Generation IV Internal Engine 2005-2014 LS2 | LS3 | LS7 | L92 | LS9

L92 vs. LS2 v. LQ9 (500rwhp DD)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-01-2007, 04:14 PM
  #1  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
Cerberus's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Up the Bayou
Posts: 154
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default L92 vs. LS2 v. LQ9 (500rwhp DD)

Are there any advantages/disadvantages that one of these setups has over another in terms of making at least 500rwhp through an A4 daily driver?

1. 418 L92 block, L92 heads, L76 intake
2. 402 LS2, L92 heads, L76 intake
3. 408 LQ9, AFR 225s, ported FAST 90/90

Obviously cam choice has a lot to do with it and there is still testing going on with the L92s but I wanted on some preliminary opinions on what set up is better suited for my application. I've looked through the dyno section and see M6's clearing the 500 mark with 408s but not too many A4s with the L92 setup.
Old 03-01-2007, 04:36 PM
  #2  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (1)
 
beardWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Lake Jackson,TX
Posts: 2,879
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Numbers in sig! 408 with ET heads! Ported fast didn`t hang with me. Chokes the motor down!
Old 03-01-2007, 04:53 PM
  #3  
FormerVendor
iTrader: (13)
 
Brian Tooley Racing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Bardstown, KY
Posts: 1,943
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

A TFS/ET/AFR head with a Fast 90 is going to make more power then a L92...

Seems like Vengeance just posted a 402 M6 mail order combo that made almost 550 RWHP, so over 500 RWHP with a A4 should be easy.

https://ls1tech.com/forums/dynamometer-results-comparisons/667223-vengeance-racing-402-iron-block-tfs-heads-results-inside.html
Old 03-01-2007, 05:09 PM
  #4  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (1)
 
beardWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Lake Jackson,TX
Posts: 2,879
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Its not easy making over 500rwhp with auto. Seems differant autos eat rwhp differant. I found this out pretty quick!
Old 03-01-2007, 05:46 PM
  #5  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
Cerberus's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Up the Bayou
Posts: 154
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by beardWS6
Numbers in sig! 408 with ET heads! Ported fast didn`t hang with me. Chokes the motor down!
Nice! How's it drive around town and such?
Old 03-01-2007, 05:59 PM
  #6  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
Cerberus's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Up the Bayou
Posts: 154
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Brian Tooley
A TFS/ET/AFR head with a Fast 90 is going to make more power then a L92...

Seems like Vengeance just posted a 402 M6 mail order combo that made almost 550 RWHP, so over 500 RWHP with a A4 should be easy.

https://ls1tech.com/forums/showthread.php?t=667223
That's very encouraging. It looks like cathedral port heads are still the way to go for now.

So, at this point I guess I am crossing the FAST 90 off my list if they are that restrictive.
Old 03-01-2007, 06:15 PM
  #7  
FormerVendor
iTrader: (13)
 
Brian Tooley Racing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Bardstown, KY
Posts: 1,943
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Cerberus
That's very encouraging. It looks like cathedral port heads are still the way to go for now.

So, at this point I guess I am crossing the FAST 90 off my list if they are that restrictive.
I think the Fast intake is very good for a DD.

What intake would you run instead?

You know Vengeance also had a stock shortblock 5.7 engine with a killer set of LS6 heads, Fast intake and their cam make 480 RWHP...so over 500 RWHP with a 402/TFS 225/Fast 90 is easy.
Old 03-01-2007, 06:32 PM
  #8  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
Cerberus's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Up the Bayou
Posts: 154
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Brian Tooley
I think the Fast intake is very good for a DD.

What intake would you run instead?

You know Vengeance also had a stock shortblock 5.7 engine with a killer set of LS6 heads, Fast intake and their cam make 480 RWHP...so over 500 RWHP with a 402/TFS 225/Fast 90 is easy.

I guess if a Fast 90 setup gets my goal then it shouldn't matter. I just don't like knowing there is more left on the table.

Maybe one of those nice sheet metal intakes with ceramic coating if my wallet really needed to lose weight.



Quick Reply: L92 vs. LS2 v. LQ9 (500rwhp DD)



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:14 AM.