New LS1 Owners - Newbie Tech Basic Technical Questions & Advice
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

LQ4 vs. Fbody Pullout LS1

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-10-2009, 11:46 AM
  #1  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
mtflyboy25's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Billings, MT and Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Arrow LQ4 vs. Fbody Pullout LS1

I am wondering the advantages disadvantages with going with the truck motor, the 6.0 or just a regualr F-body pullout 5.7... I know that I will be running a T56 with either so that isnt the question, and it will be going in my 91 Z28.

Any advice will be greatly appreciated!
Old 12-10-2009, 11:50 AM
  #2  
Launching!
iTrader: (3)
 
mastercoryd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Johnston
Posts: 272
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

for one, the price of an lq4 is wicked cheap, disadvantage is the extra weight
Old 12-10-2009, 11:51 AM
  #3  
TECH Fanatic
 
FiredUpZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Elgin, Il
Posts: 1,287
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Well for one the 6.0 should be stronger than the 5.7 (assuming your going with an iron block, which I think they all are).
Old 12-10-2009, 12:03 PM
  #4  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
mtflyboy25's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Billings, MT and Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

They fit the same in the car though right? So as far as install goes it isnt any harder to go with the LQ4 6.0 vs. the 5.7?
Old 12-10-2009, 12:04 PM
  #5  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
mtflyboy25's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Billings, MT and Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Exclamation

Originally Posted by mastercoryd
for one, the price of an lq4 is wicked cheap, disadvantage is the extra weight
Yeah thats why I started looking at them.. I just want to see why they are so cheap now... bad engine? Way harder to install? The weight will still be less than it was, and I am not looking for an all out drag car so the iron block will be fine..
Old 12-10-2009, 12:14 PM
  #6  
Launching!
iTrader: (3)
 
mastercoryd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Johnston
Posts: 272
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by mtflyboy25
Yeah thats why I started looking at them.. I just want to see why they are so cheap now... bad engine? Way harder to install? The weight will still be less than it was, and I am not looking for an all out drag car so the iron block will be fine..
its not junk by any means, people take out there ls1's and build lq4's its just if you dont mind the extra weight... stock for stock im not sure if their the same horse power im sure some one else can answer that for you though.
Old 12-10-2009, 12:18 PM
  #7  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (20)
 
RedRallyeZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Sugartit, South Carolina
Posts: 1,395
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

And you can use l92 heads on the 6.0. Really if iron being heavier isn't a problem there are no disadvantages to the truck motor
Old 12-10-2009, 12:19 PM
  #8  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (14)
 
redbird555's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Pompano Beach FL
Posts: 4,444
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

Stock for stock the ls1 is a bit stronger with 350hp to the lq4's 320ish an lq9 which is basically an lq4 with different pistons for a higher compression ratio is rated at 345hp.
Old 12-10-2009, 12:21 PM
  #9  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
mtflyboy25's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Billings, MT and Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by redbird555
Stock for stock the ls1 is a bit stronger with 350hp to the lq4's 320ish an lq9 which is basically an lq4 with different pistons for a higher compression ratio is rated at 345hp.
I will be doing a complete rebuild of either engine, but it looks like the LQ4 or LQ9 will be my better option because of the far cheaper price! You guys respond really fast haha that's awesome!
Old 12-10-2009, 12:26 PM
  #10  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
mtflyboy25's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Billings, MT and Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Arrow

Originally Posted by redbird555
Stock for stock the ls1 is a bit stronger with 350hp to the lq4's 320ish an lq9 which is basically an lq4 with different pistons for a higher compression ratio is rated at 345hp.
Originally Posted by RedRallyeZ
And you can use l92 heads on the 6.0. Really if iron being heavier isn't a problem there are no disadvantages to the truck motor
Sorry for a newb question but what difference does being able to use l92 heads on it make?
Old 12-10-2009, 12:46 PM
  #11  
TECH Fanatic
 
LS1W66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: St. Clair Shores Mi.
Posts: 1,265
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by mtflyboy25
Sorry for a newb question but what difference does being able to use l92 heads on it make?
L92's are the new Square port head that flow better then most aftermarket heads. and their cheap at approx $500 each complete.
Old 12-10-2009, 01:06 PM
  #12  
TECH Fanatic
 
406malibu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Shillington PA
Posts: 1,775
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

if given the choice I'd go with the 6.0 lq4/9 any modding you do the 6.0 will have better gains. with full bolt ons and a cam you are easily in the low/mid 400's (to the wheels) with the truck motors. While this is also true for the ls1's, for the price difference i'd stick with the iron block, plus with the extra CI it'll have the potential for more.
Old 12-11-2009, 12:56 AM
  #13  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
mtflyboy25's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Billings, MT and Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LS1W66
L92's are the new Square port head that flow better then most aftermarket heads. and their cheap at approx $500 each complete.
Oh okay I think I have heard of those... I will keep them in mind...


Originally Posted by 406malibu
if given the choice I'd go with the 6.0 lq4/9 any modding you do the 6.0 will have better gains. with full bolt ons and a cam you are easily in the low/mid 400's (to the wheels) with the truck motors. While this is also true for the ls1's, for the price difference i'd stick with the iron block, plus with the extra CI it'll have the potential for more.
Well that makes me feel ready to start this project! Now if only I had the money right now haha..
Old 12-11-2009, 07:09 PM
  #14  
Staging Lane
 
OUTLWZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Waco,Tx
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 406malibu
if given the choice I'd go with the 6.0 lq4/9 any modding you do the 6.0 will have better gains. with full bolt ons and a cam you are easily in the low/mid 400's (to the wheels) with the truck motors. While this is also true for the ls1's, for the price difference i'd stick with the iron block, plus with the extra CI it'll have the potential for more.
I would have to agree with that...

And the LQ-motors do have more torque.
Old 12-11-2009, 08:15 PM
  #15  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (9)
 
82cetuner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Denham Springs, LA
Posts: 1,368
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

you will need a camaro oil pan, accessories, and intake but other than that you should be good and with aluminum heads weight will be less

Last edited by 82cetuner; 12-11-2009 at 09:04 PM.
Old 12-12-2009, 05:31 PM
  #16  
On The Tree
iTrader: (9)
 
2manytoyz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: east indiana
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

no replacment for displacment
Old 12-12-2009, 05:32 PM
  #17  
On The Tree
iTrader: (9)
 
2manytoyz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: east indiana
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Id go with the lsi because all the accerious will fit and the oil pan and such,plus alum block!
Old 12-13-2009, 04:45 PM
  #18  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
mtflyboy25's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Billings, MT and Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 2manytoyz
Id go with the lsi because all the accerious will fit and the oil pan and such,plus alum block!
Well I am not worried about the extra weight of the block.. and the accesories and pan I can get for less than the difference of buying an LS1 vs a LQ4
Old 12-13-2009, 08:04 PM
  #19  
Staging Lane
 
OUTLWZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Waco,Tx
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

If I remember right... The weight difference is only 63lb's.
Old 12-13-2009, 08:20 PM
  #20  
On The Tree
iTrader: (4)
 
E-Works's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: chicago
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i just sold the lq4 i puschased for my swap and made a hundred bucks off of it and i am just going with the ls1 as by the time u by the fbody oilpan etc... your about the same price as just buying a ls1 or a ls2 . look into all your options before you purchase anything and the bore for the lq4 being 4 inches helps with what heads you can use as mentioned

i just thought the weight and the savings on the oil pan was worth it to me


Quick Reply: LQ4 vs. Fbody Pullout LS1



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:21 AM.