Aren't MAF Ends Just As Good As . . . .
It looks like the opening (with MAF ends) is about the same so it should flow as much air. And if you tune in your MAF table then you're technically "calibrated".
Am I making sense or am I all wet? Is there any advantage to the "LS6" style units over MAF ends and LS1 Edit??
Mark
Mark
However, most people use a linear correction factor in Edit, whereas if you were to try Chris B's non-linear model that might eliminate the issue.
I'm contemplating weather to put the Ends on or just stay with the Stock MAF.
<small>[ May 24, 2002, 11:37 AM: Message edited by: HOSS99 ]</small>
Trending Topics
Setup 1: Pace descreened Calibrated LS6 Maf
Setup 2: ThunderRacing ported ends with a tweaked LS1Edit Maf table (I didn't do this table linear, I adjusted according to Ltrim readings at a particular maf frequency)
2 dyno runs with setup one (back to back). Then switched to setup 2. Results were within 2HP of each other 374 - 376.
Ragtop, does Chris have a "you plug in the value" Excel file for maf values? I did mine real "hackish"!
Mark
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
Chris has instructions for how to do a curve fit and it requires decent excel skills (e.g. pivot table). It isn't plug and play.
your results are exactly what is expected for a stock cube motor w/o big mods. Stock MAF flows well.



