Multimedia Exchange Videos | Sound Clips | Photos | Photoshop

2010 Camaro 13.0@110.9

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-28-2009, 10:50 AM
  #1  
Teching In
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
NiteRiderWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Socal
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default 2010 Camaro 13.0@110.9

check this out

http://videos.streetfire.net/video/C...-It_642342.htm
Old 03-28-2009, 05:19 PM
  #2  
Staging Lane
iTrader: (5)
 
grandsport1963's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: MOYOCK NC 27958
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

thats sad!!! glad i still have my 2000 SS
Old 03-29-2009, 12:40 AM
  #3  
Teching In
 
ssscottss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I didn't think that was sad at all. I think it's pretty respectable. For approximately the same price as a decked out Mustang GT and almost a full second quicker at a few tenths quicker then the Challenger.

A 2002 SS was rated to be around 13.4 or 13.5 was is not? I see it as a newer car which is quicker and for almost the same price they sold for 7 years ago.

Of course there's room for improvement, and I'm more then confident that plenty of members on this very site will show us just what this car is capable of.

It does need some wider shoes though

Last edited by ssscottss; 03-29-2009 at 03:02 AM.
Old 03-29-2009, 07:49 AM
  #4  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (11)
 
87silverbullet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Slidell,LA
Posts: 4,873
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

Put something sticky on the back and it is automatically in the 12's. I/E and some bolt-ons and it should be a low 12 sec, hell a high 11 sec monster with out even going in the motor.
Old 03-29-2009, 08:06 AM
  #5  
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
99_Z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 333
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by grandsport1963
thats sad!!! glad i still have my 2000 SS




Those times were recorded on a ice rink...get that car on the track with a real driver it it will be high 12's easy. Minor mods to uncork the motor will be mid low 12's. Sad my ***, the car has alot of potential.
Old 03-29-2009, 08:13 AM
  #6  
Administrator
 
unit213's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Earth
Posts: 45,841
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

I would buy one if it weighed 3,600lbs or less. Throw a little D1 on it and it would be a nice street car.
Old 03-29-2009, 08:24 AM
  #7  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (6)
 
MonmouthCtyLS7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Rotonda West Florida
Posts: 3,955
Received 30 Likes on 27 Posts

Default

Yea the thing probably wasnt broken in and lost some on the traction end...Gotta see what Evan Smith pulls.
Old 03-29-2009, 08:41 AM
  #8  
Administrator
 
unit213's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Earth
Posts: 45,841
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Its easily a 12 second car. Mid 12's on a drag radial.
Old 03-29-2009, 09:36 AM
  #9  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (1)
 
Sarge_13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Schertz, Texas
Posts: 2,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Needs exhaust, bad.
Old 03-29-2009, 09:46 AM
  #10  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (31)
 
bjamick's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Birmingham AL.
Posts: 4,218
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Just way to damn heavy.
Old 03-29-2009, 11:24 AM
  #11  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (37)
 
01SOMZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Lincoln, NE
Posts: 950
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

the new camaro is sooooo ugly.
Old 03-29-2009, 01:52 PM
  #12  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (4)
 
95TAJade's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Edmond, OK
Posts: 423
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

By the way that one sounded I swore it was just the v6 version. I really hope that it's more MANLY of a car when they start hitting the real roads.
Old 03-29-2009, 02:00 PM
  #13  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (10)
 
Fb0dy0nly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Detroit ROCK City
Posts: 1,490
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

From all the threads in the dyno section it seems like the LS3 takes well to tuning so I am sure with a good driver, some decent tires and some tuning/free mods, the car could be well in the 12's. Add some headers and a good flowing exhaust and 11's will be closer than you think, especially with some weight reduc. I like the new camaro, just looks heavy and is. I cant wait to see how much weight people can get off theses car without turning it into a full race car.
Old 03-29-2009, 02:04 PM
  #14  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (11)
 
phasemaster1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: florida
Posts: 1,415
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by bjamick
Just way to damn heavy.
How much do they weigh in at?
Old 03-29-2009, 08:19 PM
  #15  
MASS seller approved
iTrader: (160)
 
smok'nZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: OKLAHOMA
Posts: 1,944
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

ugly and slow awesome
Old 03-29-2009, 09:56 PM
  #16  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (17)
 
Demonicbird00's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Alloway,NJ
Posts: 2,409
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 01SOMZ28
the new camaro is sooooo ugly.
thanks god im not the only one that thinks the same thing.
Old 03-30-2009, 04:45 PM
  #17  
TECH Apprentice
 
camaro_five0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Erin, TN
Posts: 344
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by phasemaster1
How much do they weigh in at?
Right around 4000 lbs for the new SS. The new Z/28 (if it ever DOES come out) was estimated around 4100 lbs...but hell, you have 554 supercharged hp coming out of it!
Old 03-30-2009, 04:55 PM
  #18  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (47)
 
1Loudz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: BAY AREA CA
Posts: 711
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

ugly, slow and disappointing performance.
Old 03-30-2009, 05:51 PM
  #19  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (14)
 
MYSTIC-1SC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,278
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

very nice.
Old 03-30-2009, 06:09 PM
  #20  
Baltimore Whore
iTrader: (95)
 
Mangled03gmc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: In a van DOWN BY THE RIVER
Posts: 16,776
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by phasemaster1
How much do they weigh in at?
3900-4000, for the ss.. Not to bad for a tank.. Few mods, you got a healthy 12 sec ride.. I am not liking the looks, but it is faster then the challenger.


Quick Reply: 2010 Camaro 13.0@110.9



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:19 AM.