Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Basic cam question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 22, 2013 | 01:51 PM
  #1  
ls1kbush's Avatar
Thread Starter
On The Tree
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
From: cincinnati
Default Basic cam question

I got this motor through some trading and just have a few question.
LQ9 block bored to 4.005
6.125 eagle rods
4" callies crank
diamond pistons 4.005 with 28 cc dish
absolute speed stage 2 heads (806's) said to flow over 300 cfm
255/263 .623/.623 on a 116 lsa

My plans are to swap the pistons out for some flat tops which should net close to 11 to 1 compression with the current heads.
I have thoughts on porting a set of 706 heads I have laying around but I'm curious to how much the combustion chamber needs opened up for the 4" bore and how much cc's I will loose.
With the 706 heads I believe I would be near 11.7 to 1 or more.

My main question is on the cam.
Is it considered to be a nitrous cam or turbo cam?
Or is it good for either setup?
Nitrous would most likely be in the future.
Reply
Old Sep 22, 2013 | 02:01 PM
  #2  
ls1kbush's Avatar
Thread Starter
On The Tree
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
From: cincinnati
Default

Here is the cam card.

[IMG][/IMG]
Reply
Old Sep 22, 2013 | 08:54 PM
  #3  
sfrech182's Avatar
Teching In
 
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
From: SouthEast PA
Default

That is one beastly cam... based on the lobe separation and duration differences looks more suited boost. But my guess would be that it would work great with either one.
Reply
Old Sep 22, 2013 | 09:56 PM
  #4  
ls1kbush's Avatar
Thread Starter
On The Tree
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
From: cincinnati
Default

That's kinda what I was thinking. I haven't found many people running this big of a cam unless they just don't say anything.
Reply
Old Sep 22, 2013 | 10:10 PM
  #5  
smokeshow's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 6,687
Likes: 44
From: Detroit
Default

You couldn't pay me to run that cam with a turbo. Far more nitrous friendly..
Reply
Old Sep 22, 2013 | 10:56 PM
  #6  
ls1kbush's Avatar
Thread Starter
On The Tree
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
From: cincinnati
Default

Originally Posted by smokeshow
You couldn't pay me to run that cam with a turbo. Far more nitrous friendly..
That's what I was hoping to hear.
To me it seems like a possible good cam for high compression and still be able to run pump gas.
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2013 | 12:45 AM
  #7  
PREDATOR-Z's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 17
From: BFE
Default

Originally Posted by ls1kbush
That's what I was hoping to hear.
To me it seems like a possible good cam for high compression and still be able to run pump gas.
Yeah but 11:1 is not very high.
At what rpm range do you plan on using?
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2013 | 08:09 AM
  #8  
ls1kbush's Avatar
Thread Starter
On The Tree
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
From: cincinnati
Default

I race when ever I can and thats almost every week. I dont know what rpm's these motors are good for but I took my LS1 to 7k every weekend so I can assure you I will run it thru whatever usable rpm's I can.
But truthfully I would probably try to keep it under 7500 just to see it live longer.
I tend to shift when it stops pulling.

I know 11 to 1 isnt high compression.
Thats why I have been thinking about utilizing these 5.3 heads I have and unshroud the valves for the 4" bore and then open up the ports.
Or I can get some domed pistons and keep the heads I have but they are the ugly perimeter style but flow over 300 cfm
Reply




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:53 AM.