Mach at the track
05-08-2013, 02:25 PM
#2041
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
Yeah, I rememeber reading about his conversions & laughing earlier, but has he ever actually posted a legit 1/4 mile slip?
I am thinking about slapping in the 3800 stall thats been sitting in my garage and running it still on the stock tune to see if I can knock off an 11 second pass. I'd be the only 11 second f-body I know of still on the stock tune. Granted my trans would hate me and it would bounce off the rev limiter before shifting
I am thinking about slapping in the 3800 stall thats been sitting in my garage and running it still on the stock tune to see if I can knock off an 11 second pass. I'd be the only 11 second f-body I know of still on the stock tune. Granted my trans would hate me and it would bounce off the rev limiter before shifting
Not really. That's why I posted notch's slip. Not to argue with you but to show how you would have to back half to get to a 11 sec pass. Your first half not as fast as his in et or mph. So unless you hit that bitch with some nawz your not gonna back half with that car.
******* tards 
05-08-2013, 03:21 PM
#2044
I never once claimed my car would run 11's. I stated that the corrected numbers done on the online correcting calculator was 11.whatever it was. Stupid 1 and stupid 2 are the ones that twisted that into me saying my car would have run that. 
My car ran 7.7@87mph, nothing else.
And Hiho you don't know **** of what you are talking about. (surprise surprise) Keep basing your opinion on what I ran 2 years ago. Car hasn't changed a bit!
My car ran 7.7@87mph, nothing else.
And Hiho you don't know **** of what you are talking about. (surprise surprise) Keep basing your opinion on what I ran 2 years ago. Car hasn't changed a bit!
05-08-2013, 03:48 PM
#2046
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: South Chicago
Posts: 658
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I never once claimed my car would run 11's. I stated that the corrected numbers done on the online correcting calculator was 11.whatever it was. Stupid 1 and stupid 2 are the ones that twisted that into me saying my car would have run that.
My car ran 7.7@87mph, nothing else.
And Hiho you don't know **** of what you are talking about. (surprise surprise) Keep basing your opinion on what I ran 2 years ago. Car hasn't changed a bit!
My car ran 7.7@87mph, nothing else.
And Hiho you don't know **** of what you are talking about. (surprise surprise) Keep basing your opinion on what I ran 2 years ago. Car hasn't changed a bit!
So your 4.56 geared/suspension Mach one on slicks ran a good 1/8 mile time, Big ******* deal man.
Besides, 1/8 mile tracks are gay 
I swear dude you are the biggest troll on this site.
05-08-2013, 04:37 PM
#2050
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
I never once claimed my car would run 11's. I stated that the corrected numbers done on the online correcting calculator was 11.whatever it was. Stupid 1 and stupid 2 are the ones that twisted that into me saying my car would have run that.
My car ran 7.7@87mph, nothing else.
And Hiho you don't know **** of what you are talking about. (surprise surprise) Keep basing your opinion on what I ran 2 years ago. Car hasn't changed a bit!
My car ran 7.7@87mph, nothing else.
And Hiho you don't know **** of what you are talking about. (surprise surprise) Keep basing your opinion on what I ran 2 years ago. Car hasn't changed a bit!
From the the looks of it from 2yrs ago your 1/8 is a little better. But the magical brake drag that seem to keep you from goin faster than 108 in the 1/4 looks like it hurt your 1/8 mph after you fixed it. Jus sayin
05-08-2013, 05:19 PM
#2053
On The Tree
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Wilmywood NC
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
