Intake-Pulley-Tune ZR1 vs S/C Challenger SRT8
#1
Teching In
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Socal
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Intake-Pulley-Tune ZR1 vs S/C Challenger SRT8
ZR1: Intake, Pulley, Tune
SRT8: Built Motor, S/C
nice to see an SRT8 finally show its potential lol
http://youtu.be/Op8FRvyxIOc
SRT8: Built Motor, S/C
nice to see an SRT8 finally show its potential lol
http://youtu.be/Op8FRvyxIOc
Trending Topics
#10
I agree with Nite, its about time.
Edit: Seen in the title 750whp. Ehh guess your right. I would have expected it to pull slightly harder. Thats if both cars used the same dyno.
Edit2: Just read the description. ZR1 should be making around 650 on a dynojet which is what the challenger made 750 on. Hmmm now the challenger seems a little more impressive. LOL
#12
#14
6.2L with forged internals vs 6.1,6.4,7.0L?? with forged interals.
2.3L supercharger vs ??? supercharger
15lbs? of boost vs ??lbs of boost (i do know its likely in the teens also)
M6 (very well drivin) vs A5
650rwhp (dynojet) vs 750rwhp (dynojet)
good aero vs horrible aero (it does play a part in a high speed roll race)
3300lbs vs 4200lbs
So its really closer to 100rwhp more. On a car that weighs almost 1000lbs more and cuts through the air like a brick.
#16
Both badass cars and I wouldn't take anything away from this particular Challenger. It's just funny that it runs exactly how it should have and people seem thrilled with that. How bad must they run for the mods, most of the time, for that to be the case.
#17
Teching In
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Socal
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Im looking at it like this.
6.2L with forged internals vs 6.1,6.4,7.0L?? with forged interals.
2.3L supercharger vs ??? supercharger
15lbs? of boost vs ??lbs of boost (i do know its likely in the teens also)
M6 (very well drivin) vs A5
650rwhp (dynojet) vs 750rwhp (dynojet)
good aero vs horrible aero (it does play a part in a high speed roll race)
3300lbs vs 4200lbs
So its really closer to 100rwhp more. On a car that weighs almost 1000lbs more and cuts through the air like a brick.
6.2L with forged internals vs 6.1,6.4,7.0L?? with forged interals.
2.3L supercharger vs ??? supercharger
15lbs? of boost vs ??lbs of boost (i do know its likely in the teens also)
M6 (very well drivin) vs A5
650rwhp (dynojet) vs 750rwhp (dynojet)
good aero vs horrible aero (it does play a part in a high speed roll race)
3300lbs vs 4200lbs
So its really closer to 100rwhp more. On a car that weighs almost 1000lbs more and cuts through the air like a brick.
"Challenger is running a 3.6KB on e-85 at only 12# boost last time I spoke with him.
Car has so much more potential but he doesnt want to turn up the boost."
#18
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: West Pembroke Pines,Fl
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
nice run... i also happen to know the owner as well..here is a vid of that same Challenger with aftermarket wheels 2 years ago ..definitely not an ordinary Challenger, and fast for what it is
#19
Thing is from the (modded) modern mopar world this is a VERY ordinary challenger. Albeit a nice set up but nothing extraordinary.
Now whats extraordinary is a 44x ci NA aluminum block Charger that would rape this Challenger...
Now whats extraordinary is a 44x ci NA aluminum block Charger that would rape this Challenger...