Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Fast 90/92 or 102

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-06-2011, 12:54 AM
  #1  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
chevy9s9s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Ventura, CA
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default Fast 90/92 or 102

I've been doing a lot of research on different intakes and came to a crossroads with these 3. My buddy is wanting to trade me his fast 90 for my camaros m6 for a manual swap so nothing would come out of pocket. but if there is more gain through a 92 or 102 that would be prefered, im willing to buy a new for more hp. im up for any suggestions of other intakes too.

will too big of an intake cause any cutbacks, or you think my potential can be maxed?

Basically my setup is this: Blackwing air- intake with cold air shroud :: stock T/B :: stock ls6 intake :: A&A heads & cam :: LG Pro 2 3/4in headers w/cats :: true dual center mounted :: McCord dual electric cutouts :: Z06 Ti mufflers.
Old 04-06-2011, 06:36 AM
  #2  
TECH Senior Member
 
garygnu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 5,446
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

you would a couple more hp with the fast 102,but you are getting a great deal I would get the fast 90.you will need a matching TB.what about emissions?
Old 04-06-2011, 06:51 AM
  #3  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (8)
 
Always2Slow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 639
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Fast 102 if buying new. If buying or trading the other fast manifolds are still good, but I wouldn't trade a manual swap for it. Its a 500 manifold used at most.
Old 04-06-2011, 09:54 AM
  #4  
Launching!
iTrader: (3)
 
MPM IV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 277
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I've had a ported 90 and ported 102 on the same motor. There's realy no difference performance wise. Go with whichever is cheaper.
Old 04-06-2011, 11:01 AM
  #5  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
chevy9s9s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Ventura, CA
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by garygnu
you would a couple more hp with the fast 102,but you are getting a great deal I would get the fast 90.you will need a matching TB.what about emissions?
Actually, the car passes emissions as it is now with flying colors. just passed smog here in CA about a week or 2 ago.

My buddy would be polishin up his TB and that would be thrown in with the the deal. TB & fast90 for the m6.
Old 04-06-2011, 11:17 AM
  #6  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
chevy9s9s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Ventura, CA
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Always2Slow
Fast 102 if buying new. If buying or trading the other fast manifolds are still good, but I wouldn't trade a manual swap for it. Its a 500 manifold used at most.
thing is the m6 is coming from my camaro roller (big waste of space at the moment).

figuring from quotes of hansonsuperspeed(i could have the name all wrong. cant find the thread lol) the 102(850) w/ fuelrailkit & Xover line (250) and assuming it doesnt come with a TB (350 guesstimation)

havent researched it, but how does a general m6 tranny go for? (80k miles on it minus the new slave, not sure on any of the other parts)
Old 04-06-2011, 11:25 AM
  #7  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
chevy9s9s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Ventura, CA
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by MPM IV
I've had a ported 90 and ported 102 on the same motor. There's realy no difference performance wise. Go with whichever is cheaper.
with the setup as it is i wouldnt mind spendin the little extra on the 102 if it does show some considerable gain vs the stock ls6 i got on it. and plus the 102/102 would both be new, and with the exhaust basically having a hallway to run out of i believe it would maximize flow, unless im missing something.
Old 04-06-2011, 12:54 PM
  #8  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (8)
 
Always2Slow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 639
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Its not so much the gain and to be honest the 102 will see the biggest benefit either on a stroker or a very radical 346. The idea behind getting the 102 is its a better design and is a better candidate for porting. They designed the 102 to be more porter friendly. I am not saying the other intakes can't be ported or are very hard to port, its just that 102 just addresses the issue better. So instead of having to get the 102 the second time around, you can get it now. so when you want to up the cubes you will have one of the best intakes.
Old 04-06-2011, 01:39 PM
  #9  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (12)
 
brians91formula's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: NH
Posts: 806
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

For your setup get the cheapest FAST intake you can find. They are all very close power wise.

102/102 combo is a waste of money considering you need to buy fuel rails with it and it requires some modification to make it fit right.
Old 04-06-2011, 02:42 PM
  #10  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (7)
 
BrntWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Land of the FOID
Posts: 2,004
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts

Default

Fast 102 will give you about 5rwhp over the 92 on a typical H/C setup.
Old 04-06-2011, 06:25 PM
  #11  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (39)
 
LilJayV10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Evansville,IN
Posts: 9,478
Received 910 Likes on 650 Posts

Default

The FAST 102 is going to cost more than the 90/92 and their are fitment problems. IMO, the right way to do it is to get a LS2 water pump. Here is a really good thread about the 102.

https://ls1tech.com/forums/generatio...-new-post.html

I had a 102 and sold it and went with a 92. I didn't know all the little problems and extra stuff you have to get for it. For me it wasn't worth the extra money or the headaches to run the 102. There is a reason everyone is looking for a 90/92 now. They are getting harder and harder to find.
Old 04-06-2011, 07:04 PM
  #12  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (24)
 
chrs1313's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,697
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

let her eat... 102 Fast...

kind of a max effort setup though...i can see why some would not want to go this route because of the modifications...i already have an EWP and used ls2 rails...dropped right in...

https://ls1tech.com/forums/dynamomet...-a4-346-a.html
Old 04-07-2011, 03:19 AM
  #13  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
chevy9s9s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Ventura, CA
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

decisions decisions... thanks for all the advice! as enticing as the 102 is to get i think i may settle for the best buy. fast 90 tb&intake less of a headache and money. may go sts soon but thats another story. again, thanks for all the advice!
Old 04-07-2011, 07:56 AM
  #14  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (7)
 
janaka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: South Shore, NS
Posts: 216
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'm *only* running teh FAST90 and it was a huge improvement over the LS6 intake for my then cam only car.
If the price is right do it.
Old 04-07-2011, 08:07 AM
  #15  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (15)
 
trans_am7935's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Glen Burnie, MD
Posts: 1,453
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

i was considering the FAST 102, but got a killer deal on a nice FAST 92/92 combo with 42lb hr injectors....cant beat intake/TB/Injector combo for $650!!! and then i ended up selling the injectors for $250, and my old LS6 intake with throttle body for $450. i basically made money by buying the FAST intake! i still have my original injectors too! so i would just go the best budget way, in the hands of a good porter (or even self port), the fast 90/92 is a beast. for 3-5 rwhp gain in stock form and maybe less then that in a ported 92 vs ported 102, then i would definitely go for the 90/92 combo.

just my .02

good luck on your decision, at the end of the day, it is your combo not anybody else's.
Old 04-07-2011, 04:03 PM
  #16  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
mike c.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: mi
Posts: 4,033
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

the 102mm is a better overall intake. but,if you can get a great deal on a 90/92mm take it.
Old 04-07-2011, 04:26 PM
  #17  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (55)
 
Mike Morris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Md/PA/FL
Posts: 1,624
Received 68 Likes on 57 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by mike c.
the 102mm is a better overall intake. but,if you can get a great deal on a 90/92mm take it.


I agree.
Old 04-07-2011, 06:46 PM
  #18  
Captain Double Post
iTrader: (2)
 
BOBS99SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Elyria Ohio
Posts: 1,617
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

I would not trade a 6 speed swap for a 500 dollar intake,but its your call,
Old 04-08-2011, 04:43 PM
  #19  
On The Tree
iTrader: (2)
 
theevette's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Your trans is worth a grand
Old 04-09-2011, 05:49 AM
  #20  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
chevy9s9s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Ventura, CA
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

worst thing about this whole debate is it does just come down to budget.

of course i wouldnt just do an intake for m6. at minimum the deal is: m6 (1k) = 90/90 intake & T/B (500 150) + $450ish

(current fuel rails will fit the 90)

im still think about the 102, but the cost would include the 102 fuel rails, Xover line, 102(have to have an equal T/B) i may be missing something else right now cant think of it. Basically rounding out to about $1600+/-.


Quick Reply: Fast 90/92 or 102



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:53 AM.