LT1-LT4 Modifications 1993-97 Gen II Small Block V8

reluctor fabrication

Old Feb 26, 2014 | 12:26 PM
  #41  
Tinbender59's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 301
Likes: 0
Default

first look at initial mock up http://www.flickr.com/photos/tinbender59/12797555294/
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2014 | 07:18 PM
  #42  
Tinbender59's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 301
Likes: 0
Default

first disk is being designed, we will get a prototype built and start extensive controlled testing, hopefully within the next 4 weeks. we will be using my truck as the test bed, as such testing will be light play (I will have to get the wife to do the light testing LOL) to heavy towing; with the new sensor and compaire to same perameters on the current configuration
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2014 | 09:19 PM
  #43  
Tinbender59's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 301
Likes: 0
Default

Blast it anyway, the sensor I purchased has a max temp of 185f. THAT aint gonna work!!!! so back to the resarch. Not to worry, ------ um ------ maybe??? I have found a possablility though, stay tuned. Ol Murphy just had to show up LOL
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2014 | 10:05 PM
  #44  
Tinbender59's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 301
Likes: 0
Default

hi everybody, this is a long way from being over. lol I just have to run scenerios in my pea brain, pick my advisors brains, in order to weed out MOST of the bad ideas, and hopefully find the good ones. As i have stated before I am a board level trained electronics tech, as such I have a theory about the 411, but I need a schematic of the circuite board inside of it. or I will just have to open one up and see if I can decipher it the hard way. if I am corect, this is a done deal. but my track record is some what lacking on this project. but heck, If it were easy efi would have done it this way. EFI I do have the utmost respect for your work in the pionering of the 411, just looking for a cheaper way to do this part.
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2014 | 08:10 PM
  #45  
Tinbender59's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 301
Likes: 0
Default

alrighty then; i picked up a 411 today opened it up and as I suspected. I can mod it to take 5vdc on the cam sensor input, so the 5vdc sensor that I found will work. we are still in the race on this stay tuned. I will put this mod out for everyone to do themselves. If I do it, the cost of the complete mod would get close to the other guys cost and defeet my idea lol

P.S. I am picking the 411 up for $42.xx here locally
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2014 | 09:11 PM
  #46  
mmihm06's Avatar
Teching In
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Default

I appreciate the efforts good work guys. Don't want to step on anybodys toes here, I just want to share. I have a running 24x Lt1, and I said screw the cam signal completely. I made my own crank reluctor and went to town. If you're ok with batch fire injection and a not-hardly-noticeable longer cranking time, it will be just fine and you'll avoid alot of headaches, especially if you're doing it on your own and not going the EFIX route.

Just food for thought...
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2014 | 10:53 PM
  #47  
Tinbender59's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 301
Likes: 0
Default

you are correct. but you do need to keep in mind that most of the people do not have the resources to do what you or I am doing. I built my truck because I was told it would never work. and it did work almost too well. so for now I need a new MIssion Impossable, LOL One of the main reasons to go 411 is to have sequential injection, and all of the benifits of the modern ECU's. If I were going batch fire I'd stay with OBD1 Just my opinion
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2014 | 11:30 AM
  #48  
ccreddell's Avatar
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
From: Medford, OR
Default

Originally Posted by mmihm06
I appreciate the efforts good work guys. Don't want to step on anybodys toes here, I just want to share. I have a running 24x Lt1, and I said screw the cam signal completely. I made my own crank reluctor and went to town. If you're ok with batch fire injection and a not-hardly-noticeable longer cranking time, it will be just fine and you'll avoid alot of headaches, especially if you're doing it on your own and not going the EFIX route.

Just food for thought...
Actually, unless im completely not understanding what you did, youre not running 24x, youre running 4x. But still impressive that youre up and running with a 411. Would love to see pics and maybe a build?
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2014 | 01:11 PM
  #49  
mmihm06's Avatar
Teching In
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Default

No, I'm running a true 24x, with CNP, and no cam signal. Without the cam signal, the PCM has to guess at what stroke cyl 1 is actually on when it's at TDC. It's got a 50/50 shot. And once it figures it out, it delivers spark as usual. I was told that the injectors continue to fire in "batch mode" instead of sequentially, but I'm not sure I take that as gospel, since if the PCM knows TDC and stroke, and can deliver spark on the correct stroke, then it should be be able to deliver fuel accurately as well.

I made my own crank reluctor from an L21 wheel. Just had crank snout adapter machined for the smaller diameter SBC/LT1 snout, relocated the keyway to the correct position, and welded the adapter to the wheel. Then I had my balancer turned down the exact thickness of the adapter to realign my belts.



With the LT1 96/97 timing cover, I had major clearance issues with my wheel, and had to grind the center seal boss down quite a bit. So i had a ring machined and welded to the outside of the cover to "build up" the material that the crank seal presses into. I'm also running an electric water pump, so I welded up the opti and pump drive holes, and called it good.



I guess if you don't have a tig welder/machining tools at your disposal, it would be difficult to do. But I think EFI connections is getting better at selling atleast their crank reluctors individually or as a kit with their timing covers, so that would be a decent route to go if you're trying to do this on a tight dime and don't have machine shop access.
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2014 | 02:22 PM
  #50  
ccreddell's Avatar
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
From: Medford, OR
Default

Cool deal! Hows it run?
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2014 | 02:44 PM
  #51  
mmihm06's Avatar
Teching In
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Default

First start up was successful, we ran it enough to move the car around the shop a little bit and verify that I had the keyway in the right spot. Then the drivetrain came out, got completely torn down, rebuild with all forged components, and put it in my 56000 mile 96 z28. Gonna have a Vortech T-trim hanging off the side of it.

We heard the new combo run for the first time this weekend, with no issues after I got some wiring problems straightened out. A couple part throttle revs sounded promising, very quick throttle response, and it's a stock 02 fbody tune with 60lb injector data thrown in it
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2014 | 03:05 PM
  #52  
smitty2919's Avatar
TECH Addict
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 2,103
Likes: 21
Default

in for results
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2014 | 08:47 PM
  #53  
Tinbender59's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 301
Likes: 0
Default

Wow do I have a headake, spent the last 4 hours sorting out electronics. I have to check with the brainiacks but I think that the ECU is set up for various voltages, as in it can adjust itself to what ever is thrown at it. within raeson of course. but only on 4 input lines, I have to confirm which as of yet. I'll keep you all posted.

sorry if I seem to jump around a lot, just so you know there are several scenarious running around in my pea brain. when I get new information, I apply it to the lot, and start spitting out plausable solutions. If you are having trouble following you ought to be on the inside of all of this confusion LOL

bede bede bede thats all folks lol
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2014 | 10:18 PM
  #54  
Tinbender59's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 301
Likes: 0
Default

found out why I couldn't get the electronics to make sence, the plugs and pinouts are backwards from each other. sheesh, what should be an output going to an input buffer, and what should have been an input going to a driver LOL
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2014 | 11:01 PM
  #55  
Tinbender59's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 301
Likes: 0
Default

new thought

I really am stupid. close off 4 of the 6 low resolution windows, use 2 of them 180 degrees out from each other and use a $2 J/K FlipFlop to switch between hi / low, output to a $10 SCR, frickin simple "several explicit words basicly calling myself a great big moron"" again!!!!




but what if it got lost ??? hum???

ok use 360 windows to give the 2X count, then close off all but 1 window on the low res to reset the counter at crank "0", to high or low state which ever is needed for 1st crank rotation.

any input??

I think I may still go forward with the other system for now, as I think that most want to get away from the OPTI part ???? it is the weak link in the system. an if needed I can use the SCR to step the 5vdc up to 12vdc, which may be the best plan yet, an quit jackin with the 411. sorry "thinking out loud again"

Last edited by Tinbender59; Mar 6, 2014 at 11:08 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2014 | 06:15 PM
  #56  
Tinbender59's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 301
Likes: 0
Default

the current hold up is the designer, wating on prints and stuff to send to the machine shop. this is not dead yet, stay tuned
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2014 | 08:22 AM
  #57  
nitrous2fast's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,084
Likes: 0
From: Oklahoma
Default

I always enjoy reading more on this project!
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2014 | 12:11 AM
  #58  
Tinbender59's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 301
Likes: 0
Default

We are still here just wating If It can be done we will find it ---- maybe LOL
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2014 | 02:38 PM
  #59  
nitrous2fast's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,084
Likes: 0
From: Oklahoma
Default

Ya know that there more applications for this project than just opti delete. A boosted LT could have a decent advantage with the 411 even without removing the opti.
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2014 | 04:30 PM
  #60  
Tinbender59's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 301
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by nitrous2fast
Ya know that there more applications for this project than just opti delete. A boosted LT could have a decent advantage with the 411 even without removing the opti.
i don't think that the 411 will run on an opti??? I may be wrong? but it is my understanding that it cannot be done???
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:54 PM.