Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Is it worth the trouble for higher compression

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-05-2008, 03:05 AM
  #1  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
1slowcar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: East Coast
Posts: 188
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default Is it worth the trouble for higher compression

I've been reading about compression and milling the heads and so on. I've read that you shouldn't go below 55cc-56cc after that a lot of things can go wrong. I can't really find a answer to my question.

I have a 5.3 with the stock 7cc dish pistons and would use a .040 gasket, so that would make it like ~ 9.9:1 with 59 CC heads ?(PRC 5.3 stage 2.5) Would it be worth the trouble to mill the heads down to a 55cc-56cc (assume PTV is ok) to make it around 10.5:1 ? Will it make much more power ? Sound better ? (torquer V2 cam) Is there anything else I can do to gain more compression that I've missed?

I used http://www.rbracing-rsr.com/compstaticcalc.html

B 3.78
S 3.66
Gs .040
DH .008
PV +7cc
CC 59 / 56 / 55
Old 09-05-2008, 03:30 AM
  #2  
On The Tree
 
PowerTalk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Over the rainbow
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Interesting thread

Im thinking of doing similar with my 346ci with stock 853 heads.
Would it be worth milling the heads by XXX thou and fitting .040" cometics when I drop my baby cam (224ish ), LS6 intake and valve springs in.

Can't wait to hear some opinions so here's the free bump
Old 09-05-2008, 11:15 PM
  #3  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
1slowcar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: East Coast
Posts: 188
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by PowerTalk
Interesting thread

Im thinking of doing similar with my 346ci with stock 853 heads.
Would it be worth milling the heads by XXX thou and fitting .040" cometics when I drop my baby cam (224ish ), LS6 intake and valve springs in.

Can't wait to hear some opinions so here's the free bump

me too ...
Old 09-05-2008, 11:24 PM
  #4  
TECH Junkie
 
1989GTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 3,092
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Not being an LS1 man I can see one posible problem with milling to much. That would be the intake manifold would not line up correctly with the heads. On a regular SBC you could just mill the intake manifold to match the heads. I don't think you can do that with the LS1 style intake. So I think you would be limited in how much you can mill or you will get into trouble as you stated.
Old 09-05-2008, 11:48 PM
  #5  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
1slowcar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: East Coast
Posts: 188
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I've read on here that with 55cc the FAST intake fit fine, but it was close
Old 09-05-2008, 11:57 PM
  #6  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (3)
 
mchdg86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Tulsa OK
Posts: 514
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Sorry for the hijack but I had a 224 on a 112 LSA and it loved 11-1 compression. Put down 400rwhp through a locked auto with TSP 2.5 5.3 heads. But to the OP yes it helps a good bit raising the compression expecially with a bigger cam.

Originally Posted by PowerTalk
Interesting thread

Im thinking of doing similar with my 346ci with stock 853 heads.
Would it be worth milling the heads by XXX thou and fitting .040" cometics when I drop my baby cam (224ish ), LS6 intake and valve springs in.

Can't wait to hear some opinions so here's the free bump
Old 09-06-2008, 12:01 AM
  #7  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (4)
 
Soul TKR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 3,543
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

with my 59cc AFR 205 heads and a 224 cam... my ratio is right around 11.2:1 and the car absolutely LOVES it... I wouldn't be afraid of it... but I'm sure there's a limit. I'm completely satisfied with it and have NO regrets...
Old 09-06-2008, 03:27 PM
  #8  
Staging Lane
 
th41427's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Prosperity SC
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool My setup

I have the TSP stage 2.5 5.3l heads milled down to 59cc with a TSP233/239 on a 112LSA. Supposively my compression is about 11.1-11.2 but i am not quite sure. when my engine builder checked the heads he said they were actually 57cc. i dont know for sure and i am not taking them off toget checked it runs great. so far as milling the intake down i DID have to because the guide pins were hitting the outside edge of the line up holes on the heads. TSP said i shouldnt have had to but i DID. ohh well it wasnt that hard i just was a little skeptical about doing this to a brand new intake. so have fun with the higher compression still waiting on getting mine tuned as well. i am also doing the two foot drive. haha good luck
Old 09-06-2008, 11:18 PM
  #9  
LS1Tech Premium Sponsor
iTrader: (4)
 
Jason 98 TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Texas!
Posts: 4,229
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Compression is a huge helper in making big power. Our dyno testing showed most of the heads we compared that were out of the box were for the most part seperated by the compression differences. We had a small runner 66cc head make 522hp, while our 5.3l 2.5head with 62.5cc make 533hp & our new prototype casting made something like 539hp with 61.5cc chambers.

Milling 6cc of a head made nearly 20hp in our testing.
__________________
Jason
Co-Owner, Texas Speed & Performance, Ltd.
2005 Twin Turbo C6
404cid Stroker, 67mm Twins
994rwhp/902lb ft @ 22 psi (mustang dyno) www.Texas-Speed.com
Old 09-07-2008, 06:41 AM
  #10  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (2)
 
AINT SKEERED's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Albany La
Posts: 3,985
Received 350 Likes on 239 Posts

Default

My 5.3's are milled to a 54 cc chamber. My intake bolted right up too.

I have 4cc mahle flat tops with reliefs and my compression still calculates to 11.73 with a .051 gasket. My stock lq4 would have been 11.63 if I had used these heads on that motor which is in my trans am.
my 347 is useing the 54 cc heads and going in my Nova.

My Trans am now has a lq4 with 241 casting heads milled to 63 cc chambers and my compression is 10.43/1 . This along with an f14 cam feels pretty strong but dont have new dyno numbers. I street tuned it but have not had time to take it to Thunder and see what is left with a little more timing yet.
Old 09-07-2008, 03:38 PM
  #11  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
1slowcar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: East Coast
Posts: 188
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Well 54cc would give me 10.63 (so the calc says) I've read that going smaller than a .040 heads gasket is not a good idea because of the quench.
Old 09-07-2008, 05:57 PM
  #12  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (2)
 
AINT SKEERED's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Albany La
Posts: 3,985
Received 350 Likes on 239 Posts

Default

you are showing .008 for deck height, if it sticks outthe block like most ls1's it should be -.008 . that will change it to 10.95 with a 54 cc or 10.81 wtih a 55 cc.

also the stroke is 3.622 not 3.66
Old 09-07-2008, 07:32 PM
  #13  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
1slowcar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: East Coast
Posts: 188
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by AINT SKEERED
you are showing .008 for deck height, if it sticks outthe block like most ls1's it should be -.008 . that will change it to 10.95 with a 54 cc or 10.81 wtih a 55 cc.

also the stroke is 3.622 not 3.66
I'm just going to go measure it here in a min while I'm thinking about it I forgot to put a -

I converted mm to inch is how I ended up with 3.622.


edit: I'll have to measure it later I forgot the motor is upside down I haven't put the main caps back on yet

Last edited by 1slowcar; 09-07-2008 at 08:42 PM.
Old 09-07-2008, 08:57 PM
  #14  
On The Tree
 
PowerTalk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Over the rainbow
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

So if I fit 0.040" gaskets to my standard block and 853 heads what CR does that put me at?

What would taking an extra 0.020" off put me at as well?

or even more...
Old 09-07-2008, 10:07 PM
  #15  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (2)
 
AINT SKEERED's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Albany La
Posts: 3,985
Received 350 Likes on 239 Posts

Default

not sure on the 853 heads, are they 5.3 or 5.7 heads? What engine are you putting these on?

give me some specs
Old 09-07-2008, 10:17 PM
  #16  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (2)
 
AINT SKEERED's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Albany La
Posts: 3,985
Received 350 Likes on 239 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by PowerTalk
Interesting thread

Im thinking of doing similar with my 346ci with stock 853 heads.
Would it be worth milling the heads by XXX thou and fitting .040" cometics when I drop my baby cam (224ish ), LS6 intake and valve springs in.

Can't wait to hear some opinions so here's the free bump
went back and found this post.

with stock unmilled heads you would see 10.68 with a .040 gasket. if you mill 2 cc's off which is about .012 , you would be at 10.95/1
and if your cam is 112lsa with a 108 cl you would have a dcr or 8.66/1

with that cam on a 110 icl it would be about 8.52 which would be better for pump gas. either way you would make good power.
Old 09-08-2008, 07:32 AM
  #17  
On The Tree
 
PowerTalk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Over the rainbow
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks buddy. Thats some great info.

I appreciate it
Old 09-08-2008, 08:22 AM
  #18  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (2)
 
AINT SKEERED's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Albany La
Posts: 3,985
Received 350 Likes on 239 Posts

Default

no problem. good luck with your set up



Quick Reply: Is it worth the trouble for higher compression



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:22 AM.