Thoughts on a h/c/i setup
#1
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Granite City, IL
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thoughts on a h/c/i setup
I was thinking of doing a tsp torquer v3 cam with the ls6 2.5 heads and an ls6 intake. Has anyone tried this combo or anything similar?
#4
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (8)
Then it should be pretty good. I actually prefer the v2 because the less aggressive intake lobe is more valvetrain friendly. That .643 intake lobe is a little big unless all you wanna do is track the car and if that is your goal just go bigger cam with more gear/stall.... Just my opinion of course but I bet there is maybe 5rwhp between the two..
My old 346 had a 230/234 .612/598 in it and after 36K everything still looked good in it. Dyno showed no valve float so I ASSUME the PRC Golds were still good.... I would stick around that range for a DD car..
Edit: I would expect 410-425 with that setup.. I made 417rwhp with cam listed above and PRC 5.3's and a FAST 90/90....
My old 346 had a 230/234 .612/598 in it and after 36K everything still looked good in it. Dyno showed no valve float so I ASSUME the PRC Golds were still good.... I would stick around that range for a DD car..
Edit: I would expect 410-425 with that setup.. I made 417rwhp with cam listed above and PRC 5.3's and a FAST 90/90....
#5
Teching In
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Ft.Lauderdale, FL
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Then it should be pretty good. I actually prefer the v2 because the less aggressive intake lobe is more valvetrain friendly. That .643 intake lobe is a little big unless all you wanna do is track the car and if that is your goal just go bigger cam with more gear/stall.... Just my opinion of course but I bet there is maybe 5rwhp between the two..
My old 346 had a 230/234 .612/598 in it and after 36K everything still looked good in it. Dyno showed no valve float so I ASSUME the PRC Golds were still good.... I would stick around that range for a DD car..
Edit: I would expect 410-425 with that setup.. I made 417rwhp with cam listed above and PRC 5.3's and a FAST 90/90....
My old 346 had a 230/234 .612/598 in it and after 36K everything still looked good in it. Dyno showed no valve float so I ASSUME the PRC Golds were still good.... I would stick around that range for a DD car..
Edit: I would expect 410-425 with that setup.. I made 417rwhp with cam listed above and PRC 5.3's and a FAST 90/90....
#6
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Granite City, IL
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
the car will not be used as a dd but i would still like to keep it as reliable as possible so thanks for the help. As far as the heads go, would the 2.5 ls6 heads be a better choice over the 2.5 5.3s? Sorry i know nothing about cars when it comes to the technical stuff
Trending Topics
#8
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 590
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I would also go for the ls6 heads over the 5.3's The best head for the money would be the AFR 210cc head. Gas milage might even increase with that head since the runner is about 15cc smaller than ported stock runners.
#9
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (8)
Yeah those AFR's are a great head and if $$$ allows you cannot go wrong there... I ended up with another aftermarket casting but if those AFR's were available at the time there is a good possibility they would be on top of my motor now even though I ended up with some killer heads..
IMO you will be happier with a quality aftermarket casting in the long run. Remember this is coming from a guy who had a set of ported OEM's from a popular sponsor. Now I wish I had only spent the $$$ once....
If you decide on an OEM head though do the 243/799's...
IMO you will be happier with a quality aftermarket casting in the long run. Remember this is coming from a guy who had a set of ported OEM's from a popular sponsor. Now I wish I had only spent the $$$ once....
If you decide on an OEM head though do the 243/799's...