What's up with Comp Cams ?
Kip deserves the business because he was the only one with a solution. Go read through that thread. See if any other vendors had any input or solutions before he came.
The issue here is a machining process that has not been discussed before and now is on the table for discussion. I learned something new as well.
There is a vendor feedback section if a vendor wants to explain his or hers commitment and quality of service of its employees, not here.
Now Kip(Cammotion), Lunati, Comp, etc.. who are actually designing the lobes, cutting, grinding, and machining the lobes are really the only people who need to be talking about the issue from a methods and processes stand point.
Thanks Kip for providing us with your hypothesis and providing a solution to the problem.
The vendors really should stay out of this. It has nothing to do with you except from a marketing standpoint. The SUPPLIER(s) are having problems.
Kip is a supplier. He understands the manufacturing of a cam and cam core. His insights are much appreciated.
If Comp wants to discuss technical issues in this thread, we welcome them. Same for Lunati.
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
The issue here is a machining process that has not been discussed before and now is on the table for discussion. I learned something new as well.
There is a vendor feedback section if a vendor wants to explain his or hers commitment and quality of service of its employees, not here.
Now Kip(Cammotion), Lunati, Comp, etc.. who are actually designing the lobes, cutting, grinding, and machining the lobes are really the only people who need to be talking about the issue from a methods and processes stand point.
Thanks Kip for providing us with your hypothesis and providing a solution to the problem.
I haven't read the whole thread, and I don't plan to. If Comp didn't have a representative in here while people were having issues, then Cam Motion has every right to come in here and offer their services. Martin should have forwarded this to our Comp representative and let them handle it. It goes back to the part in my post where I stated that Martin should learn how to pick his battles. I'm not saying that Cam Motion ever did anything wrong, and I'm definitely not saying that they had no desire to help someone with a problem. Although I suppose I can't know for absolute certainty that Kip helped those in need for no other reason than he wanted to help someone in need, I can only assume that his support was also expected to generate sales....as it certainly has from those he actually helped as well as several others in this thread now choosing not to purchase Comp cams. Business is business.
Our relationship with Comp is strong and we'll continue to do business with them as I feel they have great quality products, outstanding service, and very quick turn-around. Hopefully in the future they (Comp) will act quickly when problems arise so that we their vendor can continue to sell their products with confidence.
Comp puts out a product with quick turn aound, wow that's great. It's not hard to make a product quickly if you ignore QC.
https://ls1tech.com/forums/generatio...mp-cams-2.html
Along with this pic, too . . .
Here is a "rah-rah" article from 2011, BEFORE these problems appeared . . . Makes me wonder how much was only "HYPE", given what we see now.
http://www.practicalmachinist.com/vb...hining-237600/





