Multimedia Exchange Videos | Sound Clips | Photos | Photoshop

my camaro vs 347 stroker foxbody

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-08-2011, 10:46 PM
  #1  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
nasty_ss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Newark, Ohio
Posts: 195
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default my camaro vs 347 stroker foxbody

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ezixNI8oID4

camaro: 5.3L 60-1hifi turbo on 11psi
foxbody: 347 Stroker
Old 08-08-2011, 11:12 PM
  #2  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (29)
 
blue98Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: The Bayou State
Posts: 1,933
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Man those 347 foxbody's (least everyone I've ever seen) aint no joke.
Old 08-08-2011, 11:32 PM
  #3  
9 Second Club
 
07 z71 silverado's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: cleveland,mississppi
Posts: 1,069
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

347 stroker with heads, cam, intake, full exhaust can run 10's all day long.
Old 08-09-2011, 03:56 AM
  #4  
Captain Double Post
iTrader: (2)
 
BOBS99SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Elyria Ohio
Posts: 1,617
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

agree a built 347 is hard to beat,ask me how i know lol
Old 08-09-2011, 11:22 AM
  #5  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
nasty_ss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Newark, Ohio
Posts: 195
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by BOBS99SS
agree a built 347 is hard to beat,ask me how i know lol
how do you know? lol
Old 08-09-2011, 11:25 AM
  #6  
TECH Enthusiast
 
88blackgt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 507
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The *** end of fox is god awful
Old 08-09-2011, 01:26 PM
  #7  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
nasty_ss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Newark, Ohio
Posts: 195
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by 88blackgt
The *** end of fox is god awful
wouldn't be so bad if i didn't have to see so much of it. lol
Old 08-09-2011, 06:20 PM
  #8  
On The Tree
 
Heater's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Wilmywood NC
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 88blackgt
The *** end of fox is god awful
Wouldn't be so bad if he didn't have the Euro Trash tail lights
Old 08-10-2011, 03:10 AM
  #9  
Captain Double Post
iTrader: (2)
 
BOBS99SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Elyria Ohio
Posts: 1,617
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

because i got spanked a few months back, lol. thanks i was trying to avoid coming clean on that one lol,ive ran into a few fast mustangs this year ,
Old 12-20-2011, 01:07 AM
  #10  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
nasty_ss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Newark, Ohio
Posts: 195
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

so recently been getting a lot of flack from video because 90% of people only watch the first 10seconds of the video and assume the camaro gets *** raped the rest of the runs. now i understand that a turbo camaro should do better than this, but it's a little *** turbo and a much heavier car.lol
Old 12-20-2011, 02:55 AM
  #11  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (4)
 
gc302047's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: north dallas
Posts: 390
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by nasty_ss
so recently been getting a lot of flack from video because 90% of people only watch the first 10seconds of the video and assume the camaro gets *** raped the rest of the runs. now i understand that a turbo camaro should do better than this, but it's a little *** turbo and a much heavier car.lol

id say little less than a thousand pounds heavier.
Old 12-21-2011, 11:27 AM
  #12  
MASS seller approved
iTrader: (160)
 
smok'nZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: OKLAHOMA
Posts: 1,944
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by gc302047
id say little less than a thousand pounds heavier.
even if its 500 lbs thats .5 seconds slower at the track
Old 12-21-2011, 11:35 AM
  #13  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
HioSSilver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Winchester, VA
Posts: 5,938
Received 431 Likes on 338 Posts

Default

That fox is not a 10sec ride. Nasty I seen your other vid.....your giving turbo f-bodys a bad name....your given all f-bodys a bad name.
Old 12-21-2011, 01:44 PM
  #14  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (5)
 
jdiddyws6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Long Beach MS/Birmingham AL
Posts: 641
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by HioSSilver
That fox is not a 10sec ride. Nasty I seen your other vid.....your giving turbo f-bodys a bad name....your given all f-bodys a bad name.
This. and you're*
Old 12-22-2011, 06:43 AM
  #15  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (6)
 
MonmouthCtyLS7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Rotonda West Florida
Posts: 3,955
Received 30 Likes on 27 Posts

Default

That fox surprised me
Old 12-23-2011, 10:51 PM
  #16  
Launching!
iTrader: (1)
 
kennyxg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 229
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by HioSSilver
That fox is not a 10sec ride. Nasty I seen your other vid.....your giving turbo f-bodys a bad name....your given all f-bodys a bad name.
Dude you are so ignorant when it comes to motors, that fox would monkey stomp that camaro from a dig. The torque and power of the bigger displacement motor comes into effect immediately.The Camaro clearly had turbo lag and even then questionably had the cubes to win any way. If the fox wasn't 10's which it was then the 5.3 was slower than that. Quit being brand loyal and make an intelligent statement... Which it did in 3:17 of the vid...

Last edited by kennyxg; 12-23-2011 at 10:59 PM.
Old 12-24-2011, 08:33 AM
  #17  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
HioSSilver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Winchester, VA
Posts: 5,938
Received 431 Likes on 338 Posts

Default

What's the fox run then? Sure as hell did'nt sound or look like a 10sec car to me. A turbo 5.3 in a f-body should be. One thing for sure a 5.3 on 11lb should run a hell of alot better than op's car does.

How is that being brand loyal?

There is only about 20ci difference and one has a turbo....you don't know what your talkin bout.

Last edited by HioSSilver; 12-24-2011 at 12:01 PM.
Old 12-24-2011, 11:12 AM
  #18  
On The Tree
iTrader: (2)
 
ozzyls12001's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Mexico
Posts: 107
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

i have a SN95 347 stroker and they are no joke put 416 rwhp ,they can handle with a Cammed LS1 bolt on easily,

Last edited by ozzyls12001; 12-24-2011 at 07:44 PM.
Old 12-24-2011, 11:57 AM
  #19  
TECH Senior Member
 
| Powered by Satan |'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Houston / University of Texas, Austin
Posts: 6,955
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I'll be building a motor through this year for the car... it currently has a h/c/i 302 and I made 330 to the rear wheels.

I have a couple routes, but i'm personal friends with the Owners of S.A.M. (School of Automotive Machinists) my brother attended and worked there for 4 years and my neighbor is one of their head instructors.


If my year is half as good as 2011, I'll be putting in pump gas version of a stock car motor... shooting for 700hp NA from a sbf
Old 12-24-2011, 12:02 PM
  #20  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
HioSSilver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Winchester, VA
Posts: 5,938
Received 431 Likes on 338 Posts

Default

Good luck with your build. But something tells me there will be little left that is truly sbf.


Quick Reply: my camaro vs 347 stroker foxbody



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:03 PM.