Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

MAC VS. FLP

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 3, 2002 | 01:00 PM
  #1  
BIGBOS's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 11,603
Likes: 0
From: Chi-Town, IL
Default Re: MAC VS. FLP

What do you plan on doing in the future??
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2002 | 01:02 PM
  #2  
CHRISPY's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 10,341
Likes: 1
Default Re: MAC VS. FLP

Go with the hooker longtubes and side exit 2.5 inch duals with Borla Xr1's and or cats.
That would be the ticket and cheap as dirt to do <img src="gr_grin.gif" border="0">

Chris
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2002 | 01:08 PM
  #3  
ExtremeZ28's Avatar
TECH Resident
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 808
Likes: 0
From: Richmond,Va
Default Re: MAC VS. FLP

FLP's! i picked up 17rwhp and 22 rwtq with em here is a comparison graph from my old dyno to my new one...
[img]ttp://community.webshots.com/storage/1/v3/5/35/79/28153579pLRdGOSJEt_ph.jpg[/img]
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2002 | 01:09 PM
  #4  
NataSS Inc's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 5,395
Likes: 1
From: Estero, FL
Default Re: MAC VS. FLP

nothing to agressive maybe an LS6 intake and the new electric water pump from....I cant remeber the name of the place. but mostly bolt ons.
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2002 | 01:13 PM
  #5  
Visceral's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,865
Likes: 2
From: Portland, OR
Default Re: MAC VS. FLP

Ummm... jmX just did the switch from MAC to FLPs... I'll see if I can find the posts. He had alot of contructive things to say.

Chris
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2002 | 01:17 PM
  #6  
NataSS Inc's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 5,395
Likes: 1
From: Estero, FL
Default Re: MAC VS. FLP

I would like to hear what he has to say. The one thing I like about the FLP is that its a full system and the only thing I have to worry about is welding the pipe to the can for the most part. And things are a little more extensive with everything else.

NataSS®
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2002 | 01:20 PM
  #7  
Visceral's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,865
Likes: 2
From: Portland, OR
Default Re: MAC VS. FLP

https://ls1tech.com/ubb/cgi-bin/ulti...c&f=1&t=000613

https://ls1tech.com/ubb/cgi-bin/ulti...c&f=1&t=000725

https://ls1tech.com/ubb/cgi-bin/ulti...c&f=1&t=001225

https://ls1tech.com/ubb/cgi-bin/ulti...c&f=1&t=001430

https://ls1tech.com/ubb/cgi-bin/ulti...c&f=1&t=001516

That should get you started <img src="gr_stretch.gif" border="0">

Enjoy!

Chris
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2002 | 01:21 PM
  #8  
Trevor @ Texas Speed & Perf.'s Avatar
LS1Tech Premium Sponsor
20 Year Member
Active Streak: 30 Days
Active Streak: 60 Days
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 4,399
Likes: 5
From: Lubbock, Texas
Default Re: MAC VS. FLP

I love my FLP's. I just switched insurance companies, and they want me to get both vehicles inspected. I'm gonna install the cats and pass with flying colors. <img src="gr_stretch.gif" border="0"> The FLP's will also allow me to achieve max power when I start tearing into the engine. I could post a dyno comparison of the Macs vs. the FLP's on my 383. I know you said you aren't doing anything radical, but it really shows you how the mid-range power, along with top-end, is affected.
__________________
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2002 | 01:51 PM
  #9  
Kilroy's 99 TA's Avatar
On The Tree
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 122
Likes: 0
From: Itasca, IL
Default Re: MAC VS. FLP

Are the MAC CATs really that bad?
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2002 | 01:57 PM
  #10  
NataSS Inc's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 5,395
Likes: 1
From: Estero, FL
Default Re: MAC VS. FLP

anyone have pictures of the FLP's in an 99-00 SS. I have an Eibach pro kit so the car sits a little lower than stock but not to bad. Will I have to worry about the hang down of the FLP's?
NataSS®
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2002 | 06:31 PM
  #11  
Damian's Avatar
LSX Mechanic
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (89)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 10,396
Likes: 13
From: Atlanta
Default Re: MAC VS. FLP

[quote]Originally posted by Kilroy's 99 TA:
<strong>Are the MAC CATs really that bad?</strong><hr></blockquote>

These cats has been proven to flow worse than stock.
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2002 | 10:28 PM
  #12  
Red Dragon's Avatar
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Default Re: MAC VS. FLP

What if you didn't plan on going into your engine wouldn't the MAC medium length headers be better than the FLP long tubes wouldn't the long tubes be too much exhaust for the engine or not ???
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2002 | 10:42 PM
  #13  
Crazyquik's Avatar
TECH Addict
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,556
Likes: 0
From: Nawf Carolina
Default Re: MAC VS. FLP

If you just plan on bolt ons, MACs are considered better because the hp difference isn't that much and the money difference is huge. But the FLPs aren't "too much" for the motor. There are only 2 LS1 headers that I can think of, and one isnt even made anymore, that would be considered "too much" for bolt on LS1.

J.
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2002 | 12:53 AM
  #14  
NataSS Inc's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 5,395
Likes: 1
From: Estero, FL
Default MAC VS. FLP

This is the question of the ages and I know it has no REAL answer. Depending on setup etc etc etc. I am going to be putting in amn MTI lid at the same time. Which route would be better. Or should I wait to see what the hooker LT's have been checked out.
Reply




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:35 AM.