ls1 vs 05 gt stock vs stock
02-25-2007, 10:39 PM
#2
On The Tree
iTrader: (14)
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
No vids, but finally in 2005 Ford made the mustang fast enough to compete with a 93 f-body. I think a good race is between the LT1 and the new 3v 4.6 LS1 would stomp one.
02-25-2007, 10:41 PM
#3
12 Second Club
iTrader: (16)
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: central coast, cali
Posts: 783
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Me in my car when it just had a borla exhuast/lid... i had a horrible launch/reaction time. But im facing a 05 mustang Gt and he had intake//exhuast/tune. i hit a 13.2@108 and he hit i think almost a second slower... the announcer said so, lol. Anyways, not impressed with the new Gt nor the new Cobra (500hp.... but weighs a ton!!!!!)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b4Ks2zjd-Nk
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b4Ks2zjd-Nk
02-25-2007, 10:58 PM
#4
TECH Resident
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Enid, OK
Posts: 827
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 1fastz
Me in my car when it just had a borla exhuast/lid... i had a horrible launch/reaction time. But im facing a 05 mustang Gt and he had intake//exhuast/tune. i hit a 13.2@108 and he hit i think almost a second slower... the announcer said so, lol. Anyways, not impressed with the new Gt nor the new Cobra (500hp.... but weighs a ton!!!!!)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b4Ks2zjd-Nk
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b4Ks2zjd-Nk
The announcers are all on the Mustangs nuts untill the end!I think that Mustang needs the driver mod though. A tune on those cars does wonders and with the intake and exhaust, that car shouldn't be too far from mid to low 13's.
To the original poster, if both cars are driven properly and in stock trim, the LS1 is capable of 3+ lengths (just from my experiance-sorry no vids)
02-26-2007, 06:34 AM
#6
Administrator
A friend went 13.85 @ 102mph in bone stock trim
with about 75 miles on the odometer. Not bad, but
definitely a few cars behind a stock LS1.
The 3v mod motor has some nice potential though for only
a 281cid motor.
I'm not sure of this car's specs. I believe it's got a D1 and
a little nitrous (built motor of course). Just Burcham cracks
off a 9.30 on a shitty 1.63 60'. That's an 8 second car.
Not too shabby.
http://videos.streetfire.net/video/9...8000f007b5.htm
with about 75 miles on the odometer. Not bad, but
definitely a few cars behind a stock LS1.
The 3v mod motor has some nice potential though for only
a 281cid motor.
I'm not sure of this car's specs. I believe it's got a D1 and
a little nitrous (built motor of course). Just Burcham cracks
off a 9.30 on a shitty 1.63 60'. That's an 8 second car.
Not too shabby.
http://videos.streetfire.net/video/9...8000f007b5.htm
02-26-2007, 06:52 AM
#7
Originally Posted by unit213
A friend went 13.85 @ 102mph in bone stock trim
with about 75 miles on the odometer. Not bad, but
definitely a few cars behind a stock LS1.
The 3v mod motor has some nice potential though for only
a 281cid motor.
I'm not sure of this car's specs. I believe it's got a D1 and
a little nitrous (built motor of course). Just Burcham cracks
off a 9.30 on a shitty 1.63 60'. That's an 8 second car.
Not too shabby.
http://videos.streetfire.net/video/9...8000f007b5.htm
with about 75 miles on the odometer. Not bad, but
definitely a few cars behind a stock LS1.
The 3v mod motor has some nice potential though for only
a 281cid motor.
I'm not sure of this car's specs. I believe it's got a D1 and
a little nitrous (built motor of course). Just Burcham cracks
off a 9.30 on a shitty 1.63 60'. That's an 8 second car.
Not too shabby.
http://videos.streetfire.net/video/9...8000f007b5.htm
bad *** video doesn't take much to shift that thing
Trending Topics
02-26-2007, 05:40 PM
#14
Teching In
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: NE
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by BRAKE
No vids, but finally in 2005 Ford made the mustang fast enough to compete with a 93 f-body. I think a good race is between the LT1 and the new 3v 4.6 LS1 would stomp one.
The following is from my experience:
LT1 Fbody vs 99up2vGT =drivers race
LS1 Fbody vs 99up2vGT= LS1 wins by alot
LS1 Fbody vs 32vMach1= drivers race/advantage to the fbody
32vmach1 vs 3vGT=drivers race/slight advantage mach1
LS1 Fbody vs 3vGT=drivers race/advantage to the fbody
LS1 Fbody vs 03/04 Cobra= Cobra wins by alot
In my experience (as in actually driving the cars) 05 and up GTs are just as quick as Mach1s. And if an LS1 has a crappy driver the GT or mach can take him. Just my 2 cents.
02-26-2007, 07:51 PM
#16
On The Tree
iTrader: (14)
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Ponyboyisaac
dude you have to be kidding, a 93 fbody as in "LT1" would def get beat by a 3v GT. Now a 3v GT would have its hands full with an LS1 fbody.
The following is from my experience:
LT1 Fbody vs 99up2vGT =drivers race
LS1 Fbody vs 99up2vGT= LS1 wins by alot
LS1 Fbody vs 32vMach1= drivers race/advantage to the fbody
32vmach1 vs 3vGT=drivers race/slight advantage mach1
LS1 Fbody vs 3vGT=drivers race/advantage to the fbody
LS1 Fbody vs 03/04 Cobra= Cobra wins by alot
In my experience (as in actually driving the cars) 05 and up GTs are just as quick as Mach1s. And if an LS1 has a crappy driver the GT or mach can take him. Just my 2 cents.
The following is from my experience:
LT1 Fbody vs 99up2vGT =drivers race
LS1 Fbody vs 99up2vGT= LS1 wins by alot
LS1 Fbody vs 32vMach1= drivers race/advantage to the fbody
32vmach1 vs 3vGT=drivers race/slight advantage mach1
LS1 Fbody vs 3vGT=drivers race/advantage to the fbody
LS1 Fbody vs 03/04 Cobra= Cobra wins by alot
In my experience (as in actually driving the cars) 05 and up GTs are just as quick as Mach1s. And if an LS1 has a crappy driver the GT or mach can take him. Just my 2 cents.
02-26-2007, 08:19 PM
#17
Administrator
Originally Posted by BRAKE
Really............so no stock LT1 is capable of running high 13's from around 101-104 mph?
That's enough to run with stock GT's though. If I recall right,
Patman (moderator) ran a 13.80 @ 102mph in bone
stock trim way back in the day in his LT1.
02-26-2007, 09:54 PM
#18
On The Tree
iTrader: (14)
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by unit213
High 13...sure. 101-102mph...sure. 104mph is stretching it.
That's enough to run with stock GT's though. If I recall right,
Patman (moderator) ran a 13.80 @ 102mph in bone
stock trim way back in the day in his LT1.
That's enough to run with stock GT's though. If I recall right,
Patman (moderator) ran a 13.80 @ 102mph in bone
stock trim way back in the day in his LT1.
02-27-2007, 12:41 AM
#19
Originally Posted by BRAKE
Youre right 104 maybe a little high. But out of the 6 people I know with stock LT1's, only one goes 14's @ 98ish mph. Most of them are right in the 13.70 area though, only at about 102 though.
02-27-2007, 01:57 AM
#20
Banned
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Upstate NY
Posts: 1,292
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Ponyboyisaac
dude you have to be kidding, a 93 fbody as in "LT1" would def get beat by a 3v GT. Now a 3v GT would have its hands full with an LS1 fbody.
The following is from my experience:
LT1 Fbody vs 99up2vGT =drivers race
LS1 Fbody vs 99up2vGT= LS1 wins by alot
LS1 Fbody vs 32vMach1= drivers race/advantage to the fbody
32vmach1 vs 3vGT=drivers race/slight advantage mach1
LS1 Fbody vs 3vGT=drivers race/advantage to the fbody
LS1 Fbody vs 03/04 Cobra= Cobra wins by alot
In my experience (as in actually driving the cars) 05 and up GTs are just as quick as Mach1s. And if an LS1 has a crappy driver the GT or mach can take him. Just my 2 cents.
The following is from my experience:
LT1 Fbody vs 99up2vGT =drivers race
LS1 Fbody vs 99up2vGT= LS1 wins by alot
LS1 Fbody vs 32vMach1= drivers race/advantage to the fbody
32vmach1 vs 3vGT=drivers race/slight advantage mach1
LS1 Fbody vs 3vGT=drivers race/advantage to the fbody
LS1 Fbody vs 03/04 Cobra= Cobra wins by alot
In my experience (as in actually driving the cars) 05 and up GTs are just as quick as Mach1s. And if an LS1 has a crappy driver the GT or mach can take him. Just my 2 cents.
Thanks you for your post of bullshit and wisdom...
I can tell you my 95 A4 was mostly stock for a couple years (Moroso and Loudmouth) and I had NO problem putting lengths on 2V GT's, and could even run with the newer ones. (3V's)
An older, slower 93ish GU2 A4 LT1 might be a good race against a 99-04 GT, but so would a 96 SS against a 98-00 LS1 A4.
And the LS1 most definitely has the advantage over the 3VGT.
Maybe next time you should buy a car with some ***** :p
I have never EVER seen a Stock 2V GT go faster then a 14.1 here at the IRP in NY, and my LT1 managed a 13.89 @ 99 mph with NO mods at all.
LT1's are certainly nothing special, but their ALOT better then those crappy 2V GT's