1s?
#5
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: CA
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Thanks for hte responses guys, but, not really what I was asking.
So?....I guess simply I should have asked, is an LT1 and LT1, is an LT1? (like the LS1)?
#6
Launching!
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Chicago, Il
Posts: 293
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
alot of the ls1 ss/firehawks/ws6s dyno higher due to the ram air/slp lid and exhaust from the factory.
The LT1 SS in 96 is the only 4th gen where "all" of the ss's were faster "stock"
The LT1 SS in 96 is the only 4th gen where "all" of the ss's were faster "stock"
#7
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: CA
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
SOrry for so many Q's just trying to learn more.
Trending Topics
#10
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (127)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
however the lt4 equipped corvette was more powerful, i owned a lt1 corvette and the power was pretty much the same as a fbody,acceleration on the vette was better i imagine do to the lighter vehicle and the opti was actually easier to replace than fbody
#11
TECH Apprentice
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Tempe, Az
Posts: 331
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#12
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Tampa/Valrico, FL/ Chicago, IL
Posts: 555
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
umm a true LT4 is rated at like 425 i had an LT1 with only the LT4 hot cam and minor bolt ons and it put down 330 to the ground thru an M6 and my buddy did the full swap and made 397
#14
TECH Apprentice
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Tempe, Az
Posts: 331
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Here's a good site if you want to learn about the LT1/4
http://www.grandsportregistry.com/lt1vslt4.htm
#15
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: CA
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
So basically, all LT1 and all LS1 motors are the same regardless of 4th gen or vette they are in. The only exceptions would be SLP option, and LS6 goodies. (as far as power is concerned).
#16
11 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Kansas
Posts: 910
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
The motors are the same between the cars. 98-00 had a slightly larger camshaft compared to the 01-02, but the 01-02 came with the ls6 intake.
Where you gain HP with the firehawk/ss models are the options. Ram-air hoods that function as a slight ram air and a CAI, different cat-back options that are more free-flowing, etc. There is no doubt that a 96-97 SS with the ram air hood and a 2otl would flow more air/be faster than a z28 car. Completely depending on the options also (power windows/locks, ttop, anything that deals with weight). With the same options between the cars, the SS will be faster if they are both at optimum running condition.
The motors are the same, you just get a few extra hp from the intakes/catbacks.
Where you gain HP with the firehawk/ss models are the options. Ram-air hoods that function as a slight ram air and a CAI, different cat-back options that are more free-flowing, etc. There is no doubt that a 96-97 SS with the ram air hood and a 2otl would flow more air/be faster than a z28 car. Completely depending on the options also (power windows/locks, ttop, anything that deals with weight). With the same options between the cars, the SS will be faster if they are both at optimum running condition.
The motors are the same, you just get a few extra hp from the intakes/catbacks.
#19
11 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Kansas
Posts: 910
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Not sure if the LT4 was an OPTION in 97 SS cars, or if some of them got them by mistake or GM just trying to get rid of some extra LT4 setups. I've heard rumors of both ways, but have no idea which is true.
#20
TECH Fanatic
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Shillington PA
Posts: 1,775
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts