New LS1 Owners - Newbie Tech Basic Technical Questions & Advice
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

camaro vs corvette !!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-19-2006 | 03:57 AM
  #1  
bashar_255's Avatar
Thread Starter
Teching In
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Exclamation camaro vs corvette !!

I was chatting with some guys in a show and they told me that the the camaro can beat the corvette if they both was stock

Are they speak serious ?
Old 02-19-2006 | 04:24 AM
  #2  
dyls1's Avatar
Launching!

iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 223
Likes: 0
From: So Cal
Default

Yeah they are speak serious
Old 02-19-2006 | 04:34 AM
  #3  
kendo347's Avatar
On The Tree
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
From: Euless, Tx
Default

No!! Stock to stock the corvette usually wins by 3-4 tenths. The f-bodys will usually dyno 10-20 more but the weight difference and aerodynamics gives the vette the edge.
Old 02-19-2006 | 04:49 AM
  #4  
orangeapeel's Avatar
ЯєŧąяĐ Єl¡m¡иąŧøя ™

iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 16,083
Likes: 4
From: Justin, TX
Default

Spell check anyone?
Old 02-19-2006 | 04:51 AM
  #5  
Nocturnal SS's Avatar
11 Second Club
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
Default

The Vette will only win by a tenth.
Old 02-19-2006 | 05:35 AM
  #6  
2.73 Vette's Avatar
On The Tree
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
Default

I agree...1-2 tenths for the C5 coupe vrs fbody..it's a close race through the 1/4 mile and sometimes a strong fbody can pull the upset.

but a betting man would put his money on the C5 coupe with equal drivers...

Also the C5 tops out at 170-176 ( depending on magazine)

The fbody tops out at 158-163 ( depending on magazine)

So mn6 C5 vrs mn6 f body the C5 is faster in 0-60 mph..The 1/4 mile and has a higher top speed. It is the faster car..

Unfortunetly 70% of the C5's you see on the road are the automatic versions with 2.73 gears...

The C5 was made with 2.73 gears all the way till 2004...

The Fbodys were only made with automatic 3.23 gears in the last few years of cars...

A 2.73 C5 and a 3.23 fbody are a very close run through the 1/4 mile..

But a 2.73 geared C5 will normally lose to a mn6 3.42 geared fbody..

It is the 2.73 geared C5 vrs mn6 fbody races that people have seen and get the idea that the camaro/firebird is faster than the C5.
Old 02-19-2006 | 06:55 AM
  #7  
CBX's Avatar
CBX
TECH Apprentice
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 332
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Nocturnal SS
The Vette will only win by a tenth.
Damn, I didn't think the Camaro was that fast.
Old 02-19-2006 | 07:14 AM
  #8  
bashar_255's Avatar
Thread Starter
Teching In
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Default

thanx guys
Old 02-19-2006 | 07:29 AM
  #9  
SideStep's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,943
Likes: 1
Default

Old 02-19-2006 | 08:36 AM
  #10  
Patman's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 7,234
Likes: 1
From: Mississauga, Ontario
Default

Originally Posted by 2.73 Vette


Unfortunetly 70% of the C5's you see on the road are the automatic versions with 2.73 gears...

The C5 was made with 2.73 gears all the way till 2004...

The Fbodys were only made with automatic 3.23 gears in the last few years of cars...
Whoa, lots of misinformation here! The percentage of 2.73 geared C5s is definitely not 70%! For instance, in 2004 it was only 33% of production, in 2003 it was 24% of production, in 2002 it was only 26% of production. Shall I continue?

I don't know what you mean by saying the C5 was made with 2.73 gears all the way until 2004. You could get 3.15 gears with the automatic in every single year of the C5 from 97 to 04. My 98 has the 3.15s in it.

And what are you talking about when you say F-bodies were only made with 3.23s in the last few years? The 3.23s were available in every single year of the automatic 4th gen f-body from 1993 to 2002. My 95 Formula had 3.23 gears in it.
Old 02-19-2006 | 09:57 AM
  #11  
GuitsBoy's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 6,249
Likes: 3
From: Long Island, NY
Default

Dont forget the weight difference too...

I agree with teh vette by 1 to 2 tenths as a rule of thumb.
Old 02-19-2006 | 11:52 AM
  #12  
jrp's Avatar
jrp
SN95 Director

iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 10,755
Likes: 5
From: Valencia, Ca
Default

Originally Posted by Patman
Whoa, lots of misinformation here! The percentage of 2.73 geared C5s is definitely not 70%! For instance, in 2004 it was only 33% of production, in 2003 it was 24% of production, in 2002 it was only 26% of production. Shall I continue?

I don't know what you mean by saying the C5 was made with 2.73 gears all the way until 2004. You could get 3.15 gears with the automatic in every single year of the C5 from 97 to 04. My 98 has the 3.15s in it.

And what are you talking about when you say F-bodies were only made with 3.23s in the last few years? The 3.23s were available in every single year of the automatic 4th gen f-body from 1993 to 2002. My 95 Formula had 3.23 gears in it.
you beat me to it patman 2.73's doesnt know much about anythinig. 3.23's on the fbody were standard on SS/WS6 cars and an option for the z28/formula/ta.

all things being equal the c5 will will due to the weight and drag coefficient advantage.
Old 02-19-2006 | 11:58 AM
  #13  
'Trust''s Avatar
10 Second Club

iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 7,972
Likes: 3
From: Eternity
Default

Is the drag coeffcient really that much of a factor in the 1/4? I wouldnt think that the vehicle would be going fast enough to make a difference, at least not at speeds below 109 MPH. The weight is definatly an advantage, and w/equal drivers I agree the Vette should take the win, but a majority of Vettes F-Body guys come up against on the street are older guys that have never take their car WOT but once or twice and lose due to lack of experience, that could be the origin of the F-Body is faster.
Old 02-19-2006 | 12:04 PM
  #14  
WS6FirebirdTA00's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 8,319
Likes: 1
From: North Carolina
Default

Originally Posted by orangeapeel
Spell check anyone?
haha, i dont nkow why its a big deal, there seems to be a lot of bench racing going on around here lately. with the cars as close as they are its a drivers race.
Old 02-19-2006 | 01:47 PM
  #15  
StealthZ06's Avatar
TECH Resident
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 875
Likes: 0
Default

Yes it's true, a well driven LS1 Fbody with a stick will just barely beat an auto C5. But when you compare with the same transmissions, and the same drivers, the advantage goes to the vette. It makes the same amount of power (true dual exhaust, but the IRS eats up a little more), and is slightly lighter. If you come up against a 99-00 Fixed Roof Coupe, you would be in trouble because they have a 200+ lbs weight advantage. If you ever run into a Z06, you're going to need 40+rwhp more than he has just to keep up (only 3,117 lbs compared to the f-bodies 3,400+ lbs).
Old 02-19-2006 | 10:37 PM
  #16  
proxemics's Avatar
On The Tree

 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 180
Likes: 0
From: saudi arabia
Default

hi bashar LSs1power answered you in the other forum

by the way no body mentioned IRS Vs solid
Old 02-19-2006 | 10:43 PM
  #17  
Ell Ess Won's Avatar
TECH Addict
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 2,245
Likes: 0
From: Top of 4th Gear; Plano, TX
Default

Originally Posted by kendo347
No!! Stock to stock the corvette usually wins by 3-4 tenths. The f-bodys will usually dyno 10-20 more but the weight difference and aerodynamics gives the vette the edge.
Wow can you say biased?

Stock for stock it's usually a drivers race. Also depends on dig or roll race.
Old 02-19-2006 | 10:58 PM
  #18  
StealthZ06's Avatar
TECH Resident
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 875
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by proxemics
hi bashar LSs1power answered you in the other forum

by the way no body mentioned IRS Vs solid

Look in the post directly above yours.
Old 02-19-2006 | 11:12 PM
  #19  
Pewter99FRC's Avatar
Teching In
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
From: Greenville, SC
Default

if you're comparing straight line only! take the two cars on an autox or roadcourse and you're going to see a big difference.

And yes FRC are 200+ lbs lighter..... its the only way to go
Old 02-19-2006 | 11:14 PM
  #20  
LookinAtMyPlate's Avatar
Launching!

iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 280
Likes: 0
From: Westland
Default

welll
one way to solve this
i got a stock m6 camaro ss
now we need a stock c5 and ill meet you at the strip in a few



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:37 PM.