Generation IV Internal Engine 2005-2014 LS2 | LS3 | LS7 | L92 | LS9

afr vs. etp

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-06-2006, 08:04 PM
  #1  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
MyWs62FaST4u's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: strong island, NY
Posts: 750
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default afr vs. etp

which head do you guys recommend for my build, a 91mm turbo 418cid LS2...

etp 235 or afr 225???
Old 04-06-2006, 08:27 PM
  #2  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (16)
 
mr2guru's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Kansas City Area
Posts: 855
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Dart.... save your money if you are going boosted.
Old 04-06-2006, 08:50 PM
  #3  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
MyWs62FaST4u's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: strong island, NY
Posts: 750
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

really?
Old 04-06-2006, 08:56 PM
  #4  
On The Tree
 
uberLS-1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mr2guru
Dart.... save your money if you are going boosted.

I don't get it, you just suggested the least proven of all three? Why, got some hidden results somewhere?
Old 04-07-2006, 02:00 AM
  #5  
Banned
iTrader: (6)
 
stang90gt50's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: CA
Posts: 271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I agree...just save some money and go with some Dart 225's...youll be fine up to 1000-1200hp before you will need to be concerned with more head flow.
Old 04-07-2006, 03:41 AM
  #6  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (16)
 
mr2guru's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Kansas City Area
Posts: 855
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by uberLS-1
I don't get it, you just suggested the least proven of all three? Why, got some hidden results somewhere?
When you're not 'pulling' air into the engine anymore (boosted) head flow characteristics and intake characteristics become less of a concern. As for heads, what you need to look for is port volume and valve sizing. Let the turbo/supercharger and cam do the work. These expensive heads focus on port velocity to get killer flow numbers with smaller ports. Something that makes an NA engine really shine. But it's $$$.

For an all out NA typ app. then yes go with a head that has the last Nth of tricks up its sleeve to 'entice' the air into the engine.

There are plenty of turbo cars with just ported/valved 6L heads putting down >800whp. Save your money.
Old 04-07-2006, 04:40 AM
  #7  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (5)
 
LSs1Power's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: VA
Posts: 2,320
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

How much are the Darts 225cc heads?
Old 04-07-2006, 08:24 AM
  #8  
6600 rpm clutch dump of death Administrator
 
J-Rod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Texas
Posts: 4,983
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by mr2guru
When you're not 'pulling' air into the engine anymore (boosted) head flow characteristics and intake characteristics become less of a concern. As for heads, what you need to look for is port volume and valve sizing. Let the turbo/supercharger and cam do the work. These expensive heads focus on port velocity to get killer flow numbers with smaller ports. Something that makes an NA engine really shine. But it's $$$.

For an all out NA typ app. then yes go with a head that has the last Nth of tricks up its sleeve to 'entice' the air into the engine.

There are plenty of turbo cars with just ported/valved 6L heads putting down >800whp. Save your money.
Good flowing heads don't care if they are N/A or F/I. Boost is a measurement of restriction. A better flowing head will make power at a lower boost level than a restrictive set of heads. Yes, a power adder is a crutch, but it is not a cure to poor flowing heads.

In fact power gains will be higher with better heads on an F/I setup than a N/A setup.
Old 04-07-2006, 01:54 PM
  #9  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (16)
 
mr2guru's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Kansas City Area
Posts: 855
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by J-Rod
Good flowing heads don't care if they are N/A or F/I. Boost is a measurement of restriction. A better flowing head will make power at a lower boost level than a restrictive set of heads. Yes, a power adder is a crutch, but it is not a cure to poor flowing heads.

In fact power gains will be higher with better heads on an F/I setup than a N/A setup.

The power adder is a 'crutch' that would've made christopher reeves a sprinter.

An additional 2psi will/would surpass any gains made by trick heads.

If you going MAX effort....buy the expensive heads. But when you break down cost/benefit/other alternatives in an FI situation. It just doesn't make sense.
Old 04-07-2006, 02:01 PM
  #10  
6600 rpm clutch dump of death Administrator
 
J-Rod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Texas
Posts: 4,983
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

Case in point. People mistaken believe they don't have to worry about head flow as boost will fix everything. I'll use a Buick GN as an example. You take a motor with a 109 block and the stock iron heads. Lets say as an example the car runs 10.0 at 28lbs of boost. Now you swap it out for a Stage II motor. It'll only take 10 psi to run the same ET.
Old 04-07-2006, 02:43 PM
  #11  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (7)
 
crb99ws6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Abilene, Texas
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

The deck is alot thicker on the etp also.
Old 04-08-2006, 02:27 AM
  #12  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (16)
 
mr2guru's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Kansas City Area
Posts: 855
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by J-Rod
Case in point. People mistaken believe they don't have to worry about head flow as boost will fix everything. I'll use a Buick GN as an example. You take a motor with a 109 block and the stock iron heads. Lets say as an example the car runs 10.0 at 28lbs of boost. Now you swap it out for a Stage II motor. It'll only take 10 psi to run the same ET.

I am sure the stock iron heads flow like dog poop too without much runner volume.

NA:
310cfm and a 240cc runner (average for ported stockers) isn't as impressive and doesn't put down the midrange or even peak like an AFR 205 that runs the same flow with a 205cc runner. The ported stocker is cheap, the AFR is expensive. For NA you want port velocity.

Boost:
That same 240cc runner that flows 310cfm would probably do better than the small runner AFR with the same flow. Velocity is moot when boosted, your backing the air up against the valve anyway.

This is why I said go with the darts. They are cheap, they have a few tricks like raised floors, thicker decks, etc..... They are perfect for boost.

I am just trying to help the guy out. It's his money and when the questions are asked "which one should I buy?" Of course, most will say the most expensive....it's not their money. But the cost/benefit value of uber expensive heads go WAY down when boosted. This has been proven over and over.

I'm done here... were going in circles.
Old 04-08-2006, 04:00 AM
  #13  
Banned
iTrader: (1)
 
Nate_Taufer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: North of Seattle
Posts: 2,057
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mr2guru
They are perfect for boost.
With a 62cc chamber? I think not.

But seriously, why run two more pounds of boost when you're just increasing IAT's? AFR's and ETP's are both proven heads. I would go with the ETP's if you can find someone with a set in stock. Otherwise go AFR's.

Nate
Old 04-08-2006, 02:01 PM
  #14  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
MyWs62FaST4u's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: strong island, NY
Posts: 750
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

thanks guys, and thanks nate...since u are in my path already having experience with 418cid..LS2
Old 04-15-2006, 04:44 PM
  #15  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
mdhmi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Detroit, MI
Posts: 1,119
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by Nate_Taufer
With a 62cc chamber? I think not.
Means nothing. Set your CR via pistons.

Mark
Old 04-16-2006, 06:22 PM
  #16  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (41)
 
Firehawk441's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 2,119
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

Use the ALL PRO heads. Wheel to Wheel seems to have had great results with them.
Old 04-16-2006, 10:03 PM
  #17  
Banned
iTrader: (23)
 
JZ'sTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Ft. Myers Fl
Posts: 3,126
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

ETP 245's.
Old 04-16-2006, 10:23 PM
  #18  
FormerVendor
iTrader: (10)
 
427 LS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 206
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I have a sweet set of All Pro's that are turbo ready I'm going to sell. They haven't been run. Flow 332 CFM/248 cfm, have 2.08/1.60 Ferrea valves(Super Alloy high temp exhaust valves), Berillium Copper exhaust seats and Cryo'ed Patriot dual golds. Let me know if you are interested. Thanks
Old 04-16-2006, 10:25 PM
  #19  
Banned
iTrader: (1)
 
Nate_Taufer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: North of Seattle
Posts: 2,057
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mdhmi
Means nothing. Set your CR via pistons.

Mark
The more material you take out of your piston just compromises piston strength. Also the mixture will burn slower in the chamber in big dish pistons.

Nate
Old 04-17-2006, 07:56 AM
  #20  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (4)
 
Wet 1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 972
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Why is it you guys keep saying the Darts have a thicker deck... they have a 1/2" deck (.500").

Also the 62cc chamber is crap for FI. Mark, stick to what you know... IT. If you can avoid it, you never want to use a small chamber head and remove material out of the pistons to regain proper CR with FI. Pistons tend to be the weak link with FI to begin with, why make them weaker? Plus, to get the CR back to where you'd likely want it to be, you might be looking at having to use custom pistons to get you there with the 62cc heads... which cost $$$. And as Nate stated, burn rate is also effected. Stick to 70+cc chambers.

I'd also suggest you go with the larger runners rather than the smaller ones you've listed. This is a big inch FI engine engine so go with 240+cc heads. As stated, port velocity isn't a concern with FI so bigger is better (up to a point).


My 2 cents.


Quick Reply: afr vs. etp



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:32 PM.