Nitrous Oxide Installation | Tuning | Products
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Line Length Ratio??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 5, 2007 | 08:10 AM
  #1  
bluehawk2's Avatar
Thread Starter
10 Second Club
iTrader: (74)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,439
Likes: 2
From: Tupelo, MS
Default Line Length Ratio??

I need to shorten my fuel line on my nitrous kit, but I don't know how short of a line to get. I run my kit at 950psi. How much shorter does the fuel line need to be?


thanks
Reply
Old Sep 5, 2007 | 09:41 AM
  #2  
Chris@NitroDaves
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

If you are tring to do away with a lean spike then you can shorten the hose a couple of inch's. We can make or cut down any size line that you will need.

-Chris
Reply
Old Sep 5, 2007 | 12:57 PM
  #3  
bluehawk2's Avatar
Thread Starter
10 Second Club
iTrader: (74)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,439
Likes: 2
From: Tupelo, MS
Default

I am trying to do away with the lean spike, but How much shorter is enough.


The fuel is at 60 lbs and has 16 inches to travel before it reaches the nozzle.

The nitrous is at 950 lbs and has 16 inches to travel through the same size line.


It seems like the fuel line would have to be at least half the length of the nitrous to get rid of the spike.


I was just wondering if anyone had done a calculation to see just how much shorter fuel would have to be so that they both reached the nozzle at the same time.


Thanks
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2007 | 03:34 PM
  #4  
bluehawk2's Avatar
Thread Starter
10 Second Club
iTrader: (74)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,439
Likes: 2
From: Tupelo, MS
Default

We don't have any engineers that want to take a shot at this question??
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2007 | 10:47 AM
  #5  
Dragman's Avatar
11 Second Club
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 528
Likes: 0
From: Ky
Default

Reply
Old Sep 10, 2007 | 11:57 AM
  #6  
rdmelton's Avatar
12 Second Club
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
From: Indiana
Default

I'll take a shot at it, but I'll put a huge disclaimer that this is completely theoretical and has lots of assumptions. I'm not responsible if you do damage to anything based on my ramblings.

I used the Bernoulli equation (which assumes many things, including that there are incompressible liquids) and simplified it to P = 0.5*density*velocity^2 which is applicable for both the nitrous and fuel:
(nitrous pressure) = 0.5*(nitrous density)*(nitrous velocity)^2
and
(fuel pressure) = 0.5*(fuel density)*(fuel velocity)^2

The major assumptions here are that there are no significant differences in elevation between the solenoid and the nozzle and that friction losses in the line are not significant.

I also used: velocity = distance (aka hose length)/time, and the time for each is the same, and so the ratio of the hose lengths would be:

(fuel hose length)/(nitrous hose length) = Square root of ((fuel pressure)/(fuel density)) * ((nitrous density)/(nitrous pressure))

So if fuel pressure is 58 psi (nominal value for LS1), fuel density is 0.76 kg/L (I found a range from 0.72 to 0.80 and it varies with temperature), nitrous pressure is 950 psi (normally 900-1100), and nitrous density is 1.22 kg/L (I assumed it was liquid and it varies with temperature), the result is a ratio of 0.31. So if the nitrous hose was 16", the fuel hose would be 5". That is ridiculously short, but then again the nitrous has a significantly higher pressure so it's not that surprising. Realistically, I think that many people have used nitrous hoses that are about half as long as the fuel hoses and had pretty good luck with it.
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2007 | 10:57 AM
  #7  
bluehawk2's Avatar
Thread Starter
10 Second Club
iTrader: (74)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,439
Likes: 2
From: Tupelo, MS
Default

That ratio sounds like it would be correct given the large pressure difference between the fuel and the nitrous.

I do have another option...............A timer that will delay the nitrous solenoid in 1/10 of a second increments. This way I wouldn't have to do a lot of experiments with line length.

Thanks for the calculation
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2007 | 05:27 PM
  #8  
rdmelton's Avatar
12 Second Club
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
From: Indiana
Default

Using the formulas above, the velocity of the nitrous would be about 340 ft/s, so it would take 0.004 seconds to go 16" from the solenoid to the nozzle and the velocity of the fuel would be about 106 ft/s, so it would take about 0.013 seconds to go 16" from the solenoid to the nozzle. The time difference is only about one hundredth of a second.
Reply
LS1 Tech Stories

The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time

story-0

Retro Modern Bandit Pontiac Trans AM Comes With Burt Reynolds' Autograph

 Verdad Gallardo
story-1

Top 10 Greatest Cadillac V Series Performance Models Ever, Ranked

 Pouria Savadkouei
story-2

Top 10 Most Powerful Chevy Trucks Ever Made!

 
story-3

Hennessey's New Supercharged Silverado ZR2 Has 700 HP

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

Coachbuilt N2A Anteros Is an LS2-Powered C6 Corvette In Italian Clothes

 Verdad Gallardo
story-5

Awesome K5 Blazer Restomod Comes With C7 Corvette Power

 Verdad Gallardo
story-6

10 Camaros You Should Never Buy

 
story-7

10 LS Engine Myths That Refuse to Die

 Verdad Gallardo
story-8

Five Reasons the Camaro Was the Most Pivotal Player in the Pony Car Wars 2.0

 Brett Foote
story-9

10 Reasons the LS7 Is GM's Most Extreme Naturally Aspirated V8 Engine Ever

 Verdad Gallardo
Old Sep 11, 2007 | 08:30 PM
  #9  
DuronClocker's Avatar
11 Second Club
15 Year Member
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,241
Likes: 1
From: Clearwater, FL
Default

And that's why you always have a lean spike upon activation when you're using lines of equal length for the nitrous and fuel jets.
Reply
Old Sep 12, 2007 | 07:44 AM
  #10  
bluehawk2's Avatar
Thread Starter
10 Second Club
iTrader: (74)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,439
Likes: 2
From: Tupelo, MS
Default

I am not sure how small of an increment I can adjust the timer. I will have to check into that before I purchase it. I am about to hard line my nitrous kit, so, I will run the fuel line about a third of the length of the nitrous line. When I get it all done I will see If I still have the spike and go from there.

I will let everyone know how it turns out.

thanks
Reply
Old Sep 12, 2007 | 07:47 AM
  #11  
bluehawk2's Avatar
Thread Starter
10 Second Club
iTrader: (74)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,439
Likes: 2
From: Tupelo, MS
Default

I am sure running a 3/16th hard line will change the calculations a little bit, but at least It won't cost much to go back and change the line lengths.
Reply
Old Sep 12, 2007 | 07:57 PM
  #12  
Lonnies Performance's Avatar
LS1TECH Sponsor
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,662
Likes: 2
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Default

Just remember that the above calculation does not take into effect the difference in jet sizes. This effects the speed of flow to the engine as well.

.01 seconds will not even likely show up at the o2. How many samples per second are you logging at & how long is the lean spike?

Did you ever try to purge your fuel system by bringing the rpm up to about 3k & hitting the activation switch with the bottle off? Try this with no pressure in the nitrous line. How long does it take to bog the motor.

Do this first, then immediately open the bottle, purge the nitrous & see if it still has the lean spike.
Reply
Old Sep 12, 2007 | 09:46 PM
  #13  
SmaknaSS's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,684
Likes: 0
Default

I wonder how this equation would work with a progressive controller. I would hate to think of the nitrous and fuel lines being so different in length that it would cause nitrous and fuel lines to be "Out Of Phase with each other causing a rapid rich to lean condition while the progressive controller is activating? any thoughts on that?
Reply




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:59 AM.

story-0
Retro Modern Bandit Pontiac Trans AM Comes With Burt Reynolds' Autograph

Slideshow: A modern Camaro transformed into a retro icon, this limited-run "Bandit" build blends nostalgia with brute force in a way few revivals manage.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-21 13:57:02


VIEW MORE
story-1
Top 10 Greatest Cadillac V Series Performance Models Ever, Ranked

Slideshow: Cadillac didn't just crash the high-performance luxury vehicle party, it showed up loud, supercharged, and occasionally a little unhinged...

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-04-16 10:05:15


VIEW MORE
story-2
Top 10 Most Powerful Chevy Trucks Ever Made!

Slideshow: Top ten most powerful Chevy trucks ever made

By | 2026-03-25 09:22:26


VIEW MORE
story-3
Hennessey's New Supercharged Silverado ZR2 Has 700 HP

Slideshow: Hennessey has turned the Silverado ZR2 into a 700-hp off-road monster with supercharged V8 power and a limited production run.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-03-24 18:57:52


VIEW MORE
story-4
Coachbuilt N2A Anteros Is an LS2-Powered C6 Corvette In Italian Clothes

Slideshow: A one-off sports car that looks like a vintage Italian exotic-but hides a C6 Corvette underneath-just sold for the price of a new mid-engine Corvette.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-03-23 18:53:41


VIEW MORE
story-5
Awesome K5 Blazer Restomod Comes With C7 Corvette Power

Slideshow: A heavily reworked 1972 K5 Blazer swaps its off-road roots for a low-slung street-focused build with modern V8 power.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-03-09 18:08:45


VIEW MORE
story-6
10 Camaros You Should Never Buy

Slideshow: There are thousands of used Camaros on the market but we think you should avoid these 10

By | 2026-02-17 17:09:30


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 LS Engine Myths That Refuse to Die

Slideshows: Which one of these myths do you believe?

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-01-28 18:10:11


VIEW MORE
story-8
Five Reasons the Camaro Was the Most Pivotal Player in the Pony Car Wars 2.0

The world was a better place when it was still around.

By Brett Foote | 2026-01-23 09:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-9
10 Reasons the LS7 Is GM's Most Extreme Naturally Aspirated V8 Engine Ever

Slideshow: The 7.0-liter LS7 was designed for absolute cutting-edge performance.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-01-07 18:36:00


VIEW MORE