PCM Diagnostics & Tuning HP Tuners | Holley | Diablo

Best way to tune spark table

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 26, 2007 | 07:34 PM
  #1  
brad8266's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 8,797
Likes: 0
From: Watertown, NY
Default Best way to tune spark table

What is the best way to tune the spark table for all of the cells? I would imagine it being difficult to tune each cell and get it right. How does everyone else do it? I will be tuning my 232/236 112 cam with 57cc heads and any pointers on how to get the spark table real good would be helpful.

I was thinking increase unitl it knocks but there are so many cells that would take forver. Or should i just increase the entire spark table by a lot so I get knock retard in all cells and then just decrese the cells by the amounf of knock retard i got?
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2007 | 08:13 PM
  #2  
nikon1999's Avatar
10 Second Club
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,290
Likes: 14
From: Wellesley, MA
Default

are you using hptuners? if so i would look at someones tune from the repository that has a simliar setup to yous and compare tables.. I'd start with theirs and play with it from that point
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2007 | 08:29 PM
  #3  
ZL1Killa's Avatar
TECH Resident
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 3,747
Likes: 0
From: NC - Charlotte area
Default

don't increase a bunch and then get hell of a lot of KR....

typical 00' models i have seen runn between 24-28 degrees timing WOT in the upper areas. otherwise make sure it has smooth transitions.. you DO NOT want spikes
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2007 | 08:49 PM
  #4  
brad8266's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 8,797
Likes: 0
From: Watertown, NY
Default

Originally Posted by ZL1Killa
don't increase a bunch and then get hell of a lot of KR....

typical 00' models i have seen runn between 24-28 degrees timing WOT in the upper areas. otherwise make sure it has smooth transitions.. you DO NOT want spikes
So with the cam is is just good to advance a few degrees in the entire table? I can easily do my WOT spark areas i am just morte concerned with the rest of the table.
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2007 | 08:53 PM
  #5  
Rhino79's Avatar
9 Second Club
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 3,126
Likes: 0
From: Cabot, AR
Default

I would say you could add around 2-3 degrees on the entire table probably and definetly in the cruise area of the table.
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2007 | 09:00 PM
  #6  
brad8266's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 8,797
Likes: 0
From: Watertown, NY
Default

Originally Posted by Rhino79
I would say you could add around 2-3 degrees on the entire table probably and definetly in the cruise area of the table.
I added like 4-5 degrees already in the 1600 rpm and below cells. Car doesnt surge either really runs good. I guess i will just add 4-5 degrees everywhere and see how it responds. If i see knock retard all over the place i will back it off a degree or 2 through the whole table.
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2007 | 09:03 PM
  #7  
cantdrv65's Avatar
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 3,202
Likes: 0
From: TEXASS
Post

I just smoothed and increased the entire table by like 3 degrees. I have to different dyno tests going from stock and then the three degrees. No difference in power whatsoever.....I've talked to quite a few high volume tuners adding advance to the stock table isn't going to make much difference. In fact add too much and you will lose power. I think mine lost power when I tried 29 degrees. I run 26.0 - 26.5 at WOT now....stock is 24.

Adding in the lower range does help streetablity though.
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2007 | 09:06 PM
  #8  
brad8266's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 8,797
Likes: 0
From: Watertown, NY
Default

Originally Posted by cantdrv65
I just smoothed and increased the entire table by like 3 degrees. I have to different dyno tests going from stock and then the three degrees. No difference in power whatsoever.....I've talked to quite a few high volume tuners adding advance to the stock table isn't going to make much difference. In fact add too much and you will lose power. I think mine lost power when I tried 29 degrees. I run 26.0 - 26.5 at WOT now....stock is 24.

Adding in the lower range does help streetablity though.
I am not looking from real power gains from messing with the timing, i am just looking to make it as nice on the strret as possible. Cams seem to like more spark advance.

Last edited by brad8266; Mar 26, 2007 at 09:15 PM.
Reply
LS1 Tech Stories

The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time

story-0

Amazing '71 Camaro Restomod Is Modern Muscle Car Under the Skin

 Verdad Gallardo
story-1

6 Common C5 Corvette Failures and What's Involved In Repairing Them

 Pouria Savadkouei
story-2

Retro Modern Bandit Pontiac Trans AM Comes With Burt Reynolds' Autograph

 Verdad Gallardo
story-3

Top 10 Greatest Cadillac V Series Performance Models Ever, Ranked

 Pouria Savadkouei
story-4

Top 10 Most Powerful Chevy Trucks Ever Made!

 
story-5

Hennessey's New Supercharged Silverado ZR2 Has 700 HP

 Verdad Gallardo
story-6

Coachbuilt N2A Anteros Is an LS2-Powered C6 Corvette In Italian Clothes

 Verdad Gallardo
story-7

Awesome K5 Blazer Restomod Comes With C7 Corvette Power

 Verdad Gallardo
story-8

10 Camaros You Should Never Buy

 
story-9

10 LS Engine Myths That Refuse to Die

 Verdad Gallardo
Old Mar 26, 2007 | 09:22 PM
  #9  
brad8266's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 8,797
Likes: 0
From: Watertown, NY
Default

My stock spark table looks like ***, all jagged. Should i smooth it all out?
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2007 | 09:25 PM
  #10  
Rhino79's Avatar
9 Second Club
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 3,126
Likes: 0
From: Cabot, AR
Default

2-3 degrees was a conservative figure, I have tuned cars that cruise around 40-42* of timing, and they barely required any throttle effort, definetly helped the MPG too!
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2007 | 05:57 AM
  #11  
ringram's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
20 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,691
Likes: 1
From: Sunny London, UK
Default

You can log KR against the spark table and remove where it occurs. BUT, to do it properly you need to hit the dyno. I spent around 1 year working on spark, but 1hr on the dyno showed me the pointlessness of it all. Timing was up to 10* out from max tq in places.
Save your time and get fueling sorted then head to the dyno.
This is where a realtime solution works well. Get the dyno operator to load up the engine and hold it in a cell, then adjust timing until you get max tq, then move on.
efilive has a good tune tool and when used with roadrunner makes this easy. You can get the tune too to move to the active load cell and blend the area not just the cell. This makes the process easier and faster, as you can imagine. tuning each cell can take like 30sec-1min to zero in on pk tq. Just go in 1* increments, not like 0.1* or anything silly. I spent about 1.5hrs and did most part throttle cells and got loads more power.
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2007 | 06:13 AM
  #12  
brad8266's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 8,797
Likes: 0
From: Watertown, NY
Default

Originally Posted by ringram
You can log KR against the spark table and remove where it occurs. BUT, to do it properly you need to hit the dyno. I spent around 1 year working on spark, but 1hr on the dyno showed me the pointlessness of it all. Timing was up to 10* out from max tq in places.
Save your time and get fueling sorted then head to the dyno.
This is where a realtime solution works well. Get the dyno operator to load up the engine and hold it in a cell, then adjust timing until you get max tq, then move on.
efilive has a good tune tool and when used with roadrunner makes this easy. You can get the tune too to move to the active load cell and blend the area not just the cell. This makes the process easier and faster, as you can imagine. tuning each cell can take like 30sec-1min to zero in on pk tq. Just go in 1* increments, not like 0.1* or anything silly. I spent about 1.5hrs and did most part throttle cells and got loads more power.
My fueling already close, so i can quickly tune that in more.

And there isnt another way to do realtime without a roadrunner is there? realtime would be great but im not about to buy it just to tune spark.

Last edited by brad8266; Mar 27, 2007 at 06:38 AM.
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2007 | 07:29 PM
  #13  
Ragtop 99's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 9,491
Likes: 1
From: Bethesda, MD
Default

HPTuners has the ability to add/subtract in real time too. The downside is you need to remember what you did because the change doesn't get loaded permanently in the pcm until you adjust the table and upload the bin. I'd printout a grid with rpm and flow and then go through a sample of points using the method shown by ringman. Get off the dyno, load the changes and smooth it out.
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2007 | 08:07 PM
  #14  
brad8266's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 8,797
Likes: 0
From: Watertown, NY
Default

Originally Posted by Ragtop 99
HPTuners has the ability to add/subtract in real time too. The downside is you need to remember what you did because the change doesn't get loaded permanently in the pcm until you adjust the table and upload the bin. I'd printout a grid with rpm and flow and then go through a sample of points using the method shown by ringman. Get off the dyno, load the changes and smooth it out.
Please explain the realtime process in HPT a little more if you dont mind, I was planning on getting HPT but I really like the realtime tuning capability of the RR with EFI Live. I am just split on what to get because I really like the very expensive one but I dont want to spend much money on tuning it, i am starting to get really cheap now that i put so much $$ into my car in the last few months with the new engine and all the goodies.

I havent been able to find much info on the realtime process in HPT so if you could just explain it a little more I would appreciate it. if i can make the realtime changes while in the middle of running the dyno and see how it reacts that is all I need, i can make note of what to do and make the permanent changes and reflash afterwards.
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2007 | 08:27 PM
  #15  
brad8266's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 8,797
Likes: 0
From: Watertown, NY
Default

Nevermind i found a how to on the HPT site that shows the RTT process, and autotune will available on the next release too.
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2007 | 08:48 PM
  #16  
Slowhawk's Avatar
LS1Tech Sponsor
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 14,865
Likes: 6
From: Bridgewater,Ma
Default

A safe bet is 2-3 degree's across the table.I've seen people crank timing way up and the headers started to glow at idle You can not tune low rpm/midrange of KR sensor's.Sometimes lugging it in 6th gear can help tune midrange nicely.
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2007 | 01:15 AM
  #17  
jimmyblue's Avatar
Moderator
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 12,604
Likes: 7
From: East Central Florida
Default

Here's how I did mine a couple of years back.

First, you want to set up the knock retard to not
be so jumpy and to dissipate quicker. I think I cut
the attack by half and increased the decay 4X. It
just makes it not suppress so much of what you'll
be trying to find.

Now you do broad-envelope-driving, logging KR and
the CylAir and the usual suspects. Look at the spark
retard histogram max value. Anywhere it's 0 you add
2 degrees and anywhere it's nonzero you subtract one
to the HO timing table (and be sure you keep the LO
table synced up). Maybe you can find a cuter than
manual way to do this from the histograms. But manual
works.

Do it again. And again. Eventually you get to where
you are tickling KR all over the place. When you are
done playing, subtract 3 degrees from the HO and
maybe another 4 from that, to make the new LO.

You want to remember that this will all want another
looking-at, this summer when the pavement gets
toasty warm. But you might want to throw that
onto the temperature adders if you did the main
table tweaking at your "reference temperatures".
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2007 | 07:45 AM
  #18  
ringram's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
20 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,691
Likes: 1
From: Sunny London, UK
Default

Well while that method is better than just making up timing values, its never going to be the "best" method.
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2007 | 12:49 PM
  #19  
jimmyblue's Avatar
Moderator
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 12,604
Likes: 7
From: East Central Florida
Default

Presuming "best" is hours on a load dyno (easy to find and
cheap to rent ).

From your experience of this sort what can you tell us about
the relation of MBT to onset of KR, presuming a normal-type
fueling and compression? All I've found is some rules-of-thumb,
best torque about 2 degrees before ping (hence my -3 final
adjustment from a +1 KR populated timing table). I would like
to know whether a "normal" LS1 follows this and whether the
non-WOT load-points respond the same as WOT, or if there
may be a higher spread at lower cylinder pressures etc.
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2007 | 02:58 PM
  #20  
BOTTLE ROCKET's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 720
Likes: 0
From: GA
Default

Originally Posted by Rhino79
2-3 degrees was a conservative figure, I have tuned cars that cruise around 40-42* of timing, and they barely required any throttle effort, definetly helped the MPG too!
So WOT timing and cruise timing can be set differently? If so, how much timing are you generaly adding to the cruise timing?
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:58 PM.

story-0
Amazing '71 Camaro Restomod Is Modern Muscle Car Under the Skin

Slideshow: This heavily modified 1971 Camaro mixes classic muscle car styling with a fifth-generation Camaro interior and modern LS3 power.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:06:42


VIEW MORE
story-1
6 Common C5 Corvette Failures and What's Involved In Repairing Them

Slideshow: From wobbling harmonic balancers to failed EBCMs, these are the issues that define long-term C5 ownership and what repairs typically involve.

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-05-07 18:44:57


VIEW MORE
story-2
Retro Modern Bandit Pontiac Trans AM Comes With Burt Reynolds' Autograph

Slideshow: A modern Camaro transformed into a retro icon, this limited-run "Bandit" build blends nostalgia with brute force in a way few revivals manage.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-21 13:57:02


VIEW MORE
story-3
Top 10 Greatest Cadillac V Series Performance Models Ever, Ranked

Slideshow: Cadillac didn't just crash the high-performance luxury vehicle party, it showed up loud, supercharged, and occasionally a little unhinged...

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-04-16 10:05:15


VIEW MORE
story-4
Top 10 Most Powerful Chevy Trucks Ever Made!

Slideshow: Top ten most powerful Chevy trucks ever made

By | 2026-03-25 09:22:26


VIEW MORE
story-5
Hennessey's New Supercharged Silverado ZR2 Has 700 HP

Slideshow: Hennessey has turned the Silverado ZR2 into a 700-hp off-road monster with supercharged V8 power and a limited production run.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-03-24 18:57:52


VIEW MORE
story-6
Coachbuilt N2A Anteros Is an LS2-Powered C6 Corvette In Italian Clothes

Slideshow: A one-off sports car that looks like a vintage Italian exotic-but hides a C6 Corvette underneath-just sold for the price of a new mid-engine Corvette.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-03-23 18:53:41


VIEW MORE
story-7
Awesome K5 Blazer Restomod Comes With C7 Corvette Power

Slideshow: A heavily reworked 1972 K5 Blazer swaps its off-road roots for a low-slung street-focused build with modern V8 power.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-03-09 18:08:45


VIEW MORE
story-8
10 Camaros You Should Never Buy

Slideshow: There are thousands of used Camaros on the market but we think you should avoid these 10

By | 2026-02-17 17:09:30


VIEW MORE
story-9
10 LS Engine Myths That Refuse to Die

Slideshows: Which one of these myths do you believe?

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-01-28 18:10:11


VIEW MORE