WB O2 Purchasing options....
Any significantly better deals? Im a EE, but I have no tools better than a Fluke multi at my disposal.
\chris
http://fjoinc.com/automotive/WBO2details.htm#afrdis
Anything out there that is much better/cheaper?
I would prefer a 1/100ths display, although I dont suppose the system is really that acurrate.
\chris
I did find another company in sweden or something it was about the same price.
Gary
[ February 22, 2002: Message edited by: red ws6 99 ]</p>
Good luck, Ed
Im gonna be ordering one of these kits very shortly, along with LS1Edit. I like the Vacuum display, because I believe it has facilities for an alarm. Imagine running NO2 when a bad A/F would turn off the system... (just a wild idea).
Thanks for the good idea with the RPM time domain offset...
\chris
I think the A/C pressure circuit is a 0-5v input - at least on lt1 f-bodies. You could use a normal logging tool and include the a/c pressure data in your log - then just load it up in excel, map the trasfer function, and convert it to a/f ratio (or just identify the ac points ahead of time)
this is on a obdI f-body, but I don't imagine you would have lost any sensor inputs; regardless, you could probably find a spare input that you could use? This would help get around the "synch" problem, unless there was a very high latency in the controller itself (which I don't see why their should be).
Chris
Chris
Trending Topics
You can corralate voltage to a particular A/F mixture or temperature reading (for the EGT).
I think I paid $200 for all three pieces. I ended up just giving it all to the guy I sold the TA to. I'm thinking of trying something like that again.
A true wide band O2 sensor is a 5-wire sensor and are usually accurate from 10:1 to 20:1 A/F.
A 4-wire sensor is actually really accurate too, but usually from like 11:1 to 15:1, which should still be ok.
The only other thing I would need to do is connect this data acquisition jobby to the tach so I can record rpm along with O2 and EGT. That means we would have to figure out what voltage corralates to what rpm. For example maybe 1.1V is 2800rpm and 1.2V is 2850rpm and 1.3V is 2900rpm, who knows??
If anyone can answer that and figure out a good place to tab the tach this may be a doable product and a lot cheaper than other options. Plus programming with an EGT is really kick ***!
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
http://www.huntleyracing.com/o2sensordatasheet.htm
Gary
[ February 23, 2002: Message edited by: 99 WS6 ]</p>
Each wideband sensor should be aroud $225 if you get them from Honda instead of NTK. I believe NTK charges a little more for the same sensor.
1) would this mount next to the factory o2 sensor?
2) Would you only use one sensor, and if so, does it matter which side it's on?
3) With the wideband o2, can that be unplugged and then plugged into a dyno that supports wideband o2?
4) Is this mainly for WOT A/F readings, I would think that at cruise/part open throttle that this would read 14.7, that is what the computer is trying to maintain anyway?
Thanks
Pat/
<strong>a couple of questions here????
1) would this mount next to the factory o2 sensor?
2) Would you only use one sensor, and if so, does it matter which side it's on?
3) With the wideband o2, can that be unplugged and then plugged into a dyno that supports wideband o2?
4) Is this mainly for WOT A/F readings, I would think that at cruise/part open throttle that this would read 14.7, that is what the computer is trying to maintain anyway?
Thanks
Pat/</strong><hr></blockquote>
1 and 2) I am not running rear o2 sensors and I will be putting the wideband o2 sensor on the right side (passenger). Due to the dampener in the fuel rail the right side usually gets less fuel than the driver side.
3) If you mean electrically unplugged from the FJO box and electrically plugged into the dyno wideband reader, most likely not. Each sensor type/brand has its own calibration. It may work if they use the same sensor but I would count on it.
4) The wideband should read very close at stoick (14.7) but will show way different below say 13:1. Since the stock cant really read lower than that.
I bought the wideband for several reasons:
1. The nearest dyno is about 3 hours away.
2. Dyno do not fully load the car especially on turbo cars like mine. So you have to guess what your boost and air fuel ratio will be. I dont like guessing.
3. I have a nice straight, but has little rolling hills and has a 6 miles stretch of road that does not get patrolled that I can get the car in the 120-130 mph range without going air born.
So basically a dyno would be waste of time for me.
Gary


