Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

6.0 heads vs LS6 heads for 422/427 Iron Block Engines???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-30-2002, 01:29 PM
  #1  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
RDF 2000 T/A's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Leonardtown, MD
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default 6.0 heads vs LS6 heads for 422/427 Iron Block Engines???

Yes I know there is a search button but most of what I've found has to do with stock displacement cars. I did find one link that brought this topic up though. I'll be running a 422 (close enough) 4.030 bore 4.125 stroke and want to run heads that obviously will give me the most power. I'm not worried about price here, just the performance differences. I've heard good about both. If the car does have a power adder in the future it would be nitrous so my ideal compression ratio I would think would be near 11:1 or so.

Thanks, again everyone
Old 09-30-2002, 01:46 PM
  #2  
TECH Apprentice
 
JP98SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Alta Loma, CA
Posts: 358
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: 6.0 heads vs LS6 heads for 422/427 Iron Block Engines???

I have a set of 6.0L heads with 75 cc chambers. I know of sets that are as small as 65cc. The 6.0L heads have better mid lift #'s than the LS6 heads. For an all out solid roller high lift motor the LS6 heads might be able to overcome their shortcomings in midlift flow. For the majority of hyd cam street cars the 6.0L heads should perform better.
Old 09-30-2002, 04:36 PM
  #3  
On The Tree
 
kewlbrz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 191
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Re: 6.0 heads vs LS6 heads for 422/427 Iron Block Engines???

Are you referring the the LQ4 Iron 6.0 heads, or the LQ9 Aluminum 6.0 heads?
Old 10-01-2002, 06:32 AM
  #4  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
RDF 2000 T/A's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Leonardtown, MD
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: 6.0 heads vs LS6 heads for 422/427 Iron Block Engines???

6.0 aluminum heads <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="gr_stretch.gif" />
Old 10-01-2002, 08:50 AM
  #5  
TECH Enthusiast
 
ScottyG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Orange, TX
Posts: 526
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default Re: 6.0 heads vs LS6 heads for 422/427 Iron Block Engines???

This is a good topic.

I'm more interested in a truly street-worthy hyd setup rather than an all-out solid roller motor, but I'd still like to see the pros and cons for either head on both motor setups.
Old 10-01-2002, 09:27 AM
  #6  
TECH Senior Member
 
CHRISPY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 10,341
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default Re: 6.0 heads vs LS6 heads for 422/427 Iron Block Engines???

You are going to be spraying the car eventually right?

I would go fully ported 6L heads with peak flow numbers in the .560-.580 range.

Then run a decent sized hyd cam (240/244 range and keep the lift matched to the heads (say in the .570 range)

That with double springs will live a long time on the street and the double springs with that lift will take a lot of nitrous abuse.

Also you wont have to pay out the *** for those Ls6 heads <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="gr_stretch.gif" />

I would think 485RWHP NA would be no problem with that combo and you could spray the bejesus out of it <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="gr_grin.gif" />
Be sure to get headstuds and good gaskets as well.
cheers,
Chris
Old 10-01-2002, 10:52 AM
  #7  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
Hardtop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: LaPlata, Md.
Posts: 1,706
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default Re: 6.0 heads vs LS6 heads for 422/427 Iron Block Engines???

Hey RDF give me the keys when your finished for a couple of passes at MIR. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="gr_grin.gif" /> Have you considered an iron block setup? Thats what I'm thinking about for next year. Since you say your going to spray the hell out of it I think iron block would be more reliable in the long run. Who cares about the extra weight, you can get most of it back with a K-member and a Hawker battery. Just my .02. Good luck.

Bruce
Old 10-01-2002, 11:04 AM
  #8  
Teching In
 
MicahOWNSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Burbank, CA
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: 6.0 heads vs LS6 heads for 422/427 Iron Block Engines???

My LQ9's are making 11.2:1 compression ratio on a stock bottom end. I think that's a 58cc chamber?
Old 10-01-2002, 11:54 AM
  #9  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
RDF 2000 T/A's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Leonardtown, MD
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: 6.0 heads vs LS6 heads for 422/427 Iron Block Engines???

Bruce, In the topic title I said heads for iron block engines. The Iron Block is being ordered today (while they are on sale) I don't even wanna mess with a re-sleeved block, I want this thing to last for a long time. I'll be on motor mostly but Might spray it a a few times.... Iron blocks are also alot cheaper <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="gr_stretch.gif" /> Bruce we can have a Iron Block Club lol...

<small>[ October 01, 2002, 11:57 AM: Message edited by: RDF 2000 T/A ]</small>
Old 10-01-2002, 04:34 PM
  #10  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (21)
 
1CAMWNDR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 4,247
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default Re: 6.0 heads vs LS6 heads for 422/427 Iron Block Engines???

Ya know, since you drive a T/A; you don't need to call that motor a "422 or close enough". THAT IS A 421 SUPER DUTY MAN!!!!!!!!! <img border="0" alt="[Burnout]" title="" src="graemlins/burnout.gif" />
<img border="0" alt="[Firebird]" title="" src="graemlins/formula.gif" />
Old 10-02-2002, 12:11 AM
  #11  
Dumb Ass Vette Moderator
iTrader: (20)
 
ls1290's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Colorado
Posts: 4,279
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default Re: 6.0 heads vs LS6 heads for 422/427 Iron Block Engines???

</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by MicahOWNSS:
<strong>My LQ9's are making 11.2:1 compression ratio on a stock bottom end. I think that's a 58cc chamber?</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">For 11.2 compression on stock bottom end, the chambers would be 59cc. <- <img border="0" title="" alt="[Eek!]" src="gr_eek2.gif" /> Did you have a lot of material welded in? To go from 69cc to 59cc needs a **** load of work done to the heads.




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:39 PM.