Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Are LSK Lobes Compatible with 1.8 rockers

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-19-2005, 12:14 AM
  #1  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
 
DavidNJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 881
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Are LSK Lobes Compatible with 1.8 rockers

Like the 1.8 rockers that come in an LS7?
Old 08-19-2005, 04:26 AM
  #2  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (18)
 
DONAIMIAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: NW Houston, TX
Posts: 10,036
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

why would you need that much lift, just curious.
Old 08-19-2005, 08:18 AM
  #3  
LS1 Tech Administrator
iTrader: (14)
 
Patrick G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Victoria, TX
Posts: 8,244
Likes: 0
Received 32 Likes on 28 Posts

Default

That's some really, REALLY fast valve action. I guess with the right spring setup, anything is possible. My biggest concern is weight. The LS7 1.8 rockers might make it OK, but I'd be a little gun-shy about running the heavy Crane 1.8s with LSK lobes. Hope your heads flow well in the .700 lift range.
__________________

2013 Corvette Grand Sport A6 LME forged 416, Greg Good ported TFS 255 LS3 heads, 222/242 .629"/.604" 121LSA Pat G blower cam, ARH 1 7/8" headers, ESC Novi 1500 Supercharger w/8 rib direct drive conversion, 747rwhp/709rwtq on 93 octane, 801rwhp/735rwtq on race fuel, 10.1 @ 147.25mph 1/4 mile, 174.7mph Half Mile.
2016 Corvette Z51 M7 Magnuson Heartbeat 2300 supercharger, TSP LT headers, Pat G tuned, 667rwhp, 662rwtq, 191mph TX Mile.
2009.5 Pontiac G8 GT 6.0L, A6, AFR 230v2 heads. 506rwhp/442rwtq. 11.413 @ 121.29mph 1/4 mile, 168.7mph TX Mile
2000 Pewter Ram Air Trans Am M6 heads/cam 508 rwhp/445 rwtq SAE, 183.092 TX Mile
2018 Cadillac Escalade 6.2L A10 Pat G tuned.
LS1,LS2,LS3,LS7,LT1 Custom Camshaft Specialist For custom camshaft help press here.
Custom LSX tuning in person or via email press here.
Old 08-19-2005, 08:41 AM
  #4  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (14)
 
DAPSUPRSLO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Salisbury,MD
Posts: 1,729
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I don't think any hydraulic lifter will be able to see over 6500 rpm with that kind of lift but I could be wrong. Personally, I wouldn't try it, seems as though others are having a hard enough problem getting them to work with 1.7's. Now if you are not using hydraulic lifters then that's a whole different ball game.
Old 08-19-2005, 09:06 AM
  #5  
LS1 Tech Administrator
iTrader: (14)
 
Patrick G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Victoria, TX
Posts: 8,244
Likes: 0
Received 32 Likes on 28 Posts

Default

No problems with LSK lobes here, but I agree with you SUPRSLO, you'd probably want to get a really good lifter like Morels to work best with that kind of aggressive combination.
Old 08-19-2005, 12:42 PM
  #6  
On The Tree
 
gtovan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The Morel hydraulic lifters are only rated to handle .670" lift so I would guess w/ LSK lobes and a 1.8/1 rocker ratio you would need a solid lifter setup, but I bet there will be some new hydraulic lifters out in the near future that can handle more lift due to the capabilities of the LS7 heads. I'm using Morel lifters on my LSK lobed cam but with a 1:7/1 ratio Jesel rocker
Old 08-19-2005, 07:00 PM
  #7  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
 
DavidNJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 881
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by stang killer
why would you need that much lift, just curious.
You want to retard the intake closing to add dynamic compression, reduce overlap for emissions, and advance exhaust opening to increase the power stroke. Best done with the most flow with the shortest duration that meets the overall performance goals. More duration and overlap comes at the expense of low speed flexibility, emissions,and fuel economy. The expression 'coming on the cam' springs to mind.

An example is the LS7 which has a 211deg intake and a 230 exhaust with 120+ separation. The best possible with emissions contraints. Since we don't have to warranty that the valve springs will last 100,000 miles for emissions, we can use a cam that the factory won't.
Old 08-19-2005, 07:05 PM
  #8  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
 
DavidNJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 881
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Patrick G
Hope your heads flow well in the .700 lift range.
I am on the list for a Z06...the LS7 heads flow well. I was thinking about a 223 which would be around .67 with 1.8 rockers.

Peak flow is really not an issue unless you get a serious airflow problem. The cam has more duration at .6, .5, .4, .3...all of which count more.

Part of me still thinks I would be happier with a modified regular C5 or C6.




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:58 PM.