Buick Regal vs Acura NSX
07-26-2010, 12:31 AM
#1
Teching In
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Buick Regal vs Acura NSX Long story short I ran an Acura NSX from 20-110 and pulled it 2 cars. Guy was being a doucher and proceeded to get yanked by a FWD automatic boat in his $80,000 "Supercar".
I lol'd.
I lol'd.
07-26-2010, 03:03 AM
#5
***Repost Police***
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Good kill, but don't put supercar in quotes... it definitely is one. Do you have any idea what year it was? They range from 252hp-290hp depending on year/transmission.
07-26-2010, 06:22 AM
#6
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (20)
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Liberal land
Posts: 390
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I never much cared for NSX's. Good kill in the regal!
Saw you cruising up and down the pike Sat. I was waiting for you to pull into BK but you never did. We're down there every Sat so if you see the shelby, swing by!
Saw you cruising up and down the pike Sat. I was waiting for you to pull into BK but you never did. We're down there every Sat so if you see the shelby, swing by!
07-26-2010, 08:07 AM
#7
Teching In
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Good kill, I don't nkow why anyone ever spent 80k on something with such little engine power.
Trending Topics
07-26-2010, 09:58 AM
#9
Teching In
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The car was at least a 2001+.
I was trying to get him to run me. It was a younger guy maybe 30 years old. I blipped the throttle at him a few times and he was with his girl just laughing hysterically at me and clapping out the window. We finally got a light and I said "You know it's a shame you won't run it, it'd probably be a sick race". He proceeded to burst into laughter and tell me I should do stand up comedy. The light turned green and I again paced him till he punched it at 20. Much to his shigrin the Regal didn't spin and I started to yank the **** out of him.
I guess I was the real loser anyway, since he was in an Acura you know.
I was trying to get him to run me. It was a younger guy maybe 30 years old. I blipped the throttle at him a few times and he was with his girl just laughing hysterically at me and clapping out the window. We finally got a light and I said "You know it's a shame you won't run it, it'd probably be a sick race". He proceeded to burst into laughter and tell me I should do stand up comedy. The light turned green and I again paced him till he punched it at 20. Much to his shigrin the Regal didn't spin and I started to yank the **** out of him.
I guess I was the real loser anyway, since he was in an Acura you know.
07-26-2010, 10:03 AM
#10
TECH Regular
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 476
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
07-26-2010, 10:11 AM
#12
TECH Resident
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Wouldnt believe me if i told you
Posts: 768
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Guy seems like a douchnozzle so great kill.
But lol at the "its not that fast in a straight line so its not a super car" comments.
This is much akin to how C6 ZO6 owners are in awe that on most road courses a bone stock s2000 will stay ahead of them. "but but its slow in a straight line!"
WHile it seems overpriced to me for what it is that doesnt change the fact of how amazing of a car it is, straight line speed was never its priority but yet when it originally came out in the early 90s it was "fast" for the time.
Still way to show him what was up, i only know one acura NSX owner and he is cool as hell most of the time, their are ******* owners no matter the type of vehicle.
But lol at the "its not that fast in a straight line so its not a super car" comments.
This is much akin to how C6 ZO6 owners are in awe that on most road courses a bone stock s2000 will stay ahead of them. "but but its slow in a straight line!"
WHile it seems overpriced to me for what it is that doesnt change the fact of how amazing of a car it is, straight line speed was never its priority but yet when it originally came out in the early 90s it was "fast" for the time.
Still way to show him what was up, i only know one acura NSX owner and he is cool as hell most of the time, their are ******* owners no matter the type of vehicle.
07-26-2010, 10:11 AM
#13
Teching In
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
07-26-2010, 10:43 AM
#15
Teching In
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
07-26-2010, 10:47 AM
#16
Staging Lane
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Malibu, CA
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Mid 13's to low 14's out of a "supercar" wasn't fast even for the early 90's. The Corvette ZR1 and Dodge Viper RT/10 offered much faster acceleration and would run with an NSX in the corners no problem. In some tests the ZR1 outperformed the NSX in slalom and skidpad. And cost about $15,000 less to boot!
07-26-2010, 10:53 AM
#17
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Flint MI
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
hey i paid 9500 for my camaro and i can run 12.70s all day long... as for the nsx... yeah they arent the fastest thing in the world but i think they gorgeous, either way, as for the goats, your wasting money lol shoulda bout a camaro or transam
07-26-2010, 10:56 AM
#18
Staging Lane
07-26-2010, 10:56 AM
#19
Teching In
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
And why was my GTO a waste of money? If I wanted to be slow I woulda got an fbody
