O2 sensor slow response fix
I had a good tune, street cam/head setup and long tube headers with high flow cats. I ran with the PO133, PO153 codes for a year and a half. New O2 sensors (Bosch 13111) did not fix it. My O2 heater circuit was working and fuse was never blown. Checked all relative ground connection (they looked great). No exhaust leaks.
I did not want to spend time revising the tune to fix this and I was due for the NJ inspection.
Heres what worked for me.
If you examine the bosch 13111 O2 sensor it has 3 very small slots in the protective cover over the sensor. These slots are how the exhaust reaches the sensor. Someone had reported better results with Denso O2's. I noticed that they had small holes in the cover instead of these small slots.
I drilled 6 small holes about 0.10 dia. in pairs, in the protective cover between the slots. See pics You must not drill to deep and damage the sensor. I used a drill press, set the stop on it and just broke thru the protective cover.
Installed the new modded sensors and
all is good.Cleared the computer, ran thru the GM computer ready requirements and I have not had a code or drivability issue since (approx. 500 miles to date).
I don't know how long the sensors will last. But I am good for two years or until I make a new major mod (or the sensor dies).
Give it a try


It would have been nice to know the before and after.
I did also notice an improvement in cold engine characteristics
ex. below 150 deg coolant temp. I had some hunting for idle as the car came to a stop. When hot this was not there.
ex. below 150 deg coolant temp. I had some hunting for idle as the car came to a stop. When hot this was not there.
Without a drill press what would you suggest?
hacksaw or triangle file by hand. I'd go for the
power tool though, and plenty of shop air to get
rid of metallic residues.
Trending Topics
I had been following a post here on the bosch O2's with no solutions.
I figured all I had to loose was $80 for a sensor and a little time.
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
the heat losses through the body. Could you see any
changes to the switching waveforms after doing this?
However, with non heated sensors, which rely on the exhaust to stay warm, opening the baffles will let more heat into the switching component.
Nevertheless, I will give it it a shot. This problem has been tormenting me ever since the LT's went in.
Thanks for sharing, Mr Jones!
Last edited by ShevrolayZ28; Nov 25, 2006 at 08:46 PM.
can anyone post a scan of before and after sensor switching?
can anyone also verify the acuracy or change in air/fuel ratio with a modded sensor.
Thanks
can anyone post a scan of before and after sensor switching?
can anyone also verify the acuracy or change in air/fuel ratio with a modded sensor.
Thanks
gripe.
With the heated sensor you have the potential for
heat loss to the gas, but I believe more significant
is the conduction loss to the header wall through
the sensor body. The gas heat has to overcome
this, it's evident that the heater power alone can't.
A higher flux of low-grade heat can make up for
the lesser temperature, from cooling, of the gas
if the problem is heat conduction away from the
element.
At least, that's the way I see it and the results
shown so far seem to bear it out.

can anyone post a scan of before and after sensor switching?
can anyone also verify the acuracy or change in air/fuel ratio with a modded sensor.
Thanks


