Multimedia Exchange Videos | Sound Clips | Photos | Photoshop

2010 Camaro 13.0@110.9

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-03-2009, 11:37 AM
  #41  
11 Second Club
 
camaro98z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Peoria, AZ
Posts: 710
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

WTF are people complaining about? 13.0 @110 isn't bad at all. It's heavy but safe and on a better track will run low 12's. It's still faster that anyones on here Camaro when you were stock. And don't bring up Slick and crap. geeeze
Old 04-03-2009, 05:29 PM
  #42  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (1)
 
Sarge_13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Schertz, Texas
Posts: 2,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by camaro98z28
WTF are people complaining about? 13.0 @110 isn't bad at all. It's heavy but safe and on a better track will run low 12's. It's still faster that anyones on here Camaro when you were stock. And don't bring up Slick and crap. geeeze
You realize there have been bone stock LS1 Fbody's in the 12's right? One of them in a Mustang magazine
Old 04-03-2009, 06:08 PM
  #43  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (7)
 
AznMuscle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Someplace Hot
Posts: 817
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Sarge_13
You realize there have been bone stock LS1 Fbody's in the 12's right? One of them in a Mustang magazine
With a lower trap as well...

I want to see even smith run one of these, and compare it to the 12.9 car he ran.
Old 04-03-2009, 06:19 PM
  #44  
11 Second Club
 
camaro98z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Peoria, AZ
Posts: 710
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Sarge_13
You realize there have been bone stock LS1 Fbody's in the 12's right? One of them in a Mustang magazine
Yes we all know that, but this was one 2010 SS. The MPH is good for a mid 12 sec. I'm just saying that it is still faster than anyone on here stock for stock. Let that SS open up a tad and we'll see some great improvement. I also assume that the 2010 is so restricted. We will see though.
Old 04-03-2009, 08:32 PM
  #45  
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
jbs02somws6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: From Indy now San Diego
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

You guys saying the new Camaro is SOOO ugly are obviously SOOOO jealous you can't afford one. Not that I'm buying one right away even though I can, I just can't believe anyone thinks this car is ugly. Ugly should be reserved for automotive marvels such as the Prius, Aztec, etc.

As far as performance all of us bolt-on 4th gens will be getting embarassed by these "ugly" and heavy butt pigs once most of them have mild bolt-ons and tunes. And 13.0 sec stock rag times really mean 12.6-12.8's once these 5th gens are broken in and are driven with competent drivers. Stock!
Old 04-03-2009, 09:15 PM
  #46  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (10)
 
my bandit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Jacksonville, Fl
Posts: 2,052
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

not bad but the trans am concepts look alot better.
that guy was killing the first slalom though.
do you think he had traction control on?
Old 04-05-2009, 04:27 PM
  #47  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (26)
 
kinglt-1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Ft. Wayne, IN
Posts: 5,794
Received 196 Likes on 138 Posts

Default

I would call it a masterpiece if it were 400lbs lighter. This is part of the reason why the gto fell by the waste side because its a pig. Same will happen to the g8. Why does gm keep producing these fatbastard cars lol?
Old 04-05-2009, 07:30 PM
  #48  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (23)
 
1989k1500's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Ravenna, MI
Posts: 1,857
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by jbs02somws6
You guys saying the new Camaro is SOOO ugly are obviously SOOOO jealous you can't afford one.

Not that I'm buying one right away even though I can
Are you serious?

Your on crack if you think Im jealous of people who buy a 5th gen. They are hideously ugly cars in my opinion, and Im not the only one that feels that way.

OMG you have soooooooo much money, I wish I could be more like you! Ive always dreamed of being a pompous ***! Get off your ******* high horse.

Can I afford to go buy one of these, no. Can I afford to go buy a new Z06, no. Do I think the 2010 Camaro is ugly, yes. Do I think a new Z06 is ugly, not at all. Jealousy, I think not.
Old 04-05-2009, 09:35 PM
  #49  
TECH Apprentice
 
camaro_five0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Erin, TN
Posts: 343
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Jesus, guys. Shut up already. Everyone has their own opinion and they're entitled to it. I've ran into a shitload of people who think our 4th Gen Camaros and Trans-Ams are hideously ugly, so I just let them keep their opinion while I speed past them and let them stare at my car's ugly *** and smell my ugly car's exhaust.
Old 04-05-2009, 09:40 PM
  #50  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (9)
 
OUTLAWZ RACING's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: COLUMBUS GA.
Posts: 2,726
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Is it me but do they have dr's on the back???? look really close
Old 04-05-2009, 10:13 PM
  #51  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (13)
 
98catfish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 416
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by OUTLAWZ RACING
Is it me but do they have dr's on the back???? look really close
Your eyes must have superman vision,All I saw was black!


And for those of you saying that they had or saw or owned 4th gens that ran in the 12s bone stock.....I call bs! not on street tires! and your 4th gen only weighed maybe 3600 w/ a large driver.

So I want to see a bone stock 4th gen w/ a 400# weight in the back on street tires run 12s. Never gonna happen!

Now with that said I am not a fan of the 5th gen, Looks wise. I think the challenger is a much better looking car. But the ls3 is a way better platform than the mopar.

Looks = challenger
Performance = camaro


And gm has a formula they use where power to weight ratio comes into play.
Meaning you are not going to get a rear drive performance car that weighs in less than 4k#s. At least not one w/ over 400hp anyway.


Sorry for the rant

Doug
Old 04-05-2009, 10:19 PM
  #52  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (1)
 
Sarge_13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Schertz, Texas
Posts: 2,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

What the hell are you ranting about? There have been many 12 second LS1 F-body's stock. One was in MM&FF.
Old 04-06-2009, 12:14 AM
  #53  
***Repost Police***
 
Irunelevens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 98catfish
Your eyes must have superman vision,All I saw was black!


And for those of you saying that they had or saw or owned 4th gens that ran in the 12s bone stock.....I call bs! not on street tires! and your 4th gen only weighed maybe 3600 w/ a large driver.

So I want to see a bone stock 4th gen w/ a 400# weight in the back on street tires run 12s. Never gonna happen!

Now with that said I am not a fan of the 5th gen, Looks wise. I think the challenger is a much better looking car. But the ls3 is a way better platform than the mopar.

Looks = challenger
Performance = camaro


And gm has a formula they use where power to weight ratio comes into play.
Meaning you are not going to get a rear drive performance car that weighs in less than 4k#s. At least not one w/ over 400hp anyway.


Sorry for the rant

Doug
Regardless of what you would like to believe, I saw an '02 WS6 run a 12.99 @ 110mph with just SFCs and a whisper lid. On street tires. With a 2.15 60' time.
Old 04-06-2009, 01:05 AM
  #54  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (1)
 
sixpack_2_go's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: bentonville, arkansas
Posts: 778
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

that was the weakest burnout i have ever seen. car tester...that's my dream job!!!!
Old 04-06-2009, 01:39 AM
  #55  
TECH Enthusiast
 
99bowtieZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: NC
Posts: 605
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Y'all act surprised about this new Camaro... This is the NEW GM... The same one that put SS badges on an HHR and a Cobalt... WTF did you expect!? (no disrespect to owners of aforementioned vehicles)

That said ... I really wanted to like this new Camaro but the more I hear and see it the more I wish they had just forgot about it after that damn Transformers movie. It weighs too much, and is too big, and I'm going to go out on a limb and say that the IRS is going to be a weak link.

Sorry for the rant, but they had an opportunity to create a masterpeice and save their own *** but they didn't in my opinion ... k, I'm done.
Old 04-06-2009, 02:52 AM
  #56  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (17)
 
Demonicbird00's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Alloway,NJ
Posts: 2,409
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 98catfish
Your eyes must have superman vision,All I saw was black!


And for those of you saying that they had or saw or owned 4th gens that ran in the 12s bone stock.....I call bs! not on street tires! and your 4th gen only weighed maybe 3600 w/ a large driver.

So I want to see a bone stock 4th gen w/ a 400# weight in the back on street tires run 12s. Never gonna happen!

Now with that said I am not a fan of the 5th gen, Looks wise. I think the challenger is a much better looking car. But the ls3 is a way better platform than the mopar.

Looks = challenger
Performance = camaro


And gm has a formula they use where power to weight ratio comes into play.
Meaning you are not going to get a rear drive performance car that weighs in less than 4k#s. At least not one w/ over 400hp anyway.


Sorry for the rant

Doug
what do you mean about the hp:weight ? they made 3 vettes that are way under the 5th gen hp:lbs

camaro- 4000/422 = 9.47:1
vette- 3200/422 = 7.58:1
z06- 3100/505 = 6.13:1
zr1- 3100/650 = 4.76:1


the 5g is gonna run the the same times as the 03/04 cobras. plus it has 100 more hp and 500-600 lbs more then the 4th gen

coefficent drag of this car is probably .50 which equals a brick on wheels.

no thanks, ill go get the vette for 5k more

as far as GM is concerned, they missed the retro look by about 5 years. this car is a joke. they should have just made a 5th gen look like a 5th gen and not a 1st gen


again heres to the new camaro for failure and looks
you dont see them making a retro vette do you?
Old 04-06-2009, 03:16 AM
  #57  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (17)
 
Demonicbird00's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Alloway,NJ
Posts: 2,409
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by camaro98z28
WTF are people complaining about? 13.0 @110 isn't bad at all. It's heavy but safe and on a better track will run low 12's. It's still faster that anyones on here Camaro when you were stock. And don't bring up Slick and crap. geeeze

maybe you never got the memo....the vettes are 1000 lbs lighter then the camaro and are safe as well
Old 04-06-2009, 04:27 AM
  #58  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
 
corvet786c's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Port St. Lucie, Fl
Posts: 1,410
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

Nice performance numbers, but I am tired of making car payments. I am goin to stick with my 2000 T/A and rebuilt it with a 383 AFR heads Etc.
Old 04-06-2009, 09:24 AM
  #59  
11 Second Club
 
camaro98z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Peoria, AZ
Posts: 710
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Irunelevens
Regardless of what you would like to believe, I saw an '02 WS6 run a 12.99 @ 110mph with just SFCs and a whisper lid. On street tires. With a 2.15 60' time.
Like it or not, it wasn't bone stock and there is no proof of what you've seen. Sorry.
Old 04-06-2009, 09:36 AM
  #60  
11 Second Club
 
camaro98z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Peoria, AZ
Posts: 710
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Sarge_13
What the hell are you ranting about? There have been many 12 second LS1 F-body's stock. One was in MM&FF.
So now we're saying that a 5th gen won't be faster than this one freaking SS? So what are people going to say when one runs 12.4? stock no MODS. Look at the launch, it was horrible and looks like the guy didn't even drive it hard. BTW, I haven't seen more than one 4th gen run 12's Bone *** stock. That means not a damn thing touched. no lid, no exhaust, no nothing and stock factory tires.


Quick Reply: 2010 Camaro 13.0@110.9



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:14 AM.