The "recipe" to 500 rwhp with heads and cam.
#322
Has there been any significant improvements worth noting? I'm only asking because I was thinking that surely there has been improvements made in some areas
I realise that the forumla to make this kind of power is careful planning and the best parts money can buy
Would there been much of an increase on Pat's original setup with the Fast 102 manifold setup?
I realise that the forumla to make this kind of power is careful planning and the best parts money can buy
Would there been much of an increase on Pat's original setup with the Fast 102 manifold setup?
#323
Keep in mind that very little of this combo was actually comprised of "off the shelf" parts. Improvements have been made to the heads and intake used, and some different lobe profiles are available now. Would any of these significantly change the output?
What I have read of the FAST 102 is that several of the shortcomings have been addressed. For a guy who can't or won't pony up the bucks for porting, that means his results would be better than the same setup with a box stock FAST 90/92. It's hard to imagine the TB as the restriction here at 347ci when guys are running the same manifold on 408+ engines.
Much of the same can be said about the updates in the AFR line of heads. The key thing here is max attention to detail. Tony Mamo didn't leave much on the table when he hand ported the heads and intake for Pat's setup. What has occurred in the last three and a half years is a boon for the consumer. With out of the box parts and attention to detail, you might very well get 95% of the results Tony and Pat were able to achieve and at a significant discount when you figure what Tony's labor costs.
As for cam lobes, I imagine the same valve events ground on EPS lobes could make more power through slight improvements in stability. Again, there wasn't much left to improve as Pat has been setting up more aggressive XFI and LSK cam lobes for some time.
What I have read of the FAST 102 is that several of the shortcomings have been addressed. For a guy who can't or won't pony up the bucks for porting, that means his results would be better than the same setup with a box stock FAST 90/92. It's hard to imagine the TB as the restriction here at 347ci when guys are running the same manifold on 408+ engines.
Much of the same can be said about the updates in the AFR line of heads. The key thing here is max attention to detail. Tony Mamo didn't leave much on the table when he hand ported the heads and intake for Pat's setup. What has occurred in the last three and a half years is a boon for the consumer. With out of the box parts and attention to detail, you might very well get 95% of the results Tony and Pat were able to achieve and at a significant discount when you figure what Tony's labor costs.
As for cam lobes, I imagine the same valve events ground on EPS lobes could make more power through slight improvements in stability. Again, there wasn't much left to improve as Pat has been setting up more aggressive XFI and LSK cam lobes for some time.
#324
i am still wanting to see someone make 500hp with a stock bottom end LS1 on the new LSL lobed LSR cams. i am looking at the 231/239 .614/.624 113 LSA cam and hoping to make 260+ with PRC heads.
Last edited by trans_am7935; 01-21-2011 at 11:36 AM.
#325
Fixed..just didn't want anybody to get confused...... LSR cams use LSL lobes...
#327
#328
https://ls1tech.com/forums/dynamomet...p-426rwtq.html
lsl/lsl lobe cam (speced by Patrick G)
#331
if i had a m6 would be 15-20hp higher...
https://ls1tech.com/forums/dynamomet...p-426rwtq.html
lsl/lsl lobe cam (speced by Patrick G)
https://ls1tech.com/forums/dynamomet...p-426rwtq.html
lsl/lsl lobe cam (speced by Patrick G)
also chris, are you using stock rockers or roller rockers?
Last edited by trans_am7935; 02-27-2011 at 07:05 PM.
#336
Thread Starter
LS1 Tech Administrator
iTrader: (14)
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 8,245
Likes: 32
From: Victoria, TX
We used stock diameter chrome moly pushrods at the time. The larger diameter Manton pushrods would certainly be worth considering though as they improve valvetrain stability with really stout spring setups. My 500rwhp combo ran AFR 8019 springs which are equivalent to Patriot Extreme Gold Duals which are very common these days.
__________________
2013 Corvette Grand Sport A6 LME forged 416, Greg Good ported TFS 255 LS3 heads, 222/242 .629"/.604" 121LSA Pat G blower cam, ARH 1 7/8" headers, ESC Novi 1500 Supercharger w/8 rib direct drive conversion, 747rwhp/709rwtq on 93 octane, 801rwhp/735rwtq on race fuel, 10.1 @ 147.25mph 1/4 mile, 174.7mph Half Mile.
2016 Corvette Z51 M7 Magnuson Heartbeat 2300 supercharger, TSP LT headers, Pat G tuned, 667rwhp, 662rwtq, 191mph TX Mile.
2009.5 Pontiac G8 GT 6.0L, A6, AFR 230v2 heads. 506rwhp/442rwtq. 11.413 @ 121.29mph 1/4 mile, 168.7mph TX Mile
2000 Pewter Ram Air Trans Am M6 heads/cam 508 rwhp/445 rwtq SAE, 183.092 TX Mile
2022 Cadillac Escalade 6.2L A10 S&B CAI, Corsa catback.
2023 Corvette 3LT Z51 soon to be modified.
Custom LSX tuning in person or via email press here.
2013 Corvette Grand Sport A6 LME forged 416, Greg Good ported TFS 255 LS3 heads, 222/242 .629"/.604" 121LSA Pat G blower cam, ARH 1 7/8" headers, ESC Novi 1500 Supercharger w/8 rib direct drive conversion, 747rwhp/709rwtq on 93 octane, 801rwhp/735rwtq on race fuel, 10.1 @ 147.25mph 1/4 mile, 174.7mph Half Mile.
2016 Corvette Z51 M7 Magnuson Heartbeat 2300 supercharger, TSP LT headers, Pat G tuned, 667rwhp, 662rwtq, 191mph TX Mile.
2009.5 Pontiac G8 GT 6.0L, A6, AFR 230v2 heads. 506rwhp/442rwtq. 11.413 @ 121.29mph 1/4 mile, 168.7mph TX Mile
2000 Pewter Ram Air Trans Am M6 heads/cam 508 rwhp/445 rwtq SAE, 183.092 TX Mile
2022 Cadillac Escalade 6.2L A10 S&B CAI, Corsa catback.
2023 Corvette 3LT Z51 soon to be modified.
Custom LSX tuning in person or via email press here.
#337
Several in our area are running E85 on LS1 and LS2 engines, including myself.
2-3% power and 3-5% torque have been typical. If you are within 10-15 HP, then it could help you reach your goal.
The 9-10% referenced is likely related to the FI crowd...the cooling affect of E85 tends to provide bigger gains for them.
2-3% power and 3-5% torque have been typical. If you are within 10-15 HP, then it could help you reach your goal.
The 9-10% referenced is likely related to the FI crowd...the cooling affect of E85 tends to provide bigger gains for them.
Last edited by somethingelse; 03-31-2011 at 03:35 PM. Reason: add info
#340
On the rod bolts again. Since my post was closed and this one is allowed to continue... How do you resize rod bolts?
I'm debating on ARP, but there is two different types. Hi-perf & Professional series. Anyone know the difference?
If resizing is too much work I may just go with the Katech's but I can get the ARP's cheap where I work.
I'm debating on ARP, but there is two different types. Hi-perf & Professional series. Anyone know the difference?
If resizing is too much work I may just go with the Katech's but I can get the ARP's cheap where I work.