Multimedia Exchange Videos | Sound Clips | Photos | Photoshop

2010 Camaro 13.0@110.9

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-28-2009 | 10:50 AM
  #1  
NiteRiderWS6's Avatar
Thread Starter
Teching In
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
From: Socal
Default 2010 Camaro 13.0@110.9

check this out

http://videos.streetfire.net/video/C...-It_642342.htm
Old 03-28-2009 | 05:19 PM
  #2  
grandsport1963's Avatar
Staging Lane

iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
From: MOYOCK NC 27958
Default

thats sad!!! glad i still have my 2000 SS
Old 03-29-2009 | 12:40 AM
  #3  
ssscottss's Avatar
Teching In
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Default

I didn't think that was sad at all. I think it's pretty respectable. For approximately the same price as a decked out Mustang GT and almost a full second quicker at a few tenths quicker then the Challenger.

A 2002 SS was rated to be around 13.4 or 13.5 was is not? I see it as a newer car which is quicker and for almost the same price they sold for 7 years ago.

Of course there's room for improvement, and I'm more then confident that plenty of members on this very site will show us just what this car is capable of.

It does need some wider shoes though

Last edited by ssscottss; 03-29-2009 at 03:02 AM.
Old 03-29-2009 | 07:49 AM
  #4  
87silverbullet's Avatar
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 4,873
Likes: 8
From: Slidell,LA
Default

Put something sticky on the back and it is automatically in the 12's. I/E and some bolt-ons and it should be a low 12 sec, hell a high 11 sec monster with out even going in the motor.
Old 03-29-2009 | 08:06 AM
  #5  
99_Z28's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 333
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by grandsport1963
thats sad!!! glad i still have my 2000 SS




Those times were recorded on a ice rink...get that car on the track with a real driver it it will be high 12's easy. Minor mods to uncork the motor will be mid low 12's. Sad my ***, the car has alot of potential.
Old 03-29-2009 | 08:13 AM
  #6  
unit213's Avatar
Administrator

 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 45,841
Likes: 5
From: Earth
Default

I would buy one if it weighed 3,600lbs or less. Throw a little D1 on it and it would be a nice street car.
Old 03-29-2009 | 08:24 AM
  #7  
MonmouthCtyLS7's Avatar
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,955
Likes: 30
From: Rotonda West Florida
Default

Yea the thing probably wasnt broken in and lost some on the traction end...Gotta see what Evan Smith pulls.
Old 03-29-2009 | 08:41 AM
  #8  
unit213's Avatar
Administrator

 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 45,841
Likes: 5
From: Earth
Default

Its easily a 12 second car. Mid 12's on a drag radial.
Old 03-29-2009 | 09:36 AM
  #9  
Sarge_13's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,222
Likes: 0
From: Schertz, Texas
Default

Needs exhaust, bad.
Old 03-29-2009 | 09:46 AM
  #10  
bjamick's Avatar
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 4,218
Likes: 3
From: Birmingham AL.
Default

Just way to damn heavy.
Old 03-29-2009 | 11:24 AM
  #11  
01SOMZ28's Avatar
11 Second Club

iTrader: (37)
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 950
Likes: 4
From: Lincoln, NE
Default

the new camaro is sooooo ugly.
Old 03-29-2009 | 01:52 PM
  #12  
95TAJade's Avatar
TECH Regular
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 423
Likes: 0
From: Edmond, OK
Default

By the way that one sounded I swore it was just the v6 version. I really hope that it's more MANLY of a car when they start hitting the real roads.
Old 03-29-2009 | 02:00 PM
  #13  
Fb0dy0nly's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,490
Likes: 2
From: Detroit ROCK City
Default

From all the threads in the dyno section it seems like the LS3 takes well to tuning so I am sure with a good driver, some decent tires and some tuning/free mods, the car could be well in the 12's. Add some headers and a good flowing exhaust and 11's will be closer than you think, especially with some weight reduc. I like the new camaro, just looks heavy and is. I cant wait to see how much weight people can get off theses car without turning it into a full race car.
Old 03-29-2009 | 02:04 PM
  #14  
phasemaster1's Avatar
TECH Fanatic

iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,415
Likes: 0
From: florida
Default

Originally Posted by bjamick
Just way to damn heavy.
How much do they weigh in at?
Old 03-29-2009 | 08:19 PM
  #15  
smok'nZ's Avatar
MASS seller approved
iTrader: (160)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,944
Likes: 1
From: OKLAHOMA
Default

ugly and slow awesome
Old 03-29-2009 | 09:56 PM
  #16  
Demonicbird00's Avatar
10 Second Club
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,409
Likes: 0
From: Alloway,NJ
Default

Originally Posted by 01SOMZ28
the new camaro is sooooo ugly.
thanks god im not the only one that thinks the same thing.
Old 03-30-2009 | 04:45 PM
  #17  
camaro_five0's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 343
Likes: 1
From: Erin, TN
Default

Originally Posted by phasemaster1
How much do they weigh in at?
Right around 4000 lbs for the new SS. The new Z/28 (if it ever DOES come out) was estimated around 4100 lbs...but hell, you have 554 supercharged hp coming out of it!
Old 03-30-2009 | 04:55 PM
  #18  
1Loudz28's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (47)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 711
Likes: 0
From: BAY AREA CA
Default

ugly, slow and disappointing performance.
Old 03-30-2009 | 05:51 PM
  #19  
MYSTIC-1SC's Avatar
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,277
Likes: 14
Default

very nice.
Old 03-30-2009 | 06:09 PM
  #20  
Mangled03gmc's Avatar
Baltimore Whore

iTrader: (95)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 16,776
Likes: 0
From: In a van DOWN BY THE RIVER
Default

Originally Posted by phasemaster1
How much do they weigh in at?
3900-4000, for the ss.. Not to bad for a tank.. Few mods, you got a healthy 12 sec ride.. I am not liking the looks, but it is faster then the challenger.


Quick Reply: 2010 Camaro 13.0@110.9



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:48 PM.