H/C ls1 Trans Am vs. Supercharged 2v Mustang
01-28-2010, 04:40 AM
#82
TECH Regular
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: MOV
Posts: 426
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
you keep battleing the 14 second ricers.
And there are 2Vs out there that can't break the 400Rwhp mark.
Maybe you should be able to tell when someone is joking?
You can't say a 380Rwhp boosted 2V is faster than that..
)This thread was hilarious.
Last edited by Ke^in; 01-28-2010 at 04:56 AM.
01-28-2010, 02:08 PM
#84
Oh my christ.............
Are there SERIOUSLY 2v swingers boasting the abilities of the biggest performance TURD ever to hit the streets and call its self a muscle car? Ok first off, let me get my "former 04 GT owner" BS out of the way not like it matters........
After forged internals the skys the limit?
Wut?
The heads, cam and cubic inch displacement are the limit. What are you going to do? Throw Trickflows and cams at it for a million bucks and get walked by a bolt-on or mild cam LS car? And dont even try to throw boost at me lol. Bolt on LSx's see 450+WHP with 5-7psi so you can apples to apples yourself right to the back of the line.
Im sorry but 12s doesnt even get you noticed outside of casual car guys and high school cliques. Theres also this "enigma" that Ford HP usually needs almost 100 or so MORE to step to GM HP. No, seriously, go spend some time watching some fast cars on YouTube and Streetfire. Ever notice how 500RWHP GMs seems to be even with, barely lose, or win against 600+RWHP Fords? Same thing for 430-450WHP GMs against 500-550WHP Fords. Look I dont make the rules, I'm just calling it like I see it. Peak numbers schmeak numbers, the modular engines get ASSAULTED across the RPM band by pushrod blocks. Tiny cubes and a bad performance design of OHC is the root problem, not a lack of forged parts. A 400RWHP Ford 2v GT is not as bad *** as some of you make it out to be. Dont get all caught up in its peak numbers on a Dynojet.
Now, I know since the swingers have NE GTs their going to fight this to the grave. So I'll let you have the last word and I'll just spectate from here. Keep in mind though that this is a GM board and we're not going to sit around while you attempt to pump fear about the biggest weaksauce V8 cars made. Your not going to get a Sticky of "2V GTs" describing what has em and who to fear like your "LS1s" thread over at mustangforums.com. Oh and BTW, all of this is coming from the guy who authored the "IAC Mod" sticky How To over there so dont think that I'm some GM nutswinger thats inexperienced with 2Vs.
Are there SERIOUSLY 2v swingers boasting the abilities of the biggest performance TURD ever to hit the streets and call its self a muscle car? Ok first off, let me get my "former 04 GT owner" BS out of the way not like it matters........
After forged internals the skys the limit?
Wut?
The heads, cam and cubic inch displacement are the limit. What are you going to do? Throw Trickflows and cams at it for a million bucks and get walked by a bolt-on or mild cam LS car? And dont even try to throw boost at me lol. Bolt on LSx's see 450+WHP with 5-7psi so you can apples to apples yourself right to the back of the line.
Im sorry but 12s doesnt even get you noticed outside of casual car guys and high school cliques. Theres also this "enigma" that Ford HP usually needs almost 100 or so MORE to step to GM HP. No, seriously, go spend some time watching some fast cars on YouTube and Streetfire. Ever notice how 500RWHP GMs seems to be even with, barely lose, or win against 600+RWHP Fords? Same thing for 430-450WHP GMs against 500-550WHP Fords. Look I dont make the rules, I'm just calling it like I see it. Peak numbers schmeak numbers, the modular engines get ASSAULTED across the RPM band by pushrod blocks. Tiny cubes and a bad performance design of OHC is the root problem, not a lack of forged parts. A 400RWHP Ford 2v GT is not as bad *** as some of you make it out to be. Dont get all caught up in its peak numbers on a Dynojet.
Now, I know since the swingers have NE GTs their going to fight this to the grave. So I'll let you have the last word and I'll just spectate from here. Keep in mind though that this is a GM board and we're not going to sit around while you attempt to pump fear about the biggest weaksauce V8 cars made. Your not going to get a Sticky of "2V GTs" describing what has em and who to fear like your "LS1s" thread over at mustangforums.com. Oh and BTW, all of this is coming from the guy who authored the "IAC Mod" sticky How To over there so dont think that I'm some GM nutswinger thats inexperienced with 2Vs.
01-28-2010, 02:24 PM
#85
Launching!
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Peoria Illinois
Posts: 287
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
^^^^^ X22222222 Now this guy i can agree with
KE^IN The sky's the limit with a 2v 4.6 LMFAO You need to tell us all where you get your crack from, that's a good one. Anyone who would waste their time and alot of money to forge internal a 2v turd needs their head checked. They could have bought a nice 03 04 05 z06 with all the money they spent.
KE^IN The sky's the limit with a 2v 4.6 LMFAO You need to tell us all where you get your crack from, that's a good one. Anyone who would waste their time and alot of money to forge internal a 2v turd needs their head checked. They could have bought a nice 03 04 05 z06 with all the money they spent.
Last edited by RED94Z28; 01-28-2010 at 02:33 PM.
01-28-2010, 02:26 PM
#86
I won't embarrass myself anywhere, not here nor SVTP.com. I can sit over there just like here in a technical discussion, whether you believe it or not.
You are the one making it hilarious.
01-28-2010, 02:29 PM
#87
Theres also this "enigma" that Ford HP usually needs almost 100 or so MORE to step to GM HP. No, seriously, go spend some time watching some fast cars on YouTube and Streetfire. Ever notice how 500RWHP GMs seems to be even with, barely lose, or win against 600+RWHP Fords? Same thing for 430-450WHP GMs against 500-550WHP Fords. Look I dont make the rules, I'm just calling it like I see it. Peak numbers schmeak numbers, the modular engines get ASSAULTED across the RPM band by pushrod blocks. Tiny cubes and a bad performance design of OHC is the root problem, not a lack of forged parts. A 400RWHP Ford 2v GT is not as bad *** as some of you make it out to be. Dont get all caught up in its peak numbers on a Dynojet.
01-28-2010, 08:29 PM
#88
01-28-2010, 10:55 PM
#89
TECH Apprentice
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: CA
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
When you make a statement like this you need to be more clear. FORDs do not need more power to beat a GM with less power. A 03 Cobra is going to need more power to beat a Z06, sure. But a Fox isn't going to need more power to beat a F-body. Be more clear when you say stuff like this...
01-28-2010, 11:18 PM
#91
01-28-2010, 11:22 PM
#92
TECH Apprentice
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: CA
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yep. LOL
Same here man......this week has reminded me of the old days. I'm still awaitin' some Tarded comebacks in the 'another' thread. LOL
I always find it hilarious that most of them don't seem to want to get into it with me. LOL
I always find it hilarious that most of them don't seem to want to get into it with me. LOL
01-28-2010, 11:25 PM
#93
01-28-2010, 11:28 PM
#95
01-28-2010, 11:33 PM
#96
TECH Apprentice
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: CA
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
01-29-2010, 01:04 AM
#97
11 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Kansas
Posts: 910
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
For the gazillionth time....car A has nothing to do with car B just because they both have X. There are WAY TOO many variables. The term 'boosted 2v' is so f'ing vague it's pathetic. Could be anywhere from 340-420RWHP.
Oh and that Notchback guy.....
Holy ****.... that's all.
Oh and that Notchback guy.....
Holy ****.... that's all.Hi. What's your name?
01-29-2010, 07:06 AM
#100