Street Racing & Kill Stories Basic Technical Questions & Advice

C6Z vs. 500hp Turbo S2k (vid)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-21-2010 | 07:47 PM
  #61  
Killemall's Avatar
Launching!

 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 278
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Sticks n Stones
Alright fellas, looks like it's time for a put up or shut up match! And it's about time for Killemall to mod his damned Viper- and I'm betting a S2K walking him will be the perfect catalyst to get him down that mod road! "Video or it didnt happen"
Sure it's just an extra 40 rwhp putting me in the high 400's rwhp and low 500's tourque at the wheels but it's somthing..Feel confidant I would rape a stock srt10
Old 11-21-2010 | 07:55 PM
  #62  
Irunelevens's Avatar
***Repost Police***

 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
From: DFW, TX
Default

Damn man, put all your **** in one post
Old 11-21-2010 | 08:45 PM
  #63  
the-s2k's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Default

so, the ulitmate question is when are we doing this?
Old 11-21-2010 | 09:42 PM
  #64  
joeyballs's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Killemall
Ive said it before and Illsay it again..You cannot compare TT small displacement Jap cars to big displacement american NA cars..

Sure it was a 520 rwhp 3100 pound vette verses a 510 rwhp 2400 pound s2000 and by all intents and purposes on paper the s2000 has a HUGE power to weight advantage..But what paper dosent show is that in the real world the instantaneous power/torque of the american NA monster will often times beat the more powerful power to weight smaller displacement TT Jap car...

You can call it boost lag or no power under the curve or a 100 different excuse....I call it No *****...As the Z06 climbs out a car to car and a half with it's bowling ***** dragging behind...

God bless american muscle!
I gotta step in here, First of all, Is this S2000 stripped? If not its 2,900lbs at the lightest ........I have a 580HP Turbo S200O with 420 ft/lbs of torque, I step on it, and the car moves, and it moves rather quickly. I have yet to find a Z06 to have big enough ***** to pull away from me. Instantaneous torque or not, once my turbo fully spools, which takes all of 1-2 seconds, my car usually pulls away quite easily from "American N/A muscle".


I would say Gearing and Aerodynamics have more to do with a slightly less powerful Z06 walking a slightly higher horsepower S2000

That being said, there is something to be said for huge displacement motors, the amount of Torque a Viper makes is just F---- awesome, and is the reason why the ACR is the first car I would buy if I won the Lottery (or made enough money to buy any car I wanted, lol)


Here is my car in case ya live in the Northeast and ever see me on the highway


Last edited by joeyballs; 11-21-2010 at 10:20 PM.
Old 11-21-2010 | 10:13 PM
  #65  
LightningTeg's Avatar
Teching In

 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
From: Indianapolis Area
Default

Pics of NSX please
Old 11-21-2010 | 11:36 PM
  #66  
RSKY's Avatar
Thread Starter
Teching In
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
From: hawaii
Default

Just came back from a ******* awesome race. I will post up as soon as vid is done being edited and posted to youtube.

SPE 1000rwhp Supra vs SPE900 GTR both on C16. I haven't raced my supra in a long time but needless to say.. in order to beat him I had to brake boost. I'm very sure that if S2K brake boosted me while I was driving the Z06.. He would have walked me. A slow walk but definitely a walk. He probably would have ended a car or two ahead.

I'll make a new thread when the vid comes.
Old 11-22-2010 | 02:40 AM
  #67  
the-s2k's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Default

ummm and where was my invite to watch RSKY!

DAMNIT
Old 11-22-2010 | 02:43 AM
  #68  
the-s2k's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by joeyballs
I gotta step in here, First of all, Is this S2000 stripped? If not its 2,900lbs at the lightest ........I have a 580HP Turbo S200O with 420 ft/lbs of torque, I step on it, and the car moves, and it moves rather quickly. I have yet to find a Z06 to have big enough ***** to pull away from me. Instantaneous torque or not, once my turbo fully spools, which takes all of 1-2 seconds, my car usually pulls away quite easily from "American N/A muscle".

the only thing that is stripped in my car is the trunk. but thank you joey for your step in. clean s2k very clean. my a hella nice sleeper

but saturday kill stories. brake boosted against a 630 hp cobra at 55, raped him 4 cars. braked boost ftw?
Old 11-22-2010 | 07:54 AM
  #69  
joeyballs's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Default

^ nice kill , yea I don't know where the Viper guy got the idea your car weighed 2400lbs, lol.

what kind of Dyno did you put those numbers down on?
Old 11-22-2010 | 10:06 PM
  #70  
the-s2k's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Default

i put them those numbers on a dynojet. but same time next year i hope to have my motor sleeved and built for a raw number of 800 hp def me n you should go to houston and race them
Old 11-23-2010 | 07:58 AM
  #71  
sujomatt's Avatar
TECH Resident
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 796
Likes: 0
From: CT
Default

Can i haz?!
Old 11-23-2010 | 09:41 AM
  #72  
Zac_Speed's Avatar
Launching!
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 272
Likes: 1
From: Liberty, Mo.
Default

Killemall, the thing you're missing with the ACR Viper that has the record is it's on RACING TIRES... All of the GM vehicles are on street tires.. WOW

Good races, love the C6Z platform. Can't wait to have one!
Old 12-03-2010 | 10:43 PM
  #73  
Wesmanw02's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,369
Likes: 3
Default

Originally Posted by TheHitman
Bench racing at its finest.....

The s2k ran the vette without brake boosting. I guarantee with brake boosting it would be a much different race. I call for a driver mod in the s2k.
Pot calling kettle black.

"With brake boosting blah blah blah...."

NOBODY CARES.

How ironic that you call out people for bench racing and then make claims about how much faster the S2K would have been if he "brake boosted".

You shouldn't have to ride the brakes in your car in order to spool the turbo for a race. That means your turbo is way the hell too big for your motor.

LS7 > 4 cylinder. End of story.

And for the record I own a turbo 4 cylinder as well as a V8 car.
Old 12-03-2010 | 10:48 PM
  #74  
Wesmanw02's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,369
Likes: 3
Default

Originally Posted by joeyballs
I gotta step in here, First of all, Is this S2000 stripped? If not its 2,900lbs at the lightest ........I have a 580HP Turbo S200O with 420 ft/lbs of torque, I step on it, and the car moves, and it moves rather quickly. I have yet to find a Z06 to have big enough ***** to pull away from me. Instantaneous torque or not, once my turbo fully spools, which takes all of 1-2 seconds, my car usually pulls away quite easily from "American N/A muscle".
Sounds like you need to go and find some Z06's that aren't bone stock and being driven by 70 year old people.

You would get raped by a bolt on Z06 in the triple digit speeds. End of story.
Old 12-04-2010 | 12:52 AM
  #75  
TheHitman's Avatar
On The Tree
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
From: Waffle Land
Default

Originally Posted by Wesmanw02
Pot calling kettle black.

"With brake boosting blah blah blah...."

NOBODY CARES.

How ironic that you call out people for bench racing and then make claims about how much faster the S2K would have been if he "brake boosted".
Apparently people care because a few people responded and agreed with what I stated.

You shouldn't have to ride the brakes in your car in order to spool the turbo for a race. That means your turbo is way the hell too big for your motor.
People brake boost all the time. Use every play in the book to win. If someone brake boosts to spool their turbo who cares. I'm just stating a fact and discussing a race here.

LS7 > 4 cylinder. End of story.
In this race yes.

In this race no:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6FtMJ8jf2z0

And for the record I own a turbo 4 cylinder as well as a V8 car.
Yeah yeah, whatever.



BTW doesn't this forum have a bench racing section?

Just sayin'

Last edited by TheHitman; 12-04-2010 at 12:58 AM.
Old 12-04-2010 | 12:55 AM
  #76  
Irunelevens's Avatar
***Repost Police***

 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
From: DFW, TX
Default

Wesman hates everything import. And he doesn't deny it, so don't even bother.
Old 12-04-2010 | 01:02 PM
  #77  
LightningTeg's Avatar
Teching In

 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
From: Indianapolis Area
Default

Originally Posted by Wesmanw02
Pot calling kettle black.

"With brake boosting blah blah blah...."

NOBODY CARES.

How ironic that you call out people for bench racing and then make claims about how much faster the S2K would have been if he "brake boosted".

You shouldn't have to ride the brakes in your car in order to spool the turbo for a race. That means your turbo is way the hell too big for your motor.
You're an idiot. I guess the twin turbo drag V8's breaking records on drag radials shouldn't use 2 step to spool there oversized turbos either.
Old 12-04-2010 | 04:47 PM
  #78  
Wesmanw02's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,369
Likes: 3
Default

Originally Posted by LightningTeg
You're an idiot. I guess the twin turbo drag V8's breaking records on drag radials shouldn't use 2 step to spool there oversized turbos either.
You can't call anyone an idiot when you have a piece of **** integra and civic in your sig. That just screams "ricer moron".

A 2 step isn't brake boosting. Its a 2 stage rev limiter, since you obviously don't understand that there is a difference. Using a 2 step to launch is one thing, riding the brakes on the highway to spool your oversized turbo is another.

Go away zero post troll.
Old 12-04-2010 | 04:49 PM
  #79  
Irunelevens's Avatar
***Repost Police***

 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
From: DFW, TX
Default

Both of which probably cost less than your car and run WAY faster. Which is all that he wanted. So... you go away.
Old 12-04-2010 | 04:51 PM
  #80  
Wesmanw02's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,369
Likes: 3
Default

Originally Posted by Irunelevens
Both of which probably cost less than your car and run WAY faster. Which is all that he wanted. So... you go away.
Of course they cost less, they are piece of **** foreign economy cars. Never designed to look nice or go fast. They are designed to save fuel, thats it.

I'm really scared of his 13.55 time too, thats just too damn fast


Quick Reply: C6Z vs. 500hp Turbo S2k (vid)



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:20 PM.