Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Pushrod length sanity check

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 26, 2010 | 05:54 PM
  #1  
Rhino's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 369
Likes: 0
From: Olathe, KS
Default Pushrod length sanity check

Ever since I put my LQ4 back together (ported 853 heads, LS7 lifters, 210*/218* .551 lift on 116 LSA, and Comp 7.300 pushrods) I've had an unholy sewing machine noise. The engine runs strong, but is pretty noisy.
It seems to be the loudest on the passenger side of the engine.

This is far from a radical combo and feel it should sound near stock.
When using an adjustable pushrod, my measured (via caliper) pushrod length at zero lash was 7.230. An extra .050 for lifter preload would put me at 7.280. I ordered 7.300 and threw it all together. On startup it sounded pretty nasty, but started quieting down as the lifters pumped up. I have a steady and consistent knock that I feel is still coming from the valve train.

Once I started researching the issue, I've found people mentioning gauge length vs total length of a pushrod. Is the difference in gauge vs total length something that could have lead me to order the wrong pushrods?

Given the above info, what pushrod length would you suggest?
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2010 | 06:32 PM
  #2  
Darkman's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,167
Likes: 6
From: Spring, Texas
Default

The difference between gauge length and actual length is about 0.0170 inch. So if you ordered Comp Cam 7.300 its actual length would have been 7.283. So your actual preload is about 0.053 inch.
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2010 | 07:04 PM
  #3  
vettenuts's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 8,092
Likes: 13
From: Little Rhody
Default

Originally Posted by Darkman
The difference between gauge length and actual length is about 0.0170 inch. So if you ordered Comp Cam 7.300 its actual length would have been 7.283. So your actual preload is about 0.053 inch.
A 7.300" gauge length would actually be 7.317" overall length with gauge length taken on the ball where it is 0.140" in diameter (more or less the contact patch with the pushrod cup) and overall length is the distance between the ends of the oil holes.

The difference between these two definitions doesn't change the actual length, they are measurements of the same pushrod taken at two different locations. If your valve train is noisy, I would ask how you measured the first time to determine if you measured correctly.
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2010 | 07:41 PM
  #4  
Darkman's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,167
Likes: 6
From: Spring, Texas
Default

Originally Posted by vettenuts
A 7.300" gauge length would actually be 7.317" overall length with gauge length taken on the ball where it is 0.140" in diameter (more or less the contact patch with the pushrod cup) and overall length is the distance between the ends of the oil holes.

The difference between these two definitions doesn't change the actual length, they are measurements of the same pushrod taken at two different locations. If your valve train is noisy, I would ask how you measured the first time to determine if you measured correctly.
Agree - I was afraid I would get it backwards (again) when I posted.

(In my case I measured using Comp Cams adjustable pushrod and determined a specific length to order. The problem was I ordered from Manton who is a "overall" length supplier. I came up short. Stated another way my Comp Cam adjustable pushrod, which is label 6.80 has an overall length of 6.817.)
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2010 | 10:34 PM
  #5  
Rhino's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 369
Likes: 0
From: Olathe, KS
Default

Originally Posted by vettenuts
If your valve train is noisy, I would ask how you measured the first time to determine if you measured correctly.
I would absolutely concur that I must have measured something incorrectly. IMO, the valve train sounds too loose. What's odd about it is that I had around 1 1/2 turns before I hit 22 lb/ft when doing the final torque on the rockers. I know each case is unique, but that seems to be similar to those who do end up with the proper length.

I will be opening it back up to re-measure tomorrow. I just wanted to make sure I was correct in my math before going through the trouble again. It sounds as if the gauge length should have come out in my favor in this scenario, adding to my preload.
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2010 | 06:47 AM
  #6  
69LT1Bird's Avatar
11 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,310
Likes: 6
From: Lapeer, MI
Default

If your heads are not milled and you have stock head gaskets 7.300 seems very wrong.

.100 difference from stock is a lot.
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2010 | 07:05 AM
  #7  
vettenuts's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 8,092
Likes: 13
From: Little Rhody
Default

Originally Posted by Rhino
I would absolutely concur that I must have measured something incorrectly. IMO, the valve train sounds too loose. What's odd about it is that I had around 1 1/2 turns before I hit 22 lb/ft when doing the final torque on the rockers. I know each case is unique, but that seems to be similar to those who do end up with the proper length.

I will be opening it back up to re-measure tomorrow. I just wanted to make sure I was correct in my math before going through the trouble again. It sounds as if the gauge length should have come out in my favor in this scenario, adding to my preload.
If you are getting 1-1/2 turns that does sound odd. How are you determining zero lash? I never get it right using the old method of twisting the pushrod between my fingers. I gently lift the rocker tip until I get rid of any clearance or "tick" "tick" when I lift it. You have to be very gentle doing this though. Also, are you sure the lifter is on the base circle of the cam and all the way down. I have also found that if the pushrod is out and you move the motor the lifter will stay up in the lifter tray and you need to push it back down against the cam before measuring.
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2010 | 08:26 AM
  #8  
1SLwLS1's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,360
Likes: 0
Default

I agree, 7.300" for that mild cam, something seems off. Use the EO/IC method for determining that your lifters are on the base circle and zero lash can be very hard to achieve. You can tighten the rocker bolt with your finger well past zero lash before feeling any resistance.
Reply
LS1 Tech Stories

The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time

story-0

6 Gifts Neither Your Dad Nor Grad Will Shove Into the 'Trinket Drawer'

 Brett Foote
story-1

Topdon ONE vs. Artidiag 800 BT2: Which is the Diagnostic Tablet For You?

 Pouria Savadkouei
story-2

Gas Monkey Built a 6-Wheel Ferrari Testarossa With a Corvette LT4 Engine

 Verdad Gallardo
story-3

7 Most Reliable High-Performance Engines GM Has Ever Built

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

Amazing '71 Camaro Restomod Is Modern Muscle Car Under the Skin

 Verdad Gallardo
story-5

6 Common C5 Corvette Failures and What's Involved In Repairing Them

 Pouria Savadkouei
story-6

Retro Modern Bandit Pontiac Trans AM Comes With Burt Reynolds' Autograph

 Verdad Gallardo
story-7

Top 10 Greatest Cadillac V Series Performance Models Ever, Ranked

 Pouria Savadkouei
story-8

Top 10 Most Powerful Chevy Trucks Ever Made!

 
story-9

Hennessey's New Supercharged Silverado ZR2 Has 700 HP

 Verdad Gallardo
Old Aug 27, 2010 | 09:17 AM
  #9  
Damian's Avatar
LSX Mechanic
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (89)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 10,396
Likes: 14
From: Atlanta
Default

Unless somebody took a hack saw and cut half the deck off your heads, 7.3 sounds WAAAAAY too short. I don't think I've ever used a pushrod that short on an LSX engine.
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2010 | 09:24 AM
  #10  
Squirts11's Avatar
TECH Resident
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 897
Likes: 4
From: OKC, OK
Default

Originally Posted by vettenuts
If you are getting 1-1/2 turns that does sound odd. How are you determining zero lash? I never get it right using the old method of twisting the pushrod between my fingers. I gently lift the rocker tip until I get rid of any clearance or "tick" "tick" when I lift it. You have to be very gentle doing this though. Also, are you sure the lifter is on the base circle of the cam and all the way down. I have also found that if the pushrod is out and you move the motor the lifter will stay up in the lifter tray and you need to push it back down against the cam before measuring.
I was thinking the same thing.

For cyl #1, the lifters are on the cam's base circle when both cam/crank dots are at 12 o'clock.

The EO/IC method is also accurate practice for finding the cam's base circle.

Last edited by Squirts11; Aug 27, 2010 at 09:30 AM.
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2010 | 10:08 AM
  #11  
janaka's Avatar
11 Second Club
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 216
Likes: 0
From: South Shore, NS
Default

IIRC the LS7 lifters do have the cups for the PR's up higher than the standard LS1 lifters, however I've heard it to be only .05" or so

I'm installing milled heads (TSP 5.3's down to 59cc) and the LS7 lifters and I'm anticipating needing 7.3" for my PR's once I throw it together.
Reply
Old Aug 29, 2010 | 06:11 PM
  #12  
Rhino's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 369
Likes: 0
From: Olathe, KS
Default

I finally had a chance to open it back up and take a few more measurements. I think I had originally gotten my EO/IC switched and used EC/IO. That's what you get when rushing at the end of a long day.

I ended up with much different numbers this time. I broke out the adjustable pushrod set at 7.367 (total length) and ended up with 1 5/8 turns exhaust, just a hare shy of 2 turns intake. I'd feel comfortable calling it 1 7/8.
Measuring with my 7.3's and stock 7.4's I'm noticing a pretty consistent trend that the intake looks like it may need .025 shorter than the exhaust. Should I simply run 7.350's all the way around and run with the additional preload on the intake? Or should I get 7.350's for the exhaust and 7.0325's for the intake?

I did mention these were ported 853's, but neglected to mention they do also have aftermarket valves as well. They're Lloyd Elliot Stage 2 heads. Is it common to have to staggered push rod lengths to make up for valve differences? I'm guessing the intake valve stem is longer, or the valve is recessed in the head a little. The cam is .551 lift on both intake and exhaust. I'm not certain where else the difference could be coming from.

Last edited by Rhino; Aug 29, 2010 at 06:29 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 29, 2010 | 06:30 PM
  #13  
vettenuts's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 8,092
Likes: 13
From: Little Rhody
Default

Could be valve length or the way it is set in the head. A lot of guys run two different lengths. You could also order from Manton since you have good measurements. You may also be able to increase the OD to 11/32".
Reply
Old Aug 29, 2010 | 09:30 PM
  #14  
Rhino's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 369
Likes: 0
From: Olathe, KS
Default

Thanks for the help, I really do appreciate it. I'm still not 100% sure how I botched the measurements up so bad the first time. This motor is in my DD Avalanche. I'll probably stick with the standard Comp's. They'll be plenty strong for this build. I'm using moderate spring pressure on a smallish cam. I can count on my hand the number of times it's been over 5k.

With 7.350 all the way around I'll have .076 preload on the exhaust, .088 on the intake. With 7.320 on the intake side, I'd be looking at .061 preload. At this point I'd like to err on the high side of preload if possible.

On a related note, I realize .050 is commonly referenced as the minimum preload, but what would optimal and maximum operational preload be with LS7 lifters? I keep seeing a max preload numbers between .100 to .150 thrown about, but haven't found anything that's a little more definite. A thread on hardcorels1 made reference to almost .200 before bottoming out and referenced info gleaned from Predator-Z stating that stock preload was in the .080 to .100 area. I take all that info with a grain of salt, but want to find as much info as I can to make an informed decision.

EDIT: After reading quite a few more threads, I'm going to run with the 7.350 all the way around. I've found info from multiple sources (vendors) stating the LS7 lifter can be noisy at or below .060 preload.

Last edited by Rhino; Aug 29, 2010 at 09:44 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2010 | 03:20 AM
  #15  
Exidous's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,747
Likes: 4
From: Under a rock
Default

The .080-.100" is what the LS1 lifters use and good lord were mine noisy at .050" and .060" preload. Have them at .075" and .085" preload int and exh respectively and it is much quieter.
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2010 | 11:50 AM
  #16  
Rhino's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 369
Likes: 0
From: Olathe, KS
Default

Well... I got the 7.350 pushrods in and I can say it's better, but not by much. I'm almost certain that this is valve train noise, but apparently I'm lacking in some fundamental area.
Again, it's the passenger side that is much louder than the drivers. I've swapped the rockers between bank 1 and 2 to insure it wasn't anything there. Anyone have any other insight as to what's going on here? The intake's ended up being a little tighter than I had expected, and are just at 2 turns preload.

w/ 7.300 push rods
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vI0emQAcegk
w/ 7.350 push rods
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ziH1Y1KUUkw

Last edited by Rhino; Sep 4, 2010 at 11:57 AM.
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2010 | 04:05 PM
  #17  
Racinjason424's Avatar
Launching!
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 242
Likes: 0
From: HOLT, MI
Default

Did the header gaskets look ok? I've heard a couple leaky header gaskets that were thought to be lifters ticking?? Especially with the noise being more noticable on one side..
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2010 | 04:36 PM
  #18  
IWGF's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,268
Likes: 0
From: Aztec, NM
Default

Originally Posted by Racinjason424
Did the header gaskets look ok? I've heard a couple leaky header gaskets that were thought to be lifters ticking?? Especially with the noise being more noticable on one side..
That is definitely not an exhaust leak.
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2010 | 09:56 PM
  #19  
Rhino's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 369
Likes: 0
From: Olathe, KS
Default

It's absolutely not an exhaust leak. It's very mechanical in nature. Given the frequency in comparison with engine RPM, I'm almost certain it's in the valve train.
I have also tried two different sets of header gaskets. I had a set of paper gaskets when the engine was first installed; I've since moved to a set of good stainless steel gaskets with the same noise.
Reply
Old Sep 5, 2010 | 08:36 AM
  #20  
vettenuts's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 8,092
Likes: 13
From: Little Rhody
Default

What cam lobe is it (XER)?

There was a post within the past few days where someone couldn't correct their noise (it was a shop) and finally went to a different cam with a different lobe, problem went away. You may want to contact them. Here is a link: Link
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:05 PM.

story-0
6 Gifts Neither Your Dad Nor Grad Will Shove Into the 'Trinket Drawer'

Don't get dad new socks or a grill brush this year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-04 18:13:20


VIEW MORE
story-1
Topdon ONE vs. Artidiag 800 BT2: Which is the Diagnostic Tablet For You?

Slideshow: We take a close look at the ONE and Artidiag 800BT2 diagnostic tools from Topdon and the reasons to buy one over the other.

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-05-28 11:05:11


VIEW MORE
story-2
Gas Monkey Built a 6-Wheel Ferrari Testarossa With a Corvette LT4 Engine

Slideshow: The controversial Ferrari F6 swaps its original flat-12 for a Corvette Z06-derived LT4 V8 and sends power to four rear wheels through a custom-built drivetrain.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-26 18:23:54


VIEW MORE
story-3
7 Most Reliable High-Performance Engines GM Has Ever Built

Slideshow:These GM engines didn't just make huge power, they survived abuse, boost, track days, and six-digit mileage with a reputation for refusing to quit.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-21 16:45:27


VIEW MORE
story-4
Amazing '71 Camaro Restomod Is Modern Muscle Car Under the Skin

Slideshow: This heavily modified 1971 Camaro mixes classic muscle car styling with a fifth-generation Camaro interior and modern LS3 power.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:06:42


VIEW MORE
story-5
6 Common C5 Corvette Failures and What's Involved In Repairing Them

Slideshow: From wobbling harmonic balancers to failed EBCMs, these are the issues that define long-term C5 ownership and what repairs typically involve.

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-05-07 18:44:57


VIEW MORE
story-6
Retro Modern Bandit Pontiac Trans AM Comes With Burt Reynolds' Autograph

Slideshow: A modern Camaro transformed into a retro icon, this limited-run "Bandit" build blends nostalgia with brute force in a way few revivals manage.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-21 13:57:02


VIEW MORE
story-7
Top 10 Greatest Cadillac V Series Performance Models Ever, Ranked

Slideshow: Cadillac didn't just crash the high-performance luxury vehicle party, it showed up loud, supercharged, and occasionally a little unhinged...

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-04-16 10:05:15


VIEW MORE
story-8
Top 10 Most Powerful Chevy Trucks Ever Made!

Slideshow: Top ten most powerful Chevy trucks ever made

By | 2026-03-25 09:22:26


VIEW MORE
story-9
Hennessey's New Supercharged Silverado ZR2 Has 700 HP

Slideshow: Hennessey has turned the Silverado ZR2 into a 700-hp off-road monster with supercharged V8 power and a limited production run.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-03-24 18:57:52


VIEW MORE