Generation III External Engine LS1 | LS6 | Bolt-Ons | Intakes | Exhaust | Ignition | Accessories
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

If I gut my cats.....

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-12-2011, 06:42 PM
  #1  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
PheonixLS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 397
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default If I gut my cats.....

I have been driving around for about 5 months on them ( only like 1000 miles) and I have not had a single code on my front o2's. My question is, if I gut my cats and lose that back pressure will I start throwing codes on my front o2's or will I have absolutely no problems at all. Thanks
Old 08-12-2011, 07:01 PM
  #2  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (11)
 
Zlow28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 2,081
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

You will get a code for the rear O2s. But the car will have no problem due to removing cats. The computer read the front o2 sensor, which should be changing constantly. Then it compares that reading to the rear o2 sensors, which should be more stable due to the cat. If the cat is removed, the rear sensors will read similar to front ones. Thats how the computer knows if the cat is working or not. The front o2s wouldnt be affected and you can always tune out the code later on.

However, i heard if you have a v6 camaro and gut the cat, you will smoke vipers and have no traction under 80mph jk your title reminded me of that story
Old 08-12-2011, 07:06 PM
  #3  
TECH Fanatic
 
KevinR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Euless Tx
Posts: 1,219
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Zlow28
You will get a code for the rear O2s. But the car will have no problem due to removing cats. The computer read the front o2 sensor, which should be changing constantly. Then it compares that reading to the rear o2 sensors, which should be more stable due to the cat. If the cat is removed, the rear sensors will read similar to front ones. Thats how the computer knows if the cat is working or not. The front o2s wouldnt be affected and you can always tune out the code later on.

However, i heard if you have a v6 camaro and gut the cat, you will smoke vipers and have no traction under 80mph jk your title reminded me of that story


The rear O2 sensor acts kinda like a "monitor" for a lack of a better term. Just get it tuned out.
Old 08-13-2011, 04:55 AM
  #4  
TECH Fanatic
 
RezinTexas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Katy, TX
Posts: 1,331
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

yep, it won't affect your front o2's at all.
Old 08-13-2011, 12:53 PM
  #5  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
PheonixLS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 397
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

So if I gut them how much louder will it make my exhaust
Old 08-13-2011, 12:59 PM
  #6  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (11)
 
Zlow28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 2,081
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

not much louder. You should be able to hear a small difference if you listen carefully, but your neighbors wont hear a difference at all from a distance. At least on a stock exhaust.
Old 08-13-2011, 01:59 PM
  #7  
Banned
iTrader: (2)
 
LS6427's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: South Florida
Posts: 11,291
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by PheonixLS1
I have been driving around for about 5 months on them ( only like 1000 miles) and I have not had a single code on my front o2's. My question is, if I gut my cats and lose that back pressure will I start throwing codes on my front o2's or will I have absolutely no problems at all. Thanks
I did after my 427CI went in, maybe 6 months later. Made a definite and clear change in the tone while at part throttle cruising.....I can't really say it got louder though. WOT it sounded great and pretty much the same. Had zero FEEL in any performance gain. I had my rear 02's tuned out when it got dyno tuned.

.
Old 08-13-2011, 02:30 PM
  #8  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
PheonixLS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 397
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Exhaust is anything but stock. LT, true duals, x pipe, lm1's, under axle and out the back. So that being known, will it make it noticably louder.
Old 08-13-2011, 02:41 PM
  #9  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (5)
 
Element's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: WV
Posts: 1,575
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Maybe a bit louder; definitely raspier, with those mufflers.

To clear something up from the initial post, a car neither "wants" nor needs backpressure. It's a bad thing.
Old 08-13-2011, 02:55 PM
  #10  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (2)
 
crainholio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,977
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Element
To clear something up from the initial post, a car neither "wants" nor needs backpressure. It's a bad thing.
What is the source of this information? Published engineering document, something you read on Teh Intarwebz, or personal intuition?
Old 08-13-2011, 03:36 PM
  #11  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (5)
 
Element's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: WV
Posts: 1,575
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by crainholio
What is the source of this information? Published engineering document, something you read on Teh Intarwebz, or personal intuition?
Basic physics, multiple threads to be found on this site, and the Advanced Tech forum.

Choking the exhaust doesn't increase performance at all (actually, it can be actively controlled via exhaust or jake brakes on larger trucks to provide increased engine braking to reduce wear on brake pads and rotors). Backpressure myths probably come mostly from backyard mechanics deciding they need the largest exhaust diameter possible (from the head flange to the tailpipe) who don't understand scavenging and gas velocity flow basics.

I'd also note that something that's commonly done - increasing the exhaust pipe diameter further back from the engine - is actually counter-intuitively a bad thing. By increasing the pipe diameter, you slow the exhaust gas velocity, which in turn creates a greater restriction further back, as the faster-moving exhaust gases in the smaller pipe collide with the now slowing-down exhaust gases in the larger pipe. By decreasing the exhaust pipe size further from the engine - where the exhaust gases are naturally slowing down some due to wall turbulence, gas compression, and that sort of thing - those exhaust gases can actually be forced to pick up velocity without offering a negative increase in backpressure closer to the engine, resulting in a better-performing exhaust.

Now, that ignores a lot of the more advanced tech stuff, which belongs in the Advanced Tech forum to be described by people more intelligent about this subject than I am.

But, as far as longer and better worded arguments against backpressure go, here are a few links to check out:

http://www.thumpertalk.com/forum/sho....php?p=6554557
http://www.thrashercharged.com/tech_htm/exhaust.shtm
http://www.aa1car.com/library/exhaust_backpressure.htm
http://my.prostreetonline.com/forums...php?t-1639.htm
Old 08-13-2011, 05:24 PM
  #12  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (2)
 
crainholio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,977
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Element
Basic physics, multiple threads to be found on this site, and the Advanced Tech forum.

Bunch of stuff he read on Teh Intarwebz omitted...
Figured.

There have been threads on this site that say engine oil gets thicker as it gets hotter, by way of explaining the notion of 5W-30 multi-viscosity specs.

I'll stick with published engineering info when making my decisions about exhaust system design, and focus on the right amount of backpressure instead of aiming for zero.
Old 08-13-2011, 05:36 PM
  #13  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (5)
 
Element's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: WV
Posts: 1,575
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by crainholio
Figured.

There have been threads on this site that say engine oil gets thicker as it gets hotter, by way of explaining the notion of 5W-30 multi-viscosity specs.

I'll stick with published engineering info when making my decisions about exhaust system design, and focus on the right amount of backpressure instead of aiming for zero.
Well, if you want to believe backpressure is a good thing, you go right on ahead. Your engine, your loss of power, not mine. If you can come up with even a remotely reasonable explanation of how backpressure helps make power, you'd be the first one to ever do so.

Funny that it seems you didn't even bother reading any of the links and probably don't understand exhaust velocity in the first place...but...whatever. That's what the interwebs is for.
Old 08-13-2011, 07:18 PM
  #14  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (2)
 
crainholio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,977
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Element
Well, if you want to believe backpressure is a good thing, you go right on ahead. Your engine, your loss of power, not mine. If you can come up with even a remotely reasonable explanation of how backpressure helps make power, you'd be the first one to ever do so.
If I understand what you're saying, your point is that an engine exhaust system needs velocity but not backpressure. Accurate point and I can see your logic.

However...we're talking about the entire engine, not just the exhaust system and this is where I think you've gone off track with your statement that "cars don't need backpressure." We likely agree more than you think, but that statement is misleading. Read on if you like.


Originally Posted by Element
Funny that it seems you didn't even bother reading any of the links and probably don't understand exhaust velocity in the first place...but...whatever. That's what the interwebs is for.
I don't have to eat a turd to know it tastes bad, either. I just checked the articles for any evidence of engineering credentials on the part of the authors.

You would really enjoy taking a crack at reading "Scientific Design of Exhaust and Intake Systems" which will move your focus from the exhaust pipe to the combustion chamber and cylinder where the magic really happens. Learn about cylinder filling, harmonics, and the effect of the fuel/air charge being partially blown out the still-open exhaust valve in an improperly-designed zero-backpressure system, and you'll have a ball.
Old 08-14-2011, 07:22 AM
  #15  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
PheonixLS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 397
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Ok,,can we get back to the actual questions of my thread please. Thanks
Old 08-14-2011, 08:05 AM
  #16  
TECH Fanatic
 
RezinTexas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Katy, TX
Posts: 1,331
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

I've never done it to an LS1, but I gutted the cats on my old 540i (4.4 V8) and the sound was somewhat rhaspy. It sounded just ok, not great.
Old 08-14-2011, 08:08 AM
  #17  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
PheonixLS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 397
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I guess after the feedback my question is will it get NOTICABLY louder. I want louder, like alot louder......



Quick Reply: If I gut my cats.....



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:12 PM.