Introductions & Greetings New to the site? Say hello!

15.2 in a modded 5.o

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-17-2006, 07:59 PM
  #1  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
fastman5.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default 15.2 in a modded 5.o

think i might go for ls1 now
Old 12-17-2006, 10:14 PM
  #2  
Launching!
 
boostedbuford's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 236
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

=do it
Old 12-17-2006, 10:38 PM
  #3  
TECH Resident
 
jamesSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Racine, WI
Posts: 872
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

yep, you will never look back.
Old 12-17-2006, 10:56 PM
  #4  
Banned
 
TransAminal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 282
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

What mods do you have and is it auto or 5-speed??

A 5-speed with full bolt ons should be in the mid 14's at least...

Maybe somethings wrong with your car.
Old 12-17-2006, 11:04 PM
  #5  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
desertLS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 2,277
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

you;ll have to change your name to fastman5.7!
Old 12-17-2006, 11:36 PM
  #6  
Banned
 
BLKWS.6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,636
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Do it, I ran a 14.3@97.84 w/2.15 60' in my 5.0 with:

Crate motor with GT40P's, X303 cam, shorties,Xpipe,catback,670carb, full MSD ign. 6AL, tko500 5-speed, 4.10's, pullies,rpm manifold, 1.6rr's

N/A 2 valveMustangs under 408ci are just ****. Period. Go LS1 !!! (or Cobra or Mach1).
Old 12-17-2006, 11:39 PM
  #7  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (9)
 
blake110106's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Bremen, Ky
Posts: 429
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TransAminal
What mods do you have and is it auto or 5-speed??

A 5-speed with full bolt ons should be in the mid 14's at least...

Maybe somethings wrong with your car.
more like high 13's. ive owned a 5.0 with 306, 5spd, 4:10, UD pulleys, smog delete, and full exhaust and i pulled 14.5@91 with a 2.23 60' with 4th jumping in and out so i shifted to 5th . i could have pulled 13's out of the car. with the 4:10's and the tremec 3550 i could go from a dig but from a roll it was mean.

something is seriously wrong with ur car or ur driving. its one or the other. It's not the car that makes the driver, its the driver that makes the car!!

an 87-93 5.0 hatch 5spd with full suspension mods and full bolt ons and DR will dig into the 12's
Old 12-17-2006, 11:49 PM
  #8  
On The Tree
 
88MONTESS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Washington
Posts: 189
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Maybe he is racing at a high elevation track?
Old 12-17-2006, 11:53 PM
  #9  
Banned
 
BLKWS.6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,636
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

My times were sealevel. I made 244/262 on the dyno. Mustangs are ****.
Old 12-17-2006, 11:54 PM
  #10  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (9)
 
blake110106's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Bremen, Ky
Posts: 429
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BLKWS.6
Do it, I ran a 14.3@97.84 w/2.15 60' in my 5.0 with:

Crate motor with GT40P's, X303 cam, shorties,Xpipe,catback,670carb, full MSD ign. 6AL, tko500 5-speed, 4.10's, pullies,rpm manifold, 1.6rr's

N/A 2 valveMustangs under 408ci are just ****. Period. Go LS1 !!! (or Cobra or Mach1).
as in crate u mean a stock 302 with crapy explorer heads, huge cam, and a great intake. the heads and that cam isnt that great of a combo for a 302
i would say if u would of went with GT40's not the p's and a E303 or F303 cam u would would have been more pleased(dont mean to sound like an ***)

I dont compare a LT1/LS1 car to a 5.0 there is a big diff there. ford does better with small CI's and GM is better with big CI's.
Old 12-18-2006, 12:00 AM
  #11  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (9)
 
blake110106's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Bremen, Ky
Posts: 429
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BLKWS.6
My times were sealevel. I made 244/262 on the dyno. Mustangs are ****.
damn the stuff on mine listed above pulled 212/265 w/ an a/f ratio of 11.3:1 around 95 dedrees. guy at the dyno said he could adjust the A/F and get about 5-10 more out of it but i didnt have th money with me. i got 4 pulls for $20 cause i went with my buddy on here. It was at Horsepower House in BG, kentucky. my buddy is Briancws6 on here.
Old 12-18-2006, 09:52 PM
  #12  
TECH Fanatic
 
Darth Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Houma, LA
Posts: 1,755
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Welcome.
Old 12-19-2006, 09:17 AM
  #13  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (2)
 
SilverStang00's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Georgia
Posts: 350
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BLKWS.6
My times were sealevel. I made 244/262 on the dyno. Mustangs are ****.
Easy man, damn LOL. I agree that his time is slow, but so was yours. I'm not going to bash your old car( even tho you do LOL) but just because you had a bad experience with your car does not make all Mustangs ****. I read some of your old posts under your old name and you had alot of diff. issues with that car, and that would make anybody resent it. They are not equal to LS1s stock, or even lightly modded, but they are a different kind of car, and even NA 2 valves can be made hella fast. There are several NA stock internal 2 valve GTs in my area that can take a stock LS1, maybe even a light bolt-on car. There are even more Fox bodys, although they usually have a cam atleast. It takes more money than with an LSX engine, but once the aftermarket comes into play, all bets are off. And who knows his idea of a "modded 5.0" could be exhaust, in which case that time would be about right.
Old 12-19-2006, 09:22 AM
  #14  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (2)
 
SilverStang00's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Georgia
Posts: 350
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by blake110106
as in crate u mean a stock 302 with crapy explorer heads, huge cam, and a great intake. the heads and that cam isnt that great of a combo for a 302
i would say if u would of went with GT40's not the p's and a E303 or F303 cam u would would have been more pleased(dont mean to sound like an ***)

I dont compare a LT1/LS1 car to a 5.0 there is a big diff there. ford does better with small CI's and GM is better with big CI's.
I agree, it seems that BLKWS.6's Mustang had kind of a weird matching of parts. With better heads, a different cam and 3.55s/3.73s with good tires he would have had a much better '60 and 1/4 time.
Old 12-19-2006, 01:06 PM
  #15  
Teching In
 
Untamed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

That sucks, my single port 3.8 can do better than that! There must be something wrong with your car.
Old 12-19-2006, 01:19 PM
  #16  
Teching In
 
Untamed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Untamed
That sucks, my single port 3.8 can do better than that! There must be something wrong with your car.
Well not better, but about the same.
Old 12-19-2006, 01:22 PM
  #17  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (2)
 
v8hunter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Eugene, Oregon
Posts: 386
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

My lifted 4x4 toyota pickup with bigger tires can beat that. Don't take me too seriously I'm just giving you crap...welcome to ls1tech.

When I was young and not so bright I had several 14 and 15 second cars (mustang, shelby charger turbo, probe gt, 3.5 maxima, v6 accord, my truck) that I wasted money on and thought they were fast...it really opened up my eyes when I rode in my buddies 11 second car about 10 years back. Now I look at cars differently:

16 second car...average family car

14 second car...starting to get entertaining

12 second car...man this kicks a$$

10 second car...scary fast (does this even belong on the street)



Originally Posted by fastman5.0
think i might go for ls1 now
Old 12-19-2006, 01:41 PM
  #18  
TECH Fanatic
 
Hot94Z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Lexington,MO
Posts: 1,230
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Welcome
Old 12-19-2006, 01:44 PM
  #19  
TECH Junkie
 
slick1851's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: CHITOWN
Posts: 3,265
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

sounds like the car is just tired......Foxes are awsome cars
Old 12-19-2006, 01:47 PM
  #20  
TECH Junkie
 
slick1851's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: CHITOWN
Posts: 3,265
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by BLKWS.6
Do it, I ran a 14.3@97.84 w/2.15 60' in my 5.0 with:

Crate motor with GT40P's, X303 cam, shorties,Xpipe,catback,670carb, full MSD ign. 6AL, tko500 5-speed, 4.10's, pullies,rpm manifold, 1.6rr's

N/A 2 valveMustangs under 408ci are just ****. Period. Go LS1 !!! (or Cobra or Mach1).

No there not, your just a sucker and bought all the wrong parts that are horried for those cars!


A nice after market set of heads, and a nice cam and they move out well!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:17 PM.