Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

What is my engine? (i've searched)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-17-2006, 08:38 PM
  #1  
Teching In
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
soon2brb240's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default What is my engine? (i've searched)

Ok, i'm getting a 6.0 from an 04 yukon denali tomorrow, and I'm not sure if its an lq4 or an lq9. I am putting this into my 97 240sx with an lsx intake mani, possibly 243 heads or 241's, and probably an ls6 cam. I plan on remaining all motor for quite a while, so i hope this is an lq9. Anyway, thanks in advance!
Old 09-17-2006, 08:51 PM
  #2  
TECH Resident
 
Order 66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 762
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

LQ9. Changing the heads to 243 will just increase your compression.
Old 09-17-2006, 09:05 PM
  #3  
Teching In
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
soon2brb240's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

HA! Awesome! I know it will increase the compression, does anyone know specifically how much it will be once i put the 243 heads on? Its gonna be a daily driver, so i dont want to have to run race gas. Also, after i get it i'll be willing to trade the complete heads to a FI guy for some 243's...
Thanks again guys!
Old 09-17-2006, 10:09 PM
  #4  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (14)
 
ArcticZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Alexandria, VA
Posts: 5,125
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

You won't have to run race gas with 243 heads on an LQ9 especially with just an LS6 cam. Stick with 93 and you should be good to go.
Old 09-17-2006, 10:32 PM
  #5  
Teching In
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
soon2brb240's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ArcticZ28
You won't have to run race gas with 243 heads on an LQ9 especially with just an LS6 cam. Stick with 93 and you should be good to go.
Thanks for the help guys, my first car was a 79 camaro with a 350 that i put edelbrock torquer 2 cam and intake with a holly 750 carb...but those days are long ago. Since then i've had an Integra, a civic, and now my 240. I've been out of this v8 stuff for a while. Does anyone know about what the compression will be with the 243 heads on the lq9?
Old 09-17-2006, 11:07 PM
  #6  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (47)
 
The stunningman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 761
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

10. is stock LQ9 has a flattop piston
9.5 is a lq4 with the 243's I am told the dish piston will be 10.9

could very well put you 10.6

Edit I have since looked this up
LQ9 is 10. to 1
LQ4 is 9.4 to 1

Last edited by The stunningman; 09-18-2006 at 06:57 AM.
Old 09-17-2006, 11:11 PM
  #7  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (14)
 
ArcticZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Alexandria, VA
Posts: 5,125
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

You'll be bumping up static compression by about .9 . So, you're looking at approximately 11:1 using stock .052 GM MLS head gaskets since I believe the stock CR on the LQ9's in that year were ~10.1:1.
Old 09-17-2006, 11:23 PM
  #8  
Teching In
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
soon2brb240's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Ok, i'm confused now. Those are 2 very differing answers. I was under the impression that the lq4 with the 243 heads would yield about 10:1 compression, and the lq9 with 243 heads would be 11:1ish. Maybe i should start a new thread about this..haha. What is the general rule of thumb that is safe to run on pump 93?
Old 09-17-2006, 11:41 PM
  #9  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (14)
 
ArcticZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Alexandria, VA
Posts: 5,125
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

LQ9's in that year come at 10.1:1, I'm not sure about the LQ4's but it doesn't matter b/c you won't have one.

Dynamic compression ratio is a more determining factor on what octane you need to run. The numbers people tend to shoot for are somewhere in the 8.5-8.6:1 DCR to be safe to run on 93 pump gas. Of course other factors come into play such as your quench area, your DA, etc. However, on a very general note, if you stay below 8.5:1 DCR you should be good to go.
Old 09-17-2006, 11:55 PM
  #10  
Teching In
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
soon2brb240's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

All sounds well, i'm sure i'll be fine as i see lots of other people here running the lq9 with 243 heads. Hope all goes well tomorrow with getting this motor, i'm looking forward to getting started putting this swap together and making some noise with this 240!
Old 09-18-2006, 12:27 PM
  #11  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (28)
 
gnx7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 3,483
Received 169 Likes on 111 Posts

Default

Remember that the thickness of the head gasket can change your compression ratio nearly 1/2 point.

I have a stock LS1 shortblock with 62cc AFR 205's heads and GM MLS head gaskets (10.7:1). With Cometic .040" head gaskets my compression would've been about 11:1. In hindsight I should've gone with the Cometics due to more torque potential from the higher compression.... but they were twice as much and I flinched and went with the MLS.

Run the most compression you can for the best gas you can get at the pump. 11:1 for 91 octane and a big cam is easy... with 93 octane you can run more rather comfortably.
Old 09-19-2006, 07:10 PM
  #12  
Teching In
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
soon2brb240's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Just a little update. I tried to get the motor yesterday, and found out that the salvage yard basically took the entire intake manifold with everything on it off. And it evidently had wiring issues... On top of all that, the place still wanted $1900 for it (original price). I was a little bummed, but today i have located another engine from an 04 denali. The owner of the salvage yard thinks this is an lq4, but I trust ls1tech way more than I trust some salvage yard in Arkansas I let him think that it was an lq4 so i'm getting a nice deal on it because he thinks its an lq4 when i know that it is in fact an lq9. What do you guys think to reach about 450 whp with this thing running 243 heads, ls6 intake? I'm just wondering what cam would be good for my goal. Thanks again for all the help guys!
Old 09-23-2006, 06:32 PM
  #13  
Teching In
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
soon2brb240's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Ok, just picked up my new motor today. The yard i got it from provided me with a vin, so i plugged it into carfax.com and the engine is in fact from an 04 sierra denali 4 door. It is a 6.0. The only confusion is this motor is an lq9 according to people on here and some other sources. I found an online specs website that states it is an lq4. Is there any way to know for sure? I'm really hoping its an lq9, but I guess i could use cometic gaskets to get the compression up to where i want it. Any input? Thanks guys!
Old 09-23-2006, 06:35 PM
  #14  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (14)
 
ArcticZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Alexandria, VA
Posts: 5,125
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Not sure why it's stating that but the Denali option for the Yukon in 2004 was in fact the LQ9. It was only the regular Yukon's that got the 5.3 liter LQ4.
Old 09-23-2006, 07:15 PM
  #15  
Teching In
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
soon2brb240's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ArcticZ28
Not sure why it's stating that but the Denali option for the Yukon in 2004 was in fact the LQ9. It was only the regular Yukon's that got the 5.3 liter LQ4.
It actually came from a sierra denali. Just to see, i checked yukon denali on the same specs site, and it said lq4 as well. I think its just not a very reputable source. Is it correct to assume that the lq4 is generally the "work" version of the 6.0, where the lq9 is the "everyday/luxary" version?
Old 09-23-2006, 08:01 PM
  #16  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (14)
 
ArcticZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Alexandria, VA
Posts: 5,125
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Well, just did some more searching around and according to wikipedia it says you have the LQ4. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GM_Vortec_engine#6000 . I could have sworn the Denali's had the LQ9 but I can't say for sure now with so many confusing sources. I know the 02+ escalades had the LQ9 and I thought the denali versions of things had them as well, but now I'm confused as all get out.

To answer your question though, the LQ9's are the "high output" versions of the LQ4 with the bumped up compression.
Old 09-24-2006, 12:18 PM
  #17  
Teching In
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
soon2brb240's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Well hell, guess its gonna be some cometic gaskets for me. I'm sure .3 difference in compression wont keep me from my goal of 430 - 450 whp. Thanks for helping me with the search!




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:31 PM.