Anybody running titanium valves on a set of 243's on a DD ?
#1
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Chicago Il
Posts: 644
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Anybody running titanium valves on a set of 243's on a DD ?
Looking to run this setup and need some input. Have been hearing horrible things so kinda having second thoughts.
#2
TECH Fanatic
If you are building a DD, why the Ti valves?
#3
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Chicago Il
Posts: 644
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Jus looking to free up some weight and speed up the revs. And well got a good deal on the set so was trying to have them put in while I was having the head work done but the people who are doing the head work are telling me its not worth it because I need copper valve guides and copper beryilium seats and to get them install and everything its gunna get expensive . And that I was better off with LS3 valves .
#4
TECH Fanatic
Jus looking to free up some weight and speed up the revs. And well got a good deal on the set so was trying to have them put in while I was having the head work done but the people who are doing the head work are telling me its not worth it because I need copper valve guides and copper beryilium seats and to get them install and everything its gunna get expensive . And that I was better off with LS3 valves .
Before I made a decision I would look at OEM LS7 heads for valveguide and valve seat material.
Your head shop probably meant bronze guides. How many Ti valved LS heads have they done?
Not sure what you mean by "speed up the revs". Lighter valves, when combined with the correct valvetrain parts will allow higher maximum rpm while maintaining valvetrain control, but they really don't help the engine accelerate faster.
Check the weight of a Ti intake vs. an OEM LS3 (hollow) vs. an L92 truck intake. Ti is definitely lighter, but unless you engine is pulling well above 7000 there are better things to do with your money.
Some head shops are just that...they are not valvetrain experts. Evidence of that is some of the valve, spring and retainer combinations they put on their heads.
Good valvetrain design should be part of your engine's plan. Sadly, many times it is not.
Jon
#9
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: NJ
Posts: 374
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Of course GM intends the ls7 to be a street motor. That's why they coat the titanium valves in the ls7 heads.
#10
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Chicago Il
Posts: 644
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Fbody- Yea that's what I'm saying ,everyone is saying you need CuBe seats and bronze valve guides to make this even remotely possible. And I'm not trying to go that high if anything right around 6500 .
#11
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Chicago Il
Posts: 644
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
SStroker- Yea your right kinda hard making decisions because I'm not to familiar with the LS7 heads at all and from all the research that I've done looks like they ran titanium valves with regular plain jane seats. So from what I see I should be fine but every one else(the shops that I called) call me a witch! Lol they say that that's not gunna work without bronze valve guides and CuBe seats , Sorry I was in a rush before and wrote copper.
But either way the shop I called says I'm better off running the LS3 valves, never even looked at the L92 valves, but know the valves I got weigh 71 grams idk how the compare to the rest. And true about the valvetrain combos. Most people lead me in the Dual spring combos which I wasn't a fan of but I think I'm gunna give it a try. And as for the decision, I got a good deal on the valves so figured I'd see if I could work with it or if not go a different route.
But either way the shop I called says I'm better off running the LS3 valves, never even looked at the L92 valves, but know the valves I got weigh 71 grams idk how the compare to the rest. And true about the valvetrain combos. Most people lead me in the Dual spring combos which I wasn't a fan of but I think I'm gunna give it a try. And as for the decision, I got a good deal on the valves so figured I'd see if I could work with it or if not go a different route.
#12
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Pasadena Texas
Posts: 1,318
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What Jon said. I looked into runnning Ti valves but they have issues with parts compatability. I went with the REV valves for an LS3 they are a better part for the money. Imop. Check and see if they have aset for the 243 heads.
#13
TECH Resident
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: West Palm Beach fl usa
Posts: 934
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Before I made a decision I would look at OEM LS7 heads for valveguide and valve seat material.
Your head shop probably meant bronze guides. How many Ti valved LS heads have they done?
Not sure what you mean by "speed up the revs". Lighter valves, when combined with the correct valvetrain parts will allow higher maximum rpm while maintaining valvetrain control, but they really don't help the engine accelerate faster.
Check the weight of a Ti intake vs. an OEM LS3 (hollow) vs. an L92 truck intake. Ti is definitely lighter, but unless you engine is pulling well above 7000 there are better things to do with your money.
Some head shops are just that...they are not valvetrain experts. Evidence of that is some of the valve, spring and retainer combinations they put on their heads.
Good valvetrain design should be part of your engine's plan. Sadly, many times it is not.
Jon
Your head shop probably meant bronze guides. How many Ti valved LS heads have they done?
Not sure what you mean by "speed up the revs". Lighter valves, when combined with the correct valvetrain parts will allow higher maximum rpm while maintaining valvetrain control, but they really don't help the engine accelerate faster.
Check the weight of a Ti intake vs. an OEM LS3 (hollow) vs. an L92 truck intake. Ti is definitely lighter, but unless you engine is pulling well above 7000 there are better things to do with your money.
Some head shops are just that...they are not valvetrain experts. Evidence of that is some of the valve, spring and retainer combinations they put on their heads.
Good valvetrain design should be part of your engine's plan. Sadly, many times it is not.
Jon
Have you expressly omitted to mention the rockers, the pushrods, the lifters, and the lobe design when you write about valvetrain expert?
Christian
#14
TECH Fanatic
My "correct valvetrain parts" comment broadly hinted at this. You are most correct: valvetrain stability starts with the lobe design and includes all of the bits. One weak link in the valvetrain chain will "screw the pooch". Too many valvetrains have more than one weak link.
I believe you have experienced valvetrain woes that were corrected when the correct parts were used.
Regards,
Jon
#15
TECH Resident
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: West Palm Beach fl usa
Posts: 934
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Christian,
My "correct valvetrain parts" comment broadly hinted at this. You are most correct: valvetrain stability starts with the lobe design and includes all of the bits. One weak link in the valvetrain chain will "screw the pooch". Too many valvetrains have more than one weak link.
I believe you have experienced valvetrain woes that were corrected when the correct parts were used.
Regards,
Jon
My "correct valvetrain parts" comment broadly hinted at this. You are most correct: valvetrain stability starts with the lobe design and includes all of the bits. One weak link in the valvetrain chain will "screw the pooch". Too many valvetrains have more than one weak link.
I believe you have experienced valvetrain woes that were corrected when the correct parts were used.
Regards,
Jon
I didn't know you could replace "costly nightmares" by "woes"!!!
Christian