Running a MAF
A MAF sensor is ill-equipped to measure the airflow past it. Most MAF sensors are based on a hotwire system, or a bending reed. Either way, they are designed to measure the speed at which air is passing them, not the density of the air. A MAP sensor is more likely to work correctly because it measures pressure
Last edited by ringram; Feb 23, 2006 at 03:39 AM.
Chris
I am a fan of the maf.
Ryan

Most you'll find still run a MAF, generally you disable the MAF to get your VE inline and then people will calibrate their MAF against hte new VE table.
If you plan on running a 2 bar or 3 bar MAP then you want to go Speed Density. Or if you have a 90mm intake and TB, then the MAF is a restriction so a SD tune is best.
I run an LS6 intake and ported TB, and run SD full time since now that the car's dialed in it runs great, and I see no need toput the MAF back on.
Theoretically, a SD tune will make more power than a MAF tune since you're eliminating a constriction in the system... but theory and reality don't always coincide... a well tuned SD tune vs a well tuned MAF tune are probably going to be pretty close (I've never seen a side by side dyno of the same car, first running SD and then running MAF)
Trending Topics
I prefer no MAF in the system for simplicity & the quickness in working the tune & troubleshooting that accompany the simplicity.
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
IMO in general, MAFs do more for you at low engine speeds than they do at higher speeds, where I think there's pretty much no difference in MAF and SD systems besides the added restriction. That suggests that as you increase the size of the MAF, there really isn't any added benefit in operation besides eliminating the restriction. This only makes sense if you're looking for a way to avoid switching to SD and keep a MAF in the system.
IMO switching to SD is the easier and cheaper way.
A SD or MAP based system could very well outperform an oversized MAF system at every engine speed.
Other than the loss in resolution at low engines speeds, there's no reason the 100mm MAF couldn't be made to work as needed.
I have run a MAF that flowed 25%+ more air than my factory unit. I had to recalibrate the entire MAF table, but it didn't cause any problems or take a long time to adjust for.
But then not all MAFs are the same.
So I proposed to Bob today that I build A few more of these 100mm and find a few of you guys to test these BAd boys and find out if there worth the price of admission...
I dont know Im just throwing a hat in the ring....
It is a working unit...
It is capable of sustaining WOT timing
It is capable of of mantaining 600 RWHP and 700 ftlb trq
It has only been at its development stage for only one full day dyno session...
I have not "pegged it" yet
It is obviously going to be a lot of work and we are getting so swamped I just dont when we can get it all sorted or if we should ????
So there it is in a nutshell
What do you guys think it is worth it???
or should we just go full onslaught SD and leave the MAF in the dust..
any and all help would be apreciated
Brent 260-244-4808
I see the benefits of having a MAF in place to be very few, and feel it's very easy to work around.
The resolution problem will always be a hurtle with current designs.
another possible work around could be using a small MAF for low speed resolution, and a bypass that opens to un-metered air once the MAF has reached a certian flow. I haven't seen anyone go that route, but then again it's so easy just to switch to SD mode.






