Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

The "recipe" to 500 rwhp with heads and cam.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-27-2010 | 06:35 AM
  #321  
sjsingle1's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
10 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 6,575
Likes: 255
From: Fort Worth TX
Default

parts have been improved since the OP.....maybe time for a update?
Old 12-27-2010 | 07:00 AM
  #322  
S2VYSS's Avatar
Launching!
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 281
Likes: 0
From: Melbourne, Australia
Default

Originally Posted by sjsingle1
parts have been improved since the OP.....maybe time for a update?
Has there been any significant improvements worth noting? I'm only asking because I was thinking that surely there has been improvements made in some areas

I realise that the forumla to make this kind of power is careful planning and the best parts money can buy

Would there been much of an increase on Pat's original setup with the Fast 102 manifold setup?
Old 12-28-2010 | 07:15 PM
  #323  
hammertime's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,436
Likes: 2
From: Smithton, IL
Default

Keep in mind that very little of this combo was actually comprised of "off the shelf" parts. Improvements have been made to the heads and intake used, and some different lobe profiles are available now. Would any of these significantly change the output?

What I have read of the FAST 102 is that several of the shortcomings have been addressed. For a guy who can't or won't pony up the bucks for porting, that means his results would be better than the same setup with a box stock FAST 90/92. It's hard to imagine the TB as the restriction here at 347ci when guys are running the same manifold on 408+ engines.

Much of the same can be said about the updates in the AFR line of heads. The key thing here is max attention to detail. Tony Mamo didn't leave much on the table when he hand ported the heads and intake for Pat's setup. What has occurred in the last three and a half years is a boon for the consumer. With out of the box parts and attention to detail, you might very well get 95% of the results Tony and Pat were able to achieve and at a significant discount when you figure what Tony's labor costs.

As for cam lobes, I imagine the same valve events ground on EPS lobes could make more power through slight improvements in stability. Again, there wasn't much left to improve as Pat has been setting up more aggressive XFI and LSK cam lobes for some time.
Old 01-21-2011 | 11:24 AM
  #324  
trans_am7935's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,453
Likes: 3
From: Glen Burnie, MD
Default

i am still wanting to see someone make 500hp with a stock bottom end LS1 on the new LSL lobed LSR cams. i am looking at the 231/239 .614/.624 113 LSA cam and hoping to make 260+ with PRC heads.

Last edited by trans_am7935; 01-21-2011 at 11:36 AM.
Old 01-21-2011 | 11:30 AM
  #325  
SOMbitch's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 6,881
Likes: 3
Default

Originally Posted by trans_am7935
i am still wanting to see someone make 500hp with a stock bottom end LS1 on the new LSL lobed LSR cams. i am looking at the 231/239 .614/.624 113 LSR cam and hoping to make 260+ with PRC heads.

Fixed..just didn't want anybody to get confused...... LSR cams use LSL lobes...
Old 01-21-2011 | 11:36 AM
  #326  
trans_am7935's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,453
Likes: 3
From: Glen Burnie, MD
Default

Originally Posted by SOMbitch
Fixed..just didn't want anybody to get confused...... LSR cams use LSL lobes...
thanks, fixed
Old 02-12-2011 | 10:02 PM
  #327  
LSxWS.6's Avatar
On The Tree
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by trans_am7935
i am still wanting to see someone make 500hp with a stock bottom end LS1 on the new LSL lobed LSR cams. i am looking at the 231/239 .614/.624 113 LSA cam and hoping to make 260+ with PRC heads.
260+ whp??? with heads and cam plus your fast 92?
Old 02-15-2011 | 07:59 PM
  #328  
chrs1313's Avatar
10 Second Club
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,697
Likes: 4
Default

Originally Posted by trans_am7935
i am still wanting to see someone make 500hp with a stock bottom end LS1 on the new LSL lobed LSR cams. i am looking at the 231/239 .614/.624 113 LSA cam and hoping to make 260+ with PRC heads.
if i had a m6 would be 15-20hp higher...

https://ls1tech.com/forums/dynamomet...p-426rwtq.html

lsl/lsl lobe cam (speced by Patrick G)
Old 02-15-2011 | 08:39 PM
  #329  
bayer-z28's Avatar
TECH Veteran

iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 4,085
Likes: 0
From: N. Falmouth MA
Default

^ I'm getting a little closer with the 102 swap.

I've been using this as my bible since I first read it. It's my end goal to extract all I can out of this cam. (PatG cam)
Old 02-27-2011 | 02:25 PM
  #330  
jimbos'ss's Avatar
12 Second Club
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 201
Likes: 0
From: Killeen,TX
Default

click awesome write up!
Old 02-27-2011 | 05:50 PM
  #331  
trans_am7935's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,453
Likes: 3
From: Glen Burnie, MD
Default

Originally Posted by chrs1313
if i had a m6 would be 15-20hp higher...

https://ls1tech.com/forums/dynamomet...p-426rwtq.html

lsl/lsl lobe cam (speced by Patrick G)
so is the cam that i cam getting (227/235) gonna put me at a very nice rwhp number with 5.3 heads.

also chris, are you using stock rockers or roller rockers?

Last edited by trans_am7935; 02-27-2011 at 07:05 PM.
Old 03-03-2011 | 12:58 AM
  #332  
Kirby's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast

 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 598
Likes: 0
From: Midland, TX
Default

subscribed!
Old 03-11-2011 | 09:05 PM
  #333  
JayplaySS's Avatar
Moderator
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,615
Likes: 161
From: Miami, OH
Default

Pat, what size pushrods did you end up with? Not the length, the diameter?

Thank you-
Old 03-31-2011 | 06:17 AM
  #334  
S2VYSS's Avatar
Launching!
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 281
Likes: 0
From: Melbourne, Australia
Default

Would there be more power to be gained from this combo if it was tuned on E85? Would it be worth swapping to E85 or would the gains not make it worth while?
Old 03-31-2011 | 06:47 AM
  #335  
Vetal's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,974
Likes: 0
From: Latvia
Default

If I remember correctly E85 has the potential to produce 9-11% more power with the same amount of air, so I guess it should produce more
Old 03-31-2011 | 07:09 AM
  #336  
Patrick G's Avatar
Thread Starter
LS1 Tech Administrator
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 8,245
Likes: 32
From: Victoria, TX
Default

Originally Posted by JayplaySS2
Pat, what size pushrods did you end up with? Not the length, the diameter?

Thank you-
We used stock diameter chrome moly pushrods at the time. The larger diameter Manton pushrods would certainly be worth considering though as they improve valvetrain stability with really stout spring setups. My 500rwhp combo ran AFR 8019 springs which are equivalent to Patriot Extreme Gold Duals which are very common these days.
__________________

2013 Corvette Grand Sport A6 LME forged 416, Greg Good ported TFS 255 LS3 heads, 222/242 .629"/.604" 121LSA Pat G blower cam, ARH 1 7/8" headers, ESC Novi 1500 Supercharger w/8 rib direct drive conversion, 747rwhp/709rwtq on 93 octane, 801rwhp/735rwtq on race fuel, 10.1 @ 147.25mph 1/4 mile, 174.7mph Half Mile.
2016 Corvette Z51 M7 Magnuson Heartbeat 2300 supercharger, TSP LT headers, Pat G tuned, 667rwhp, 662rwtq, 191mph TX Mile.
2009.5 Pontiac G8 GT 6.0L, A6, AFR 230v2 heads. 506rwhp/442rwtq. 11.413 @ 121.29mph 1/4 mile, 168.7mph TX Mile
2000 Pewter Ram Air Trans Am M6 heads/cam 508 rwhp/445 rwtq SAE, 183.092 TX Mile
2022 Cadillac Escalade 6.2L A10 S&B CAI, Corsa catback.
2023 Corvette 3LT Z51 soon to be modified.
Custom LSX tuning in person or via email press here.

Old 03-31-2011 | 03:23 PM
  #337  
somethingelse's Avatar
Teching In
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Default

Several in our area are running E85 on LS1 and LS2 engines, including myself.

2-3% power and 3-5% torque have been typical. If you are within 10-15 HP, then it could help you reach your goal.

The 9-10% referenced is likely related to the FI crowd...the cooling affect of E85 tends to provide bigger gains for them.

Last edited by somethingelse; 03-31-2011 at 03:35 PM. Reason: add info
Old 04-24-2011 | 03:33 PM
  #338  
PAT99camaross's Avatar
Teching In
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
From: akron
Default

keeping this one for later
Old 05-12-2011 | 08:07 AM
  #339  
dnkynrbk's Avatar
9 Second Club

iTrader: (34)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,248
Likes: 0
From: SPRINGFIELD MISSOURI
Default

can you build a 500rhp ith a ported vic and accub4150 track only car wt350
Old 05-12-2011 | 10:56 AM
  #340  
usmonaro's Avatar
Launching!
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 206
Likes: 0
From: Dickson, TN
Default

On the rod bolts again. Since my post was closed and this one is allowed to continue... How do you resize rod bolts?
I'm debating on ARP, but there is two different types. Hi-perf & Professional series. Anyone know the difference?
If resizing is too much work I may just go with the Katech's but I can get the ARP's cheap where I work.


Quick Reply: The "recipe" to 500 rwhp with heads and cam.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:45 AM.