scottHMT

iTrader: (5)

Mods are
Pacesetter longtubes
2.5inch X pipe with bullets
LS6 mani
ported oil pump/ ls2 chain
Lid/k&n filter
TSP stage 2.5 heads
Torquer v2 with 112 LSA
LS7 lifters
stock graphite headgasket
Professional products TB with downsize funnel
tb bypass coolant mod
160deg thermostat
M6 ram hd clutch stock flywheel
stock underdrive pulley
stock 10 bolt




What do you guys think?

scottHMT

iTrader: (5)

Also, my stock 28lb injectors ran out of fuel at about 6200 rpm

scottHMT

iTrader: (5)

anyone??? is it low? or is it normal? Bottom end has 50k on it.

Daredevil_TA

iTrader: (6)

i'd say thats pretty good, saw a guy with a similar setup thru a t56 that only put down around 395 to the wheels.

beezer1519

iTrader: (19)

really wonder what the cam spec was... mine put down 370rwhp and i don't have heads or intake yet...

scottHMT

iTrader: (5)

my cam specs are 232/234 .595/.598, 112LSA. Sounds really mean, the sounds through the x pipe is very pleasing to the ears

KroMiniX

iTrader: (4)

streetable?

1sicws6

yeah sounds good with those magnaflow bullets throw a fast on there and see a nice gain!

beezer1519

iTrader: (19)

yep i had a x pipe custom made out of my ory lol running spintech's dumped before the axle gotta love those 112 lsa lops... my cam specs are 221/224 on a 112 lsa .559/.581...

scottHMT

iTrader: (5)

I'd say its streetable, I could drive it in stop and go traffic, wouldn't be fun, but far from impossible.

RyderTA

iTrader: (3)

Not to bad at all, we have ALMOST identical setups, I think you have a freer flowing exhaust and I have a 9" rear. I put down 414/380 last week, but with the spray(100 shot) it was 515/647!

SSpdDmon

iTrader: (10)

Looks good - maybe a small timing issue from 4,000 to ~4,600 - either knock sensors detected too much timing or it's not enough. Other than that, I'd be happy. Did the tuner say where he left the timing?

teke184

iTrader: (5)

i was thinking its a bit on the low side.

that cam and those heads through a m6 should make more. not saying you're WAY low...but i would say 10hp and some torque.

the torque has me curious. my torquer v1 cam only put down 382rwhp with some small issues (tb not open all the way due to cable adj issue, and i was on a single 3" exhaust).
what has me curious is that even with -40hp...i still have only -10 lbft of torque.

wht01ws6ta

iTrader: (45)

What kind of CNC heads, 243 or 5.3? I have the same cam as you on the same LSA too but different heads, different intake, different flywheel, and a EWP so it's not really a good comparison. I would get larger injectors for sure though!

WeathermanShawn

iTrader: (1)

How do you like that cam?

Ran a 232/234 112 for about 6 months. Gave me similar higher RPM HP numbers, but I started leaning toward the overall higher torque curve numbers (personal preference) of a 'smaller' cam.

I also could never get my TQ numbers over 375 ft/lbs with the 232/234 112 cam. In reality, for racing most shifts are in the 4400rpm+ power band, so it may not really matter for a lot of people.

TQ is fun in a 346 for the street. I think your numbers are quite nice, just a little lower in the overall torque curve than my own personal preference.

The bottom line is if it performs the way you want, I would be happy.

Enjoy.

..WeathermanShawn..

TORCHD 02 TA

iTrader: (39)

hmmm i cannot wait to get heads. CAM only i made 404/375.. SAE i made 415/378.....
all on my 228/232 baby cam

firefighter813x

iTrader: (6)

I hope that's a joke because 228/232 is not a baby cam.

JJD49

Decent numbers, but they seem kind of low for a motor with heads plus you used a Dyno Jet which always read high.

TORCHD 02 TA

iTrader: (39)

i think it is a baby cam... i say 236+ is a large cam

scottHMT

iTrader: (5)

yeah it was lookin a bit on the low side aswell. I think maybe my pacesetter headers are choking it, or the weight of my stock flywheel/stock pulley isnt letting it make as much peak hp. But its good, itw within 10-15hp of what it should make, so the variables are many.