Witnessed: GTO vs 11 5.0
09-17-2010, 03:36 PM
#61
Teching In
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: West Monroe LA
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
All GTOs suck except for ones owned by my friends........ LOL
Seriously though, I remember project "Head Poncho" in GM High Tech. It was an LS2 goat. The full bolt-on setup consisted of stall, drag radials, headers, exhaust, cold air intake, underdrive pulley... It went 12.2 at 110mph. I can't remember if it had a Fast intake at that time or if they waited till the heads and cam.... I think they waited. With the TrickFlow heads, cam, and intake added it went 11.3 at 119 after frying and replacing a low mileage 4l60.
We are planning a Magnacharger install for Lee Zaunbrecher's LS1 GTO very soon at my shop. Hopefully we will beat the heads/cam time that the Head Poncho car put down.
Seriously though, I remember project "Head Poncho" in GM High Tech. It was an LS2 goat. The full bolt-on setup consisted of stall, drag radials, headers, exhaust, cold air intake, underdrive pulley... It went 12.2 at 110mph. I can't remember if it had a Fast intake at that time or if they waited till the heads and cam.... I think they waited. With the TrickFlow heads, cam, and intake added it went 11.3 at 119 after frying and replacing a low mileage 4l60.
We are planning a Magnacharger install for Lee Zaunbrecher's LS1 GTO very soon at my shop. Hopefully we will beat the heads/cam time that the Head Poncho car put down.
yes 
09-17-2010, 03:38 PM
#63
On The Tree
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
All GTOs suck except for ones owned by my friends........ LOL
Seriously though, I remember project "Head Poncho" in GM High Tech. It was an LS2 goat. The full bolt-on setup consisted of stall, drag radials, headers, exhaust, cold air intake, underdrive pulley... It went 12.2 at 110mph. I can't remember if it had a Fast intake at that time or if they waited till the heads and cam.... I think they waited. With the TrickFlow heads, cam, and intake added it went 11.3 at 119 after frying and replacing a low mileage 4l60.
We are planning a Magnacharger install for Lee Zaunbrecher's LS1 GTO very soon at my shop. Hopefully we will beat the heads/cam time that the Head Poncho car put down.
Seriously though, I remember project "Head Poncho" in GM High Tech. It was an LS2 goat. The full bolt-on setup consisted of stall, drag radials, headers, exhaust, cold air intake, underdrive pulley... It went 12.2 at 110mph. I can't remember if it had a Fast intake at that time or if they waited till the heads and cam.... I think they waited. With the TrickFlow heads, cam, and intake added it went 11.3 at 119 after frying and replacing a low mileage 4l60.
We are planning a Magnacharger install for Lee Zaunbrecher's LS1 GTO very soon at my shop. Hopefully we will beat the heads/cam time that the Head Poncho car put down.
09-17-2010, 03:38 PM
#64
TECH Resident
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Wouldnt believe me if i told you
Posts: 768
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I want in on that list lol 13.0 @109 in my stock, stock heavy GTO. 
But hey tough guy bubba over here has seen youtube vids and the best was 13.3 so i know its a little hard to believe 
But hey tough guy bubba over here has seen youtube vids and the best was 13.3 so i know its a little hard to believe 
That isnt true. 
09-17-2010, 03:51 PM
#70
Teching In
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: West Monroe LA
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
project "Head Poncho" in GM High Tech. It was an LS2 goat. The full bolt-on setup consisted of stall, drag radials, headers, exhaust, cold air intake, underdrive pulley... It went 12.2 at 110mph
in all seriousness if you did go 13.0 i would be amazed since the full bold on version was only 8 tenths faster than you but with the same MPH
09-17-2010, 03:54 PM
#71
TECH Resident
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Wouldnt believe me if i told you
Posts: 768
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
WOW you must be the best driver in the world.
project "Head Poncho" in GM High Tech. It was an LS2 goat. The full bolt-on setup consisted of stall, drag radials, headers, exhaust, cold air intake, underdrive pulley... It went 12.2 at 110mph
in all seriousness if you did go 13.0 i would be amazed since the full bold on version was only 8 tenths faster than you but with the same MPH
project "Head Poncho" in GM High Tech. It was an LS2 goat. The full bolt-on setup consisted of stall, drag radials, headers, exhaust, cold air intake, underdrive pulley... It went 12.2 at 110mph
in all seriousness if you did go 13.0 i would be amazed since the full bold on version was only 8 tenths faster than you but with the same MPH
Lots of bone stock GTOs int he 12s. Throw on headers tune and a decent tire and they have been in the 11s, frequently.
09-17-2010, 03:57 PM
#72
Teching In
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: West Monroe LA
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
project "Head Poncho" in GM High Tech. It was an LS2 goat. The full bolt-on setup consisted of stall, drag radials, headers, exhaust, cold air intake, underdrive pulley... It went 12.2 at 110mph
09-17-2010, 04:01 PM
#73
TECH Resident
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Wouldnt believe me if i told you
Posts: 768
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hey i read somewhere that a modded new 5.0 ran high 13s! **** all the magazine times and proven posts on forums that show it to be able to run WAY better times, i will choose to believe that ONE run instead of the proven results posted before me!
But hey im the fanboy here clearly.
09-17-2010, 04:04 PM
#74
Launching!
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Arizona
Posts: 200
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So keep going off your -2000 DA 5.0 times thinking they are the norm because you couldn't be more wrong and it makes me smile.
09-17-2010, 04:04 PM
#75
TECH Resident
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Wouldnt believe me if i told you
Posts: 768
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
here ill do this again.....
Pulled from the list on ls2gto.com. Not one under that but the whole damn list is faster than mid 13s. And whats the fastest time again? What mid 12s. No way a heavy underpowered car ran that.
LS2 Stock Class: Last Updated: 03/17/2009
1) M6, RocketCutlass, 12.655@110.82 2.034 60'
2) M6, AmishAssassin,12.82@110.33 2.060 60'
3) A4, andrewzpsu, 12.877@108.09 1.914 60'
4) A4, NYTIGER 12.920@109.40 2.033 60'
5) M6, Boilermaker GTO 12.929@106.89 1.887 60'
6) M6, Go Bucks!, 12.967@109.16 2.056 60'
7) A4, 05torridred60 12.971@108 MPH 2.01 60' SAP mufflers
8) M6, jumbojet 12.974@108.80 2.027 60'
9) M6, BlackSheep 12.98@108 MPH
10) M6, GTOboss 13.007@108.52mp
11) M6, IBM6GTO 13.025@107.73 2.056 60'
12) M6, 06PhantomGoat 13.028@106.88 1.989 60'
13) M6, KYGTO 13.035@108.96 2.018 60'
14) M6, Judgethis05 13.036@108.72
15) A4, DaveIs, 13.042@105.54 1.845 60'
16) M6, hookmechanic 13.074@106.76 1.931 60
17) M6, SLoW SHO 13.082@108.15
18) M6, SloNlo 13.086@108.75
19) A4, Southjersey, 13.09@106.63 1.984 60'
20) M6, Aerobirdmotorsports 13.098@106.91 1.988 60'
21) A4, Benzo Mike, 13.099@106.83 1.941 60'
22) M6, TheCamel 13.112@108.49 2.257 60'
23) A4, BadGTO 13.14@104.99 2.046 60'
LS2 Stock Class: Last Updated: 03/17/2009
1) M6, RocketCutlass, 12.655@110.82 2.034 60'
2) M6, AmishAssassin,12.82@110.33 2.060 60'
3) A4, andrewzpsu, 12.877@108.09 1.914 60'
4) A4, NYTIGER 12.920@109.40 2.033 60'
5) M6, Boilermaker GTO 12.929@106.89 1.887 60'
6) M6, Go Bucks!, 12.967@109.16 2.056 60'
7) A4, 05torridred60 12.971@108 MPH 2.01 60' SAP mufflers
8) M6, jumbojet 12.974@108.80 2.027 60'
9) M6, BlackSheep 12.98@108 MPH
10) M6, GTOboss 13.007@108.52mp
11) M6, IBM6GTO 13.025@107.73 2.056 60'
12) M6, 06PhantomGoat 13.028@106.88 1.989 60'
13) M6, KYGTO 13.035@108.96 2.018 60'
14) M6, Judgethis05 13.036@108.72
15) A4, DaveIs, 13.042@105.54 1.845 60'
16) M6, hookmechanic 13.074@106.76 1.931 60
17) M6, SLoW SHO 13.082@108.15
18) M6, SloNlo 13.086@108.75
19) A4, Southjersey, 13.09@106.63 1.984 60'
20) M6, Aerobirdmotorsports 13.098@106.91 1.988 60'
21) A4, Benzo Mike, 13.099@106.83 1.941 60'
22) M6, TheCamel 13.112@108.49 2.257 60'
23) A4, BadGTO 13.14@104.99 2.046 60'
09-17-2010, 04:09 PM
#76
Seems like one magazine tested an LS2 goat at 12.9 in the quarter mile stock. A friend of mine with a tune only LS2 A4 Goat ran with us several times last year at Twin City Dragway in Monroe. I saw him run mid 13s on average and dipped down to 13.2 in one race. Yes his car is capable of 12s (and no, it was not faster than my tune/intake SRT8 Charger heh heh). The truth is that temperature, humidity, and elevation play a huge role in ETs.
FYI: I have also heard of SRT8 300s running around a 12.6 - 12.7 stock but that is not the norm at all.
DA can easily rob/add 40 + rear wheel horsepower depending on conditions
FYI: I have also heard of SRT8 300s running around a 12.6 - 12.7 stock but that is not the norm at all.
DA can easily rob/add 40 + rear wheel horsepower depending on conditions
09-17-2010, 04:12 PM
#77
Teching In
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: West Monroe LA
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Dam one example of a terrible run....i like your logic.
Hey i read somewhere that a modded new 5.0 ran high 13s! **** all the magazine times and proven posts on forums that show it to be able to run WAY better times, i will choose to believe that ONE run instead of the proven results posted before me!
But hey im the fanboy here clearly.
Hey i read somewhere that a modded new 5.0 ran high 13s! **** all the magazine times and proven posts on forums that show it to be able to run WAY better times, i will choose to believe that ONE run instead of the proven results posted before me!
But hey im the fanboy here clearly.
http://www.highperformancepontiac.co...est/index.html
here but i guess these guys cant drive since i mean thats what they do for a living. I know how you hate reading so here ill cut the part out for you...
"Evan Smith was the first driver of the GTO and would ultimately run the low e.t. of the day for it. Beginning at 13.8 on a shakedown run to learn the characteristics of the car, the second pass dropped to 13.65 and on the third 13.52. After the 3 back-to-back passes, the Pontiac was parked for a cooldown."
09-17-2010, 04:16 PM
#78
TECH Resident
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Wouldnt believe me if i told you
Posts: 768
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
as i said earlier lots of people buy all the lightweight stuff they can in order to get on these fastest stock board post.
http://www.highperformancepontiac.co...est/index.html
here but i guess these guys cant drive since i mean thats what they do for a living. I know how you hate reading so here ill cut the part out for you...
"Evan Smith was the first driver of the GTO and would ultimately run the low e.t. of the day for it. Beginning at 13.8 on a shakedown run to learn the characteristics of the car, the second pass dropped to 13.65 and on the third 13.52. After the 3 back-to-back passes, the Pontiac was parked for a cooldown."
http://www.highperformancepontiac.co...est/index.html
here but i guess these guys cant drive since i mean thats what they do for a living. I know how you hate reading so here ill cut the part out for you...
"Evan Smith was the first driver of the GTO and would ultimately run the low e.t. of the day for it. Beginning at 13.8 on a shakedown run to learn the characteristics of the car, the second pass dropped to 13.65 and on the third 13.52. After the 3 back-to-back passes, the Pontiac was parked for a cooldown."
09-17-2010, 04:17 PM
#79
Teching In
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: West Monroe LA
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hi! Heard of weather and altitude? Cause they change! No honestly! They do! Guess what?!?! They also both affect how cars run! Significantly! Jesus Tap-Dancing Christ!
So keep going off your -2000 DA 5.0 times thinking they are the norm because you couldn't be more wrong and it makes me smile.
So keep going off your -2000 DA 5.0 times thinking they are the norm because you couldn't be more wrong and it makes me smile.
09-17-2010, 04:19 PM
#80
Teching In
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: West Monroe LA
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts