Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

862 Head milling for compression.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-28-2019, 07:20 AM
  #1  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
ShawnK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2019
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default 862 Head milling for compression.

Looking to increase the compression on my 5.3 gen 3 (lm7) engine that has 862 heads on it. Hoping to find the right amount of head milling and head gasket to get up to a compression ratio that will run on 91 octane. Also doing a small cam upgrade 212/218 but I’m sure the PTV will be fine since It’s minor modifications (pistons are dished).

Thanks for any input!
Old 12-28-2019, 09:16 AM
  #2  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (2)
 
wannafbody's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 4,740
Received 845 Likes on 647 Posts

Default

For that small of a cam I wouldn't bother with milling the heads. The 862 are the smallest chamber factory LS heads made. The heads you have will work with 87, 89, 91 or 93 octane.
Old 12-28-2019, 12:29 PM
  #3  
TECH Senior Member
 
G Atsma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Central Cal.
Posts: 21,159
Received 3,124 Likes on 2,437 Posts
Default

I see OP's point. The LM7 only has 9.5:1 compression. A .040 gasket might get him up to 9.72:1.
About .020 off the head besides the gasket mentioned will get him to just over 10:1
Old 12-28-2019, 02:32 PM
  #4  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (2)
 
wannafbody's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 4,740
Received 845 Likes on 647 Posts

Default

I didn't realize compression was that low on the LM7.
Old 12-29-2019, 12:03 AM
  #5  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (16)
 
1FastBrick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: JunkYard
Posts: 9,327
Received 438 Likes on 308 Posts

Default

862/706 with a factory 61cc chamber and a .051 thickness is 9.5:1. changing to .040 gasket will put you at .9.72:1

.025 will take you from 61CC down to 58CC. If you were at 9.5:1 stock it would put you at 9.83:1 milled.

If you went to a .040 head gasket in addition to milled heads then it would be about 10.08:1

Which 212/218 cam are you going to run?






Old 12-29-2019, 12:34 AM
  #6  
TECH Senior Member
 
G Atsma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Central Cal.
Posts: 21,159
Received 3,124 Likes on 2,437 Posts
Default

1FastBrick found my source! LOL!! Fun to play with..
Which number do you use for milling 862/706's? I thought .006 per 1cc reduction, coming up with about .020" for 3cc, but it looks like you use about .008/1cc to get .025" for a 3cc reduction.
I guess that could be different depending on the model of head.
Old 12-29-2019, 12:38 AM
  #7  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (16)
 
1FastBrick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: JunkYard
Posts: 9,327
Received 438 Likes on 308 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by G Atsma
1FastBrick found my source! LOL!! Fun to play with..
Which number do you use for milling 862/706's? I thought .006 per 1cc reduction, coming up with about .020" for 3cc, but it looks like you use about .008/1cc to get .025" for a 3cc reduction.
I guess that could be different depending on the model of head.
Its not a true number as each shape is different.

I just had some 706 heads done and they came out to 58cc with a .025 mill. I measured the stock castings around 61cc
The following users liked this post:
G Atsma (12-29-2019)
Old 12-29-2019, 12:49 AM
  #8  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (16)
 
1FastBrick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: JunkYard
Posts: 9,327
Received 438 Likes on 308 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by G Atsma
1FastBrick found my source! LOL!! Fun to play with..
Which number do you use for milling 862/706's? I thought .006 per 1cc reduction, coming up with about .020" for 3cc, but it looks like you use about .008/1cc to get .025" for a 3cc reduction.
I guess that could be different depending on the model of head.
As I mentioned size and shape of the chamber plays a role.

These are 706 stage 2 heads that where done by Richard at WCCH earlier this year.


Old 12-29-2019, 12:01 PM
  #9  
TECH Senior Member
 
G Atsma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Central Cal.
Posts: 21,159
Received 3,124 Likes on 2,437 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 1FastBrick
As I mentioned size and shape of the chamber plays a role.

These are 706 stage 2 heads that where done by Richard at WCCH earlier this year.
Thank you! Richard knows his stuff, especially lately with the 706/862 truck heads! Then I shall consider your numbers golden...
It appears .025 will get 706 heads down to 58cc instead of the .020 I mentioned. The smaller the chamber, the more cut per cc...
Old 12-29-2019, 01:59 PM
  #10  
TECH Apprentice
 
SoCalDave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: California
Posts: 337
Received 114 Likes on 89 Posts
Default

If your budjet allows have your 862 heads ported before you put them back on. A bump in compression and improved flow should do you well.
Old 01-13-2020, 05:14 PM
  #11  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
ShawnK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2019
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default more milling more head gasket

Is it possible to run a stock head gasket and mill the heads for .035 instead of .025 and still gain the 10:1 (ish) compression? (Thinner head gasket is very expensive) Also hoping to run Skip to the beginning of the images gallery

Stage 2 Thumpr 226/237 Hydraulic Roller Cam for GEN III LS 5.3 ls

will that still have safe PVC?
Old 01-13-2020, 05:54 PM
  #12  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (39)
 
LilJayV10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Evansville,IN
Posts: 9,457
Received 903 Likes on 644 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ShawnK
Is it possible to run a stock head gasket and mill the heads for .035 instead of .025 and still gain the 10:1 (ish) compression? (Thinner head gasket is very expensive) Also hoping to run Skip to the beginning of the images gallery

Stage 2 Thumpr 226/237 Hydraulic Roller Cam for GEN III LS 5.3 ls

will that still have safe PVC?
Thinner head gasket increases the quench which allows you to run higher compression with out detonation.

win, win
The following users liked this post:
G Atsma (01-13-2020)
Old 01-14-2020, 12:40 AM
  #13  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (5)
 
64post's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Sonoma Co. Ca.
Posts: 1,693
Received 226 Likes on 179 Posts

Default

Measure the chamber before and after you mill it, not all 862s are 61cc, (61.5) they can be as much as 63cc. I have run 11.6:1 static on 91 with 26* of total timing with less than .040” quench without detonation or timing retard.
The following users liked this post:
G Atsma (01-14-2020)
Old 01-14-2020, 12:53 AM
  #14  
TECH Senior Member
 
G Atsma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Central Cal.
Posts: 21,159
Received 3,124 Likes on 2,437 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 64post
Measure the chamber before and after you mill it, not all 862s are 61cc, (61.5) they can be as much as 63cc. I have run 11.6:1 static on 91 with 26* of total timing with less than .040” quench without detonation or timing retard.
That's better than I thought! How much compression could a guy get away with running 87 or 88 with a small (200-210 degrees intake at .050) cam?
Old 01-14-2020, 05:35 PM
  #15  
TECH Resident
 
cookseyb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 926
Received 17 Likes on 15 Posts

Default

Send the heads to (862-706) to Texas Speed and tell them what you need ,Awsom Results!!
Old 01-14-2020, 08:41 PM
  #16  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
 
patSS/00's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: AZ
Posts: 1,008
Received 14 Likes on 12 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 64post
Measure the chamber before and after you mill it, not all 862s are 61cc, (61.5) they can be as much as 63cc. I have run 11.6:1 static on 91 with 26* of total timing with less than .040” quench without detonation or timing retard.
What cam?
Old 01-15-2020, 10:54 PM
  #17  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (5)
 
64post's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Sonoma Co. Ca.
Posts: 1,693
Received 226 Likes on 179 Posts

Default

CamMotion Titan 4, 227-232@.050 113, 3.5* of overlap
Old 01-16-2020, 11:04 AM
  #18  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
 
patSS/00's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: AZ
Posts: 1,008
Received 14 Likes on 12 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 64post
CamMotion Titan 4, 227-232@.050 113, 3.5* of overlap
That puts you about 8.5 dynamic compression (using 11.6 static). Nice to have a real world example for running that high compression on 91.



Quick Reply: 862 Head milling for compression.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:07 PM.